arXiv subjects

Bernhard Angele

Publications and source records attributed to Bernhard Angele.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2024

GazeGenie: Enhancing Multi-Line Reading Research with an Innovative User-Friendly Tool

In the study of reading, eye-tracking technology offers unique insights into the time-course of how individuals extract information from text. A significant hurdle in using multi-line paragraph stimuli is the need to align eye gaze position with the correct line. This is made more difficult by positional noise in the eye-tracking data, primarily due to vertical drift, and often necessitates manual intervention. Such manual correction is labor-intensive, subjective, and limits the scalability of research efforts. As a result, automated solutions are desirable, especially those that do not require extensive technical skills and still allow close control over the outcome. To address this, we introduce GazeGenie: a comprehensive software solution designed specifically for researchers in eye-tracking studies on multi-line reading. Accessible via an intuitive web browser-based user interface and easily installed using Docker, GazeGenie streamlines the entire data processing pipeline from parsing fixations from raw data to calculation of word and sentence-based measures based on cleaned and drift-corrected fixations. The software's core features include the recently introduced Dual Input Stream Transformer (DIST) model and various classical algorithms all of which can be combined within a Wisdom of the Crowds (WOC) approach to enhance accuracy in fixation line-assignment. By providing an all-in-one solution for researchers, we hope to make automated fixation alignment more accessible, reducing researchers' reliance on manual intervention in vertical fixation alignment. This should lead to more accurate, efficient, and reproducible analyses of multi-line eye-movement data and pave the way to enabling larger scale studies to be carried out.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Dual input stream transformer for vertical drift correction in eye-tracking reading data

We introduce a novel Dual Input Stream Transformer (DIST) for the challenging problem of assigning fixation points from eye-tracking data collected during passage reading to the line of text that the reader was actually focused on. This post-processing step is crucial for analysis of the reading data due to the presence of noise in the form of vertical drift. We evaluate DIST against eleven classical approaches on a comprehensive suite of nine diverse datasets. We demonstrate that combining multiple instances of the DIST model in an ensemble achieves high accuracy across all datasets. Further combining the DIST ensemble with the best classical approach yields an average accuracy of 98.17 %. Our approach presents a significant step towards addressing the bottleneck of manual line assignment in reading research. Through extensive analysis and ablation studies, we identify key factors that contribute to DIST's success, including the incorporation of line overlap features and the use of a second input stream. Via rigorous evaluation, we demonstrate that DIST is robust to various experimental setups, making it a safe first choice for practitioners in the field.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2016

False Positives and Other Statistical Errors in Standard Analyses of Eye Movements in Reading

In research on eye movements in reading, it is common to analyze a number of canonical dependent measures to study how the effects of a manipulation unfold over time. Although this gives rise to the well-known multiple comparisons problem, i.e. an inflated probability that the null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected (Type I error), it is accepted standard practice not to apply any correction procedures. Instead, there appears to be a widespread belief that corrections are not necessary because the increase in false positives is too small to matter. To our knowledge, no formal argument has ever been presented to justify this assumption. Here, we report a computational investigation of this issue using Monte Carlo simulations. Our results show that, contrary to conventional wisdom, false positives are increased to unacceptable levels when no corrections are applied. Our simulations also show that counter-measures like the Bonferroni correction keep false positives in check while reducing statistical power only moderately. Hence, there is little reason why such corrections should not be made a standard requirement. Further, we discuss three statistical illusions that can arise when statistical power is low, and we show how power can be improved to prevent these illusions. In sum, our work renders a detailed picture of the various types of statistical errors than can occur in studies of reading behavior and we provide concrete guidance about how these errors can be avoided.

stat.AP↗