arXiv subjects

Benedikt Ahrens

Publications and source records attributed to Benedikt Ahrens.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Verification of a DPLL Transition System in Rocq

We present a formal verification of an abstract transition-system presentation of the Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland (DPLL) procedure in the Rocq proof assistant. Following Nieuwenhuis et al., SAT solving is modeled as a set of rule-based transitions between states rather than as a concrete algorithm. We formalize the syntax and semantics of propositional formulas, define the classical and base DPLL transition systems, and prove their key metatheoretic properties. In particular, we establish correctness and completeness with respect to satisfiability, and we prove termination by showing that the transition relation is well-founded. The formalization extends the original abstract system by also including the pure literal rule. Building on the verified transition system, we introduce an abstract notion of strategy and derive a terminating solver from any strategy satisfying suitable conditions. We then implement a concrete strategy in Rocq and show that it satisfies the strategy specification.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Rzk: a Proof Assistant for Synthetic $\infty$-Categories

Homotopy type theory (HoTT) is a type theory that allows for synthetic reasoning about $\infty$-groupoids. Several proof assistants (such as Rocq and Agda) implement variants of HoTT. Directed type theory is a type theory for synthetic reasoning about $\infty$-categories, where morphisms (or paths) of dimension 1 are not necessarily invertible. Among the proposals for directed type theory, the most developed is Riehl and Shulman's simplicial type theory (RSTT), based on simplicial shapes such as directed intervals and triangles. We present Rzk, a proof assistant implementing (a refinement of) RSTT for synthetic reasoning about $\infty$-categories. Specifically, the type theory implemented by Rzk is a computational variant of RSTT adjusted to make type checking practical. We define a translation from RSTT to Rzk and prove that it is sensible: every RSTT proof translates to an Rzk proof (faithfulness), and Rzk proves nothing new about RSTT types (conservativity). We also give a tutorial introduction to proving in Rzk, and describe its implementation, including the type-checking algorithm and the automated prover for the logic of shapes.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Comparing semantic frameworks for dependently-sorted algebraic theories

Algebraic theories with dependency between sorts form the structural core of Martin-Löf type theory and similar systems. Their denotational semantics are typically studied using categorical techniques; many different categorical structures have been introduced to model them (contextual categories, categories with families, display map categories, etc.) Comparisons of these models are scattered throughout the literature, and a detailed, big-picture analysis of their relationships has been lacking. We aim to provide a clear and comprehensive overview of the relationships between as many such models as possible. Specifically, we take *comprehension categories* as a unifying language and show how almost all established notions of model embed as sub-2-categories (usually full) of the 2-category of comprehension categories.

math.CT↗

arXiv2026

2-Functoriality of Initial Semantics, and Applications

Initial semantics aims to model inductive structures and their properties, and to provide them with recursion principles respecting these properties. An ubiquitous example is the fold operator for lists. We are concerned with initial semantics that model languages with variable binding and their substitution structure, and that provide substitution-safe recursion principles. There are different approaches to implementing languages with variable binding depending on the choice of representation for contexts and free variables, such as unscoped syntax, or well-scoped syntax with finite or infinite contexts. Abstractly, each approach corresponds to choosing a different monoidal category to model contexts and binding, each choice yielding a different notion of "model" for the same abstract specification (or "signature"). In this work, we provide tools to compare and relate the models obtained from a signature for different choices of monoidal category. We do so by showing that initial semantics naturally has a 2-categorical structure when parametrized by the monoidal category modeling contexts. We thus can relate models obtained from different choices of monoidal categories provided the monoidal categories themselves are related. In particular, we use our results to relate the models of the different implementation -- de Bruijn vs locally nameless, finite vs infinite contexts -- , and to provide a generalized recursion principle for simply-typed syntax.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2026

Category Theory for Programming

In these lecture notes, we give a brief introduction to some elements of category theory. The choice of topics is guided by applications to functional programming. Firstly, we study initial algebras, which provide a mathematical characterization of datatypes and recursive functions on them. Secondly, we study monads, which give a mathematical framework for effects in functional languages. The notes include many problems and solutions.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2025

From Semantics to Syntax: A Type Theory for Comprehension Categories

Recent models of intensional type theory have been constructed in algebraic weak factorization systems (AWFSs). AWFSs give rise to comprehension categories that feature non-trivial morphisms between types; these morphisms are not used in the standard interpretation of Martin-Löf type theory in comprehension categories. We develop a type theory that internalizes morphisms between types, reflecting this semantic feature back into syntax. Our type theory comes with $Π$-, $Σ$-, and identity types. We discuss how it can be viewed as an extension of Martin-Löf type theory with coercive subtyping, as sketched by Coraglia and Emmenegger. We furthermore define semantic structure that interprets our type theory and prove a soundness result. Finally, we exhibit many examples of the semantic structure, yielding a plethora of interpretations.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2025

Scott's Representation Theorem and the Univalent Karoubi Envelope

Lambek and Scott constructed a correspondence between simply-typed lambda calculi and Cartesian closed categories. Scott's Representation Theorem is a cousin to this result for untyped lambda calculi. It states that every untyped lambda calculus arises from a reflexive object in some category. We present a formalization of Scott's Representation Theorem in univalent foundations, in the (Rocq-)UniMath library. Specifically, we implement two proofs of that theorem, one by Scott and one by Hyland. We also explain the role of the Karoubi envelope -- a categorical construction -- in the proofs and the impact the chosen foundation has on this construction. Finally, we report on some automation we have implemented for the reduction of $λ$-terms.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

A Unified Framework for Initial Semantics

Initial semantics aims to capture inductive structures and their properties as initial objects in suitable categories. We focus on the initial semantics aiming to model the syntax and substitution structure of programming languages with variable binding as initial objects. Three distinct yet similar approaches to initial semantics have been proposed. An initial semantics result was first proved by Fiore, Plotkin, and Turi using Σ-monoids in their seminal paper published at LICS'99. Alternative frameworks were later introduced by Hirschowitz and Maggesi using modules over monads, and by Matthes and Uustalu using heterogeneous substitution systems. Since then, all approaches have been significantly developed by numerous researchers. While similar, the links between this different approaches remain unclear. This is especially the case as the literature is difficult to access, since it was mostly published in (short) conference papers without proofs, and contains many technical variations and evolutions. In this work, we introduce a framework based on monoidal categories that unifies these three distinct approaches to initial semantics, by suitably generalizing and combining them. Doing so we show that modules over monoids provide an abstract and easy to manipulate framework, that Σ-monoids and strengths naturally arise when stating and proving an initiality theorem, and that heterogeneous substitution systems enable us to prove the initiality theorem modularly. Moreover, to clarify the literature, we provide an extensive overview of related work using our framework as a cornerstone to explain the links between the different approaches and their variations.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2025

Algebraic Presentations of Type Dependency

C-systems were defined by Cartmell as the algebraic structures that correspond exactly to generalised algebraic theories. B-systems were defined by Voevodsky in his quest to formulate and prove an initiality conjecture for type theories. They play a crucial role in Voevodsky's construction of a syntactic C-system from a term monad. In this work, we construct an equivalence between the category of C-systems and the category of B-systems, thus proving a conjecture by Voevodsky. We construct this equivalence as the restriction of an equivalence between more general structures, called CE-systems and E-systems, respectively. To this end, we identify C-systems and B-systems as "stratified" CE-systems and E-systems, respectively; that is, systems whose contexts are built iteratively via context extension, starting from the empty context.

math.CT↗

arXiv2024

Substitution for Non-Wellfounded Syntax with Binders through Monoidal Categories

We describe a generic construction of non-wellfounded syntax involving variable binding and its monadic substitution operation. Our construction of the syntax and its substitution takes place in category theory, notably by using monoidal categories and strong functors between them. A language is specified by a multi-sorted binding signature, say Σ. First, we provide sufficient criteria for Σ to generate a language of possibly infinite terms, through ω-continuity. Second, we construct a monadic substitution operation for the language generated by Σ. A cornerstone in this construction is a mild generalization of the notion of heterogeneous substitution systems developed by Matthes and Uustalu; such a system encapsulates the necessary corecursion scheme for implementing substitution. The results are formalized in the Coq proof assistant, through the UniMath library of univalent mathematics.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2024

Insights From Univalent Foundations: A Case Study Using Double Categories

Category theory unifies mathematical concepts, aiding comparisons across structures by incorporating objects and morphisms, which capture their interactions. It has influenced areas of computer science such as automata theory, functional programming, and semantics. Certain objects naturally exhibit two classes of morphisms, leading to the concept of a double category, which has found applications in computing science (e.g., ornaments, profunctor optics, denotational semantics). The emergence of diverse categorical structures motivated a unified framework for category theory. However, unlike other mathematical objects, classification of categorical structures faces challenges due to various relevant equivalences. This poses significant challenges when pursuing the formalization of categories and restricts the applicability of powerful techniques, such as transport along equivalences. This work contends that univalent foundations offers a suitable framework for classifying different categorical structures based on desired notions of equivalences, and remedy the challenges when formalizing categories. The richer notion of equality in univalent foundations makes the equivalence of a categorical structure an inherent part of its structure. We concretely apply this analysis to double categorical structures. We characterize and formalize various definitions in Coq UniMath, including (pseudo) double categories and double bicategories, up to chosen equivalences. We also establish univalence principles, making chosen equivalences part of the double categorical structure, analyzing strict double setcategories (invariant under isomorphisms), pseudo double setcategories (invariant under isomorphisms), univalent pseudo double categories (invariant under vertical equivalences) and univalent double bicategories (invariant under gregarious equivalences).

math.CT↗

arXiv2024

An Introduction to Different Approaches to Initial Semantics

Characterizing programming languages with variable binding as initial objects, was first achieved by Fiore, Plotkin, and Turi in their seminal paper published at LICS'99. To do so, in particular to prove initiality theorems, they developed a framework based on monoidal categories, functors with strengths, and $Σ$-monoids. An alternative approach using modules over monads was later introduced by Hirschowitz and Maggesi, for endofunctor categories, that is, for particular monoidal categories. This approach has the advantage of providing a more general and abstract definition of signatures and models; however, no general initiality result is known for this notion of signature. Furthermore, Matthes and Uustalu provided a categorical formalism for constructing (initial) monads via Mendler-style recursion, that can also be used for initial semantics. The different approaches have been developed further in several articles. However, in practice, the literature is difficult to access, and links between the different strands of work remain underexplored. In the present work, we give an introduction to initial semantics that encompasses the three different strands. We develop a suitable "pushout" of Hirschowitz and Maggesi's framework with Fiore's, and rely on Matthes and Uustalu's formalism to provide modular proofs. For this purpose, we generalize both Hirschowitz and Maggesi's framework, and Matthes and Uustalu's formalism to the general setting of monoidal categories studied by Fiore and collaborators. Moreover, we provide fully worked out presentation of some basic instances of the literature, and an extensive discussion of related work explaining the links between the different approaches.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Univalent Double Categories

Category theory is a branch of mathematics that provides a formal framework for understanding the relationship between mathematical structures. To this end, a category not only incorporates the data of the desired objects, but also "morphisms", which capture how different objects interact with each other. Category theory has found many applications in mathematics and in computer science, for example in functional programming. Double categories are a natural generalization of categories which incorporate the data of two separate classes of morphisms, allowing a more nuanced representation of relationships and interactions between objects. Similar to category theory, double categories have been successfully applied to various situations in mathematics and computer science, in which objects naturally exhibit two types of morphisms. Examples include categories themselves, but also lenses, petri nets, and spans. While categories have already been formalized in a variety of proof assistants, double categories have received far less attention. In this paper we remedy this situation by presenting a formalization of double categories via the proof assistant Coq, relying on the Coq UniMath library. As part of this work we present two equivalent formalizations of the definition of a double category, an unfolded explicit definition and a second definition which exhibits excellent formal properties via 2-sided displayed categories. As an application of the formal approach we establish a notion of univalent double category along with a univalence principle: equivalences of univalent double categories coincide with their identities

math.CT↗

arXiv2023

Bicategorical type theory: semantics and syntax

We develop semantics and syntax for bicategorical type theory. Bicategorical type theory features contexts, types, terms, and directed reductions between terms. This type theory is naturally interpreted in a class of structured bicategories. We start by developing the semantics, in the form of comprehension bicategories. Examples of comprehension bicategories are plentiful; we study both specific examples as well as classes of examples constructed from other data. From the notion of comprehension bicategory, we extract the syntax of bicategorical type theory, that is, judgment forms and structural inference rules. We prove soundness of the rules by giving an interpretation in any comprehension bicategory. The semantic aspects of our work are fully checked in the Coq proof assistant, based on the UniMath library.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Formalizing Monoidal Categories and Actions for Syntax with Binders

We discuss some aspects of our work on the mechanization of syntax and semantics in the UniMath library, based on the proof assistant Coq. We focus on experiences where Coq (as a type-theoretic proof assistant with decidable typechecking) made us use more theory or helped us to see theory more clearly.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2023

Univalent Monoidal Categories

Univalent categories constitute a well-behaved and useful notion of category in univalent foundations. The notion of univalence has subsequently been generalized to bicategories and other structures in (higher) category theory. Here, we zoom in on monoidal categories and study them in a univalent setting. Specifically, we show that the bicategory of univalent monoidal categories is univalent. Furthermore, we construct a Rezk completion for monoidal categories: we show how any monoidal category is weakly equivalent to a univalent monoidal category, universally. We have fully formalized these results in UniMath, a library of univalent mathematics in the Coq proof assistant.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2022

The Univalence Principle

The Univalence Principle is the statement that equivalent mathematical structures are indistinguishable. We prove a general version of this principle that applies to all set-based, categorical, and higher-categorical structures defined in a non-algebraic and space-based style, as well as models of higher-order theories such as topological spaces. In particular, we formulate a general definition of indiscernibility for objects of any such structure, and a corresponding univalence condition that generalizes Rezk's completeness condition for Segal spaces and ensures that all equivalences of structures are levelwise equivalences. Our work builds on Makkai's First-Order Logic with Dependent Sorts, but is expressed in Voevodsky's Univalent Foundations (UF), extending previous work on the Structure Identity Principle and univalent categories in UF. This enables indistinguishability to be expressed simply as identification, and yields a formal theory that is interpretable in classical homotopy theory, but also in other higher topos models. It follows that Univalent Foundations is a fully equivalence-invariant foundation for higher-categorical mathematics, as intended by Voevodsky.

math.CT↗

arXiv2022

Bicategories in Univalent Foundations

We develop bicategory theory in univalent foundations. Guided by the notion of univalence for (1-)categories studied by Ahrens, Kapulkin, and Shulman, we define and study univalent bicategories. To construct examples of univalent bicategories in a modular fashion, we develop displayed bicategories, an analog of displayed 1-categories introduced by Ahrens and Lumsdaine. We demonstrate the applicability of this notion, and prove that several bicategories of interest are univalent. Among these are the bicategory of univalent categories with families and the bicategory of pseudofunctors between univalent bicategories. Furthermore, we show that every bicategory with univalent hom-categories is weakly equivalent to a univalent bicategory. All of our work is formalized in Coq as part of the UniMath library of univalent mathematics.

math.CT↗