arXiv subjects

Barbara Schütt

Publications and source records attributed to Barbara Schütt.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

Scene-Extrapolation: Generating Interactive Traffic Scenarios

Verifying highly automated driving functions can be challenging, requiring identifying relevant test scenarios. Scenario-based testing will likely play a significant role in verifying these systems, predominantly occurring within simulation. In our approach, we use traffic scenes as a starting point (seed-scene) to address the individuality of various highly automated driving functions and to avoid the problems associated with a predefined test traffic scenario. Different highly autonomous driving functions, or their distinct iterations, may display different behaviors under the same operating conditions. To make a generalizable statement about a seed-scene, we simulate possible outcomes based on various behavior profiles. We utilize our lightweight simulation environment and populate it with rule-based and machine learning behavior models for individual actors in the scenario. We analyze resulting scenarios using a variety of criticality metrics. The density distributions of the resulting criticality values enable us to make a profound statement about the significance of a particular scene, considering various eventualities.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2023

Clustering-based Criticality Analysis for Testing of Automated Driving Systems

With the implementation of the new EU regulation 2022/1426 regarding the type-approval of the automated driving system (ADS) of fully automated vehicles, scenario-based testing has gained significant importance in evaluating the performance and safety of advanced driver assistance systems and automated driving systems. However, the exploration and generation of concrete scenarios from a single logical scenario can often lead to a number of similar or redundant scenarios, which may not contribute to the testing goals. This paper focuses on the the goal to reduce the scenario set by clustering concrete scenarios from a single logical scenario. By employing clustering techniques, redundant and uninteresting scenarios can be identified and eliminated, resulting in a representative scenario set. This reduction allows for a more focused and efficient testing process, enabling the allocation of resources to the most relevant and critical scenarios. Furthermore, the identified clusters can provide valuable insights into the scenario space, revealing patterns and potential problems with the system's behavior.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2023

Inverse Universal Traffic Quality -- a Criticality Metric for Crowded Urban Traffic Scenes

An essential requirement for scenario-based testing the identification of critical scenes and their associated scenarios. However, critical scenes, such as collisions, occur comparatively rarely. Accordingly, large amounts of data must be examined. A further issue is that recorded real-world traffic often consists of scenes with a high number of vehicles, and it can be challenging to determine which are the most critical vehicles regarding the safety of an ego vehicle. Therefore, we present the inverse universal traffic quality, a criticality metric for urban traffic independent of predefined adversary vehicles and vehicle constellations such as intersection trajectories or car-following scenarios. Our metric is universally applicable for different urban traffic situations, e.g., intersections or roundabouts, and can be adjusted to certain situations if needed. Additionally, in this paper, we evaluate the proposed metric and compares its result to other well-known criticality metrics of this field, such as time-to-collision or post-encroachment time.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2023

1001 Ways of Scenario Generation for Testing of Self-driving Cars: A Survey

Scenario generation is one of the essential steps in scenario-based testing and, therefore, a significant part of the verification and validation of driver assistance functions and autonomous driving systems. However, the term scenario generation is used for many different methods, e.g., extraction of scenarios from naturalistic driving data or variation of scenario parameters. This survey aims to give a systematic overview of different approaches, establish different categories of scenario acquisition and generation, and show that each group of methods has typical input and output types. It shows that although the term is often used throughout literature, the evaluated methods use different inputs and the resulting scenarios differ in abstraction level and from a systematical point of view. Additionally, recent research and literature examples are given to underline this categorization.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2022

Fingerprint of a Traffic Scene: an Approach for a Generic and Independent Scene Assessment

A major challenge in the safety assessment of automated vehicles is to ensure that risk for all traffic participants is as low as possible. A concept that is becoming increasingly popular for testing in automated driving is scenario-based testing. It is founded on the assumption that most time on the road can be seen as uncritical and in mainly critical situations contribute to the safety case. Metrics describing the criticality are necessary to automatically identify the critical situations and scenarios from measurement data. However, established metrics lack universality or a concept for metric combination. In this work, we present a multidimensional evaluation model that, based on conventional metrics, can evaluate scenes independently of the scene type. Furthermore, we present two new, further enhanced evaluation approaches, which can additionally serve as universal metrics. The metrics we introduce are then evaluated and discussed using real data from a motion dataset.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2022

Criticality Metrics for Automated Driving: A Review and Suitability Analysis of the State of the Art

The large-scale deployment of automated vehicles on public roads has the potential to vastly change the transportation modalities of today's society. Although this pursuit has been initiated decades ago, there still exist open challenges in reliably ensuring that such vehicles operate safely in open contexts. While functional safety is a well-established concept, the question of measuring the behavioral safety of a vehicle remains subject to research. One way to both objectively and computationally analyze traffic conflicts is the development and utilization of so-called criticality metrics. Contemporary approaches have leveraged the potential of criticality metrics in various applications related to automated driving, e.g. for computationally assessing the dynamic risk or filtering large data sets to build scenario catalogs. As a prerequisite to systematically choose adequate criticality metrics for such applications, we extensively review the state of the art of criticality metrics, their properties, and their applications in the context of automated driving. Based on this review, we propose a suitability analysis as a methodical tool to be used by practitioners. Both the proposed method and the state of the art review can then be harnessed to select well-suited measurement tools that cover an application's requirements, as demonstrated by an exemplary execution of the analysis. Ultimately, efficient, valid, and reliable measurements of an automated vehicle's safety performance are a key requirement for demonstrating its trustworthiness.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2022

An Application of Scenario Exploration to Find New Scenarios for the Development and Testing of Automated Driving Systems in Urban Scenarios

Verification and validation are major challenges for developing automated driving systems. A concept that gets more and more recognized for testing in automated driving is scenario-based testing. However, it introduces the problem of what scenarios are relevant for testing and which are not. This work aims to find relevant, interesting, or critical parameter sets within logical scenarios by utilizing Bayes optimization and Gaussian processes. The parameter optimization is done by comparing and evaluating six different metrics in two urban intersection scenarios. Finally, a list of ideas this work leads to and should be investigated further is presented.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2021

A taxonomy for quality in simulation-based development and testing of automated driving systems

Ensuring the quality of automated driving systems is a major challenge the automotive industry is facing. In this context, quality defines the degree to which an object meets expectations and requirements. Especially, automated vehicles at SAE level 4 and 5 will be expected to operate safely in various contexts and complex situations without misconduct. Thus, a systematic approach is needed to show their safe operation. A way to address this challenge is simulation-based testing as pure physical testing is not feasible. During simulation-based testing, the data used to evaluate the actual quality of an automated driving system are generated using a simulation. However, to rely on these simulation data, the overall simulation, which also includes its simulation models, must provide a certain quality level. This quality level depends on the intended purpose for which the generated simulation data should be used. Therefore, three categories of quality can be considered: quality of the automated driving system and simulation quality, consisting of simulation model quality and scenario quality. Hence, quality must be determined and evaluated in various process steps in developing and testing automated driving systems, the overall simulation, and the simulation models used for the simulation. In this paper, we propose a taxonomy to serve a better understanding of the concept of quality in the development and testing process to have a clear separation and insight where further testing is needed -- both in terms of automated driving systems and simulation, including their simulation models and scenarios used for testing.

cs.SE↗