Engaging Students Through Math Competitions
This article contains a selection of problems from the American Mathematics Competitions.
arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Bela Bajnok.
This article contains a selection of problems from the American Mathematics Competitions.
Let $A=\{a_1,a_2,\dots, a_m\}$ be a subset of a finite abelian group $G$. We call $A$ {\it $t$-independent} in $G$, if whenever $$λ_1a_1+λ_2a_2+\cdots +λ_m a_m=0$$ for some integers $λ_1, λ_2, \dots , λ_m$ with $$|λ_1|+|λ_2|+\cdots +|λ_m| \leq t,$$ we have $λ_1=λ_2= \cdots = λ_m=0$, and we say that $A$ is {\it $s$-spanning} in $G$, if every element $g$ of $G$ can be written as $$g=λ_1a_1+λ_2a_2+\cdots +λ_m a_m$$ for some integers $λ_1, λ_2, \dots , λ_m$ with $$|λ_1|+|λ_2|+\cdots +|λ_m| \leq s.$$ In this paper we give an upper bound for the size of a $t$-independent set and a lower bound for the size of an $s$-spanning set in $G$, and determine some cases when this extremal size occurs. We also discuss an interesting connection to spherical combinatorics.
The hyperoctahedral group $H$ in $n$ dimensions (the Weyl group of Lie type $B_n$) is the subgroup of the orthogonal group generated by all transpositions of coordinates and reflections with respect to coordinate hyperplanes. A finite set ${\cal X} \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ with a weight function $w: {\cal X} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$ is called a Euclidean $t$-design, if $$\sum_{r \in R} W_r \overline{f}_{S_{r}} = \sum_{{\bf x} \in {\cal X}} w({\bf x}) f({\bf x})$$ holds for every polynomial $f$ of total degree at most $t$; here $R$ is the set of norms of the points in ${\cal X}$, $W_r$ is the total weight of all elements of ${\cal X}$ with norm $r$, $S_r$ is the $n$-dimensional sphere of radius $r$ centered at the origin, and $\overline{f}_{S_{r}}$ is the average of $f$ over $S_{r}$. Here we consider Euclidean designs which are supported by orbits of the hyperoctahedral group. Namely, we prove that any Euclidean design on a union of generalized hyperoctahedra has strength (maximum $t$ for which it is a Euclidean design) equal to 3, 5, or 7. We find explicit necessary and sufficient conditions for when this strength is 5 and for when it is 7. In order to establish our classification, we translate the above definition of Euclidean designs to a single equation for $t=5$, a set of three equations for $t=7$, and a set of seven equations for $t=9$. Neumaier and Seidel (1988), as well as Delsarte and Seidel (1989), proved a Fisher-type inequality $|{\cal X}| \geq N(n,p,t)$ for the minimum size of a Euclidean $t$-design in $\mathbb{R}^n$ on $p=|R|$ concentric spheres (assuming that the design is antipodal if $t$ is odd). A Euclidean design with exactly $N(n,p,t)$ points is called tight. We exhibit new examples of antipodal tight Euclidean designs, supported by orbits of the hyperoctahedral group, for $N(n,p,t)=$(3,2,5), (3,3,7), and (4,2,7).
Let $s$ be a positive integer. Our goal is to find all finite abelian groups $G$ that contain a $2$-subset $A$ for which the undirected Cayley graph $Γ(G,A)$ has diameter at most $s$. We provide a complete answer when $G$ is cyclic, and a conjecture and some partial answers when $G$ is noncyclic.
We present the problems and solutions to the 61st Annual International Mathematical Olympiad
We present the problems and solutions to the 50th Annual USA Mathematical Olympiad.
We present the problems and solutions to the 12th Annual USA Junior Mathematical Olympiad.
A brief overview and history of the American Mathematics Competitions.
Spherical t-designs are Chebyshev-type averaging sets on the d-sphere S^d which are exact for polynomials of degree at most t. This concept was introduced in 1977 by Delsarte, Goethals, and Seidel, who also found the minimum possible size of such designs, in particular, that the number of points in a 3-design on S^d must be at least n>=2d+2. In this paper we give explicit constructions for spherical 3-designs on S^d consisting of n points for d=1 and n>=4; d=2 and n=6; 8; >= 10; d=3 and n=8; >=10; d = 4 and n = 10; 12; >= 14; d>=5 and n>=5(d+1)/2 odd or n>=2d+2 even. We also provide some evidence that 3-designs of other sizes do not exist.
We provide the problems and their solutions to the 2020 USA Mathematical Olympiad.
We provide an historical overview of how advances in technology influenced high school and university mathematical competitions in the United States and at the International Mathematical Olympiad. While students are not allowed the usage of technological aids during mathematical competitions, the developments in technology (especially graphing technology) throughout the past century and the increasing employment of such aids in the classroom have affected both the nature of the proposed problems and their expected solutions. We examine several interesting examples from competitions going back several decades.
Let $G$ be a finite abelian group and $s$ be a positive integer. A subset $A$ of $G$ is called a {\em perfect $s$-basis of $G$} if each element of $G$ can be written uniquely as the sum of at most $s$ (not-necessarily-distinct) elements of $A$; similarly, we say that $A$ is a {\em perfect restricted $s$-basis of $G$} if each element of $G$ can be written uniquely as the sum of at most $s$ distinct elements of $A$. We prove that perfect $s$-bases exist only in the trivial cases of $s=1$ or $|A|=1$. The situation is different with restricted addition where perfection is more frequent; here we treat the case of $s=2$ and prove that $G$ has a perfect restricted $2$-basis if, and only if, it is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_2$, $\mathbb{Z}_4$, $\mathbb{Z}_7$, $\mathbb{Z}_2^2$, $\mathbb{Z}_2^4$, or $\mathbb{Z}_2^2 \times \mathbb{Z}_4$.
Let $G$ be a finite abelian group. A nonempty subset $A$ in $G$ is called a basis of order $h$ if $hA=G$; when $hA \neq G$, it is called a nonbasis of order $h$. Our interest is in all possible sizes of $hA$ when $A$ is a nonbasis of order $h$ in $G$ of maximum size; we provide the complete answer when $h=2$ or $h=3$.
We embark on a tour that takes us through four closely related topics: the dual concepts of independence and spanning in finite abelian groups and the analogous dual concepts of designs and distance sets on spheres. We review some of the main known results in each area, mention several open questions, and discuss some connections among these four interesting topics.
In this survey paper we discuss some recent results and related open questions in additive combinatorics, in particular, questions about sumsets in finite abelian groups.
This text contains over three hundred specific open questions on various topics in additive combinatorics, each placed in context by reviewing all relevant results. While the primary purpose is to provide an ample supply of problems for student research, it is hopefully also useful for a wider audience. It is the author's intention to keep the material current, thus all feedback and updates are greatly appreciated.
For a finite abelian group $G$, a nonempty subset $A$ of $G$, and a positive integer $h$, we let $hA$ denote the $h$-fold sumset of $A$; that is, $hA$ is the collection of sums of $h$ not-necessarily-distinct elements of $A$. Furthermore, for a positive integer $s$, we set $[0,s] A=\cup_{h=0}^s h A$. We say that $A$ is a generating set of $G$ if there is a positive integer $s$ for which $[0,s] A=G$. The $h$-critical number $χ(G,h)$ of $G$ is defined as the smallest positive integer $m$ for which $hA=G$ holds for every $m$-subset $A$ of $G$; similarly, $χ(G,[0,s])$ is the smallest positive integer $m$ for which $[0,s]A=G$ holds for every $m$-subset $A$ of $G$. We define $\widehatχ (G, h)$ as the smallest positive integer $m$ for which $hA=G$ holds for every generating $m$-subset $A$ of $G$; $\widehatχ (G, [0,s])$ is defined similarly. The value of $χ(G,h)$ has been determined by this author for all $G$ and $h$, and $\widehatχ (G, [0,s])$ was introduced and resolved for some special cases by Klopsch and Lev. Here we determine the remaining two quantities in all cases.