arXiv subjects

Benjamin M. Ampel

Publications and source records attributed to Benjamin M. Ampel.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Authority Bias in Conversational Search Engines for Academic Paper Recommendation

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as conversational search engines for academic literature, yet whether they judge papers on content or on authority signals has not been tested causally. We investigate authority bias: systematic preference for papers based on author prestige, venue, and citations rather than content. Holding title and abstract constant, we vary authority metadata across three counterfactual conditions (original, flipped, boosted) over eight LLMs (five open-weight and three frontier closed-weight) in an in-context, single-turn, top-1 recommendation setting. Our experiments show that authority bias is substantial and directional, varies markedly across models, and is only partially addressable through prompt-level debiasing. We further document a say-do gap: debiasing instructions suppress authority mentions far faster than authority-driven flips, so surface auditing systematically underestimates behavioral bias.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Explainability in Media Bias Detection

Detecting media bias automatically is difficult because biased framing is often subtle, yet in domains such as news analysis, accurate predictions alone are insufficient without explanations that reflect the model's underlying reasoning. We present a multi-dimensional evaluation of explainability in encoder-based media bias detection using the Bias Annotations By Experts (BABE) dataset. Specifically, we study BERT and RoBERTa as classifiers (base and large variants) along three complementary axes: predictive performance, explanation plausibility (token-level alignment with expert rationales), and mechanistic faithfulness (whether compact sets of attention heads recover predictive signal under counterfactual rationale masking). To induce variation in plausibility, we additionally investigate attention-supervised finetuning, which incorporates expert rationale annotations as an auxiliary training signal. Attention supervision serves as an intervention on attribution plausibility, while the effectiveness of attribution methods varies substantially across architectures. Circuit analysis further reveals substantial variation in mechanistic recoverability across architectures, suggesting that model scale alone does not determine circuit compressibility. Taken together, our findings suggest that predictive performance, attribution plausibility, and mechanistic faithfulness characterize different aspects of model behavior and should be evaluated separately when studying explainability in media bias detection.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Vendor-Conditioned Contrastive Learning for Predicting Organizational Cyber Threat Targets

Cyberattacks cause billions of dollars in damage annually, with malicious hackers often sharing exploit code and techniques on underground forums. Identifying which organizations are targeted by these exploits is critical for proactive Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI). To address that gap, we propose Temporal Representation and Classification of Exploits (TRACE), a vendor-conditioned contrastive learning framework built on CySecBERT that jointly optimizes organizational target classification and vendor-coherent representations while evaluating robustness under temporal distribution shift. Unlike prior work limited to small, single-source datasets, we leverage a large-scale, multi-source corpus spanning 9 exploit databases and hacker forums, comprising 352,866 posts collected over three decades, yielding a 129,126-sample dataset across seven organizational categories. In the temporal out-of-distribution evaluation, TRACE achieves macro F1=97.00\%, substantially outperforming 17 benchmark classical ML methods, deep learning with GloVe/FastText embeddings, and pretrained transformer models.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

HackerSignal: A Large-Scale Multi-Source Dataset Linking Hacker Community Discourse to the CVE Vulnerability Lifecycle

We introduce HackerSignal, a benchmark for temporal out-of-distribution cyber threat intelligence (CTI) and cross-source CVE linkage. HackerSignal aggregates 7.45 million exact-deduplicated documents from 64 public forum/source identifiers spanning eight source layers and a 36-year window (1990-2026). In contrast to other publicly accessible cybersecurity datasets, HackerSignal is among the first public benchmark datasets that maps the full potential exploit to vulnerability trajectory from hacker community discourse, exploit databases with working and proof of concept exploits, vulnerability advisories, and software fix commits. HackerSignal creates these linkages through a shared CVE identifier space while preserving source-specific release modes to support a range of unique Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled cybersecurity analytics tasks. In this paper, we summarize HackerSignal and illustrate three selected benchmark tasks it uniquely supports: (1) CVE linkage retrieval (cross-source temporal out-of-distribution entity grounding); (2) exploit type classification (8-class vulnerability type prediction with temporal OOD evaluation); and (3) temporal generalization (prospective CVE-disjoint evaluation where C_train and C_test are disjoint). All tasks use temporal splits to evaluate prospective generalization. We release source-shortcut and leakage diagnostics, manual-audit packets, a datasheet, and a release-governance addendum to support the dissemination of the dataset. HackerSignal's code, data, and Croissant metadata are available at hf.co/datasets/BenAmpel/HackerSignal (data) and github.com/BenAmpel/hackersignal (code).

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

Large Language Models for Conducting Advanced Text Analytics Information Systems Research

The exponential growth of digital content has generated massive textual datasets, necessitating the use of advanced analytical approaches. Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as tools that are capable of processing and extracting insights from massive unstructured textual datasets. However, how to leverage LLMs for text analytics Information Systems (IS) research is currently unclear. To assist the IS community in understanding how to operationalize LLMs, we propose a Text Analytics for Information Systems Research (TAISR) framework. Our proposed framework provides detailed recommendations grounded in IS and LLM literature on how to conduct meaningful text analytics IS research for design science, behavioral, and econometric streams. We conducted three business intelligence case studies using our TAISR framework to demonstrate its application in several IS research contexts. We also outline the potential challenges and limitations of adopting LLMs for IS. By offering a systematic approach and evidence of its utility, our TAISR framework contributes to future IS research streams looking to incorporate powerful LLMs for text analytics.

cs.CL↗