arXiv subjects

Ben Kabongo

Publications and source records attributed to Ben Kabongo.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Learning to Rank Explanations for Recommendation with Language Models

Recommender systems are ubiquitous on the Web, making understandable explanations essential for users. Although large language models (LLMs) increasingly generate natural-language justifications, evaluating their factual grounding and personalized relevance remains challenging. Statement-level ranking offers an alternative by selecting concise, review-derived explanations, enabling fine-grained and reproducible evaluation using established ranking metrics. However, existing statement ranking methods largely rely on collaborative representations, while semantic enhancements often fail to outperform simple user-history popularity baselines. Moreover, directly adapting language models for personalized statement ranking remains largely unexplored. In this work, we introduce LMStaR (Language Models for Statement Ranking), a fully text-based framework that formulates personalized explanation ranking as dense retrieval. A query encoder represents the user's interaction history and target-item metadata, while a statement encoder maps candidate explanations into a shared embedding space. Both encoders are jointly adapted through multi-positive contrastive learning to learn personalized relevance. Experiments on Amazon Beauty, Amazon Toys, and Yelp show that LMStaR achieves the highest NDCG@1 across all three domains, outperforming CLER by 1.06--8.25 points (+11.8--65.9%). It also leads top-five ranking on both Amazon datasets, although CLER remains stronger on Yelp. Task-specific adaptation improves all five evaluated backbones and transfers across domains without target-domain fine-tuning. Counterfactual analyses further reveal the importance of user-specific histories. These findings highlight the potential of task-adapted language models for personalized explanation ranking.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Rank, Don't Generate: Statement-level Ranking for Explainable Recommendation

Textual explanations, generated with large language models (LLMs), are increasingly used to justify recommendations. Yet, evaluating these explanations remains a critical challenge. We advocate a shift in objective: rank, don't generate. We formalize explainable recommendation as a statement-level ranking problem, where systems rank candidate explanatory statements derived from reviews and return the top-k as explanation. This formulation mitigates hallucination by construction and enables fine-grained factual analysis. It also models factor importance through relevance scores and supports standardized, reproducible evaluation with established ranking metrics. Meaningful assessment, however, requires each statement to be explanatory (item facts affecting user experience), atomic (one opinion about one aspect), and unique (paraphrases consolidated), which is challenging to obtain from noisy reviews. We address this with (i) an LLM-based extraction pipeline producing explanatory and atomic statements, and (ii) a scalable, semantic clustering method consolidating paraphrases to enforce uniqueness. Building on this pipeline, we introduce StaR, a benchmark for statement ranking in explainable recommendation, constructed from four Amazon Reviews 2014 product categories. We evaluate popularity-based baselines and state-of-the-art models under global-level (all statements) and item-level (target item statements) ranking. Popularity baselines are competitive in global-level ranking but outperform state-of-the-art models on average in item-level ranking, exposing critical limitations in personalized explanation ranking.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

On the Factual Consistency of Text-based Explainable Recommendation Models

Text-based explainable recommendation aims to generate natural-language explanations that justify item recommendations, to improve user trust and system transparency. Although recent advances leverage LLMs to produce fluent outputs, a critical question remains underexplored: are these explanations factually consistent with the available evidence? We introduce a comprehensive framework for evaluating the factual consistency of text-based explainable recommenders. We design a prompting-based pipeline that uses LLMs to extract atomic explanatory statements from reviews, thereby constructing a ground truth that isolates and focuses on their factual content. Applying this pipeline to five categories from the Amazon Reviews dataset, we create augmented benchmarks for fine-grained evaluation of explanation quality. We further propose statement-level alignment metrics that combine LLM- and NLI-based approaches to assess both factual consistency and relevance of generated explanations. Across extensive experiments on six state-of-the-art explainable recommendation models, we uncover a critical gap: while models achieve high semantic similarity scores (BERTScore F1: 0.81-0.90), all our factuality metrics reveal alarmingly low performance (LLM-based statement-level precision: 4.38%-32.88%). These findings underscore the need for factuality-aware evaluation in explainable recommendation and provide a foundation for developing more trustworthy explanation systems.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2025

ELIXIR: Efficient and LIghtweight model for eXplaIning Recommendations

Collaborative filtering drives many successful recommender systems but struggles with fine-grained user-item interactions and explainability. As users increasingly seek transparent recommendations, generating textual explanations through language models has become a critical research area. Existing methods employ either RNNs or Transformers. However, RNN-based approaches fail to leverage the capabilities of pre-trained Transformer models, whereas Transformer-based methods often suffer from suboptimal adaptation and neglect aspect modeling, which is crucial for personalized explanations. We propose ELIXIR (Efficient and LIghtweight model for eXplaIning Recommendations), a multi-task model combining rating prediction with personalized review generation. ELIXIR jointly learns global and aspect-specific representations of users and items, optimizing overall rating, aspect-level ratings, and review generation, with personalized attention to emphasize aspect importance. Based on a T5-small (60M) model, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our aspect-based architecture in guiding text generation in a personalized context, where state-of-the-art approaches exploit much larger models but fail to match user preferences as well. Experimental results on TripAdvisor and RateBeer demonstrate that ELIXIR significantly outperforms strong baseline models, especially in review generation.

cs.IR↗