arXiv subjects

Bingsheng He

Publications and source records attributed to Bingsheng He.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2026

NodeImport: Imbalanced Node Classification with Node Importance Assessment

In real-world applications, node classification on graphs often faces the challenge of class imbalance, where majority classes dominate training, resulting in biased model performance. Traditional GNNs often struggle in such scenarios, as they tend to overfit to majority classes while underrepresenting minority classes. Existing solutions, which either prioritize nodes based on class size or synthesize new nodes for minority classes, often fall short of effectively addressing this imbalance issue. This paper introduces an approach to class-imbalanced node classification by utilizing a balanced meta-set for importance measurement, where a training node is considered significant if it enhances model performance under an unbiased setting. Our method identifies important nodes that can counteract class imbalance and utilizes them for model training, allowing for fine-grained and dynamic node selection throughout the training process. We theoretically derive a formula to directly assess node importance, reducing computational overhead and providing an intuitive threshold for node selection. Guided by this metric, we develop a novel framework that filters valuable labeled, unlabeled, and synthetic nodes that enhance model performance in an unbiased context. A key advantage of this framework is its separation of the synthetic node generation process from the filtering process, ensuring compatibility with various node generation methods. Furthermore, we introduce a strategy to construct a high-quality meta-set that closely approximates the overall feature distribution, ensuring robust representation of each class. We evaluate our framework, NodeImport, across multiple datasets using popular GNN architectures, demonstrating its superiority over existing baselines. Our results highlight the flexibility and effectiveness of the framework in mitigating class imbalance, leading to improved outcomes.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Articulate Intuition or Genuine Analysis? Benchmarking Epistemic Reliability in LLM-as-a-Judge Peer Reviews

When an LLM judge calls a peer review analytical and a human committee calls another review high quality, are they tracking the same thing? We argue they are not, and that the difference matters philosophically. We operationalise Kahneman's dual-process theory into a structured rubric for peer review and release Kahneman4Review, a benchmark of 3,563 rated reviews scored along nine theoretically motivated textual dimensions, eight bias diagnostics, and a continuous reasoning-quality score. Three findings bear on trustworthiness: decision tier is not detectably aligned with the rubric's text-grounded epistemic-quality proxy; public-showcase agentic reviews receive higher raw scores than pooled human reviews, but length and venue explain most of the gap and the samples are not paper-paired; and ICLR review-text diagnostics shift at the 2022--2023 transition, temporally coincident with widespread LLM availability but without identifying its cause. A matched function-probe pilot further shows that the rubric distinguishes textual probes designed to contrast genuine fault-finding with surface fluency. We argue that a trustworthy reliability benchmark for LLM judges must separate analytical form from epistemic function, and propose concrete design choices toward that goal. An interactive demo is available at https://huggingface.co/spaces/nuojohnchen/Kahneman4Review.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

LLM-based Human Simulations Have Not Yet Been Reliable

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed for simulating human behaviors across diverse domains. However, our position is that current LLM-based human simulations remain insufficiently reliable, as evidenced by significant discrepancies between their outcomes and authentic human actions. Our investigation begins with a systematic review of LLM-based human simulations in social, economic, policy, and psychological contexts, identifying their common frameworks, recent advances, and persistent limitations. This review reveals that such discrepancies primarily stem from inherent limitations of LLMs and flaws in simulation design, both of which are examined in detail. Building on these insights, we propose a systematic solution framework that emphasizes enriching data foundations, advancing LLM capabilities, and ensuring robust simulation design to enhance reliability. Finally, we introduce a structured algorithm that operationalizes the proposed framework, aiming to guide credible and human-aligned LLM-based simulations. To facilitate further research, we provide a curated list of related literature and resources at https://github.com/Persdre/awesome-llm-human-simulation.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Multi-Label Node Classification with Label Influence Propagation

Graphs are a complex and versatile data structure used across various domains, with possibly multi-label nodes playing a particularly crucial role. Examples include proteins in PPI networks with multiple functions and users in social or e-commerce networks exhibiting diverse interests. Tackling multi-label node classification (MLNC) on graphs has led to the development of various approaches. Some methods leverage graph neural networks (GNNs) to exploit label co-occurrence correlations, while others incorporate label embeddings to capture label proximity. However, these approaches fail to account for the intricate influences between labels in non-Euclidean graph data. To address this issue, we decompose the message passing process in GNNs into two operations: propagation and transformation. We then conduct a comprehensive analysis and quantification of the influence correlations between labels in each operation. Building on these insights, we propose a novel model, Label Influence Propagation (LIP). Specifically, we construct a label influence graph based on the integrated label correlations. Then, we propagate high-order influences through this graph, dynamically adjusting the learning process by amplifying labels with positive contributions and mitigating those with negative influence. Finally, our framework is evaluated on comprehensive benchmark datasets, consistently outperforming SOTA methods across various settings, demonstrating its effectiveness on MLNC tasks.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Approaching Shannon Bound with Lossless LLM Weight Compression

Large language models (LLMs) now scale to trillions of parameters, driving weight storage into the terabyte regime and creating an acute mismatch with GPU memory capacity. Although lossless compression is widely effective in other domains, it remains underutilized in LLM systems. Through a comprehensive entropy study across models from 1.5B to 405B parameters and numeric formats ranging from bf16 to int4 and AWQ/SQ8, we find that LLM weights contain far less intrinsic randomness than their stored bitwidth implies, their effective entropy is 2-10x lower, indicating that up to a 10x footprint reduction is theoretically achievable without altering any weight values. Leveraging this insight, we introduce a tile-level, on-the-fly lossless decompression framework based on Asymmetric Numeral Systems that aligns decoding with the GEMM tiling pattern of GPU inference. Our design achieves bit-rates within 0.01-0.1 bits of the Shannon limit across a wide range of LLM numerical formats, demonstrating that nearly all statistical redundancy is eliminated. Integrated into the SGLang serving framework with multi-GPU support, our approach increases the maximum batch size of Qwen-14B from 47 to 75, improving throughput by up to 1.2x. On Mixtral-176B, the feasible batch size increases from 20 to 95 (4.8x), yielding up to 1.6x throughput improvement. Compared to state-of-the-art lossless compression approaches NeuZip and DFloat11, our design further improves throughput by up to 11x.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

CrossAlpha: An Annual-Report Benchmark for Cross-Market Factor Research (with LLM Agents)

Cross-market factor research studies whether firm-level signals from one or more markets can predict returns in a target market, but existing public benchmarks do not support cross-market disclosure-to-return evaluation. Building such a benchmark is challenging because filings differ across languages and regulatory systems, disclosure-derived similarity can be biased by common reporting components, and cross-market signals must be evaluated under feasible trading-time alignment. We introduce \textbf{CrossAlpha}, a public annual-report benchmark for cross-market factor research. CrossAlpha addresses these challenges through three corresponding components: \emph{Disclosure Distillation}, which standardises heterogeneous filings into ten-category English business descriptions; \emph{Residual Schema Graph Construction}, which builds PCA-whitened cross-market firm-pair scores from schema-level disclosures; and \emph{Timing-Aligned Evaluation}, which pairs the graph with 11 years of daily OHLCV data to construct forward-return labels under feasible cross-market execution protocols. CrossAlpha covers about 3,600 firms and 10,700 firm-year reports from the United States, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and Hong Kong, and releases about 19M directed firm-pair scores. In experiments, disclosure-derived cross-market peers outperform domestic text, industry-code, and return-correlation peers in the US-to-Japan setting (ICIR 0.39 versus 0.07--0.18), and cross-market sources beat the domestic text baseline in most target markets. CrossAlpha offers an open-sourced, reusable, return-grounded benchmark for cross-market financial NLP.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Hardware-accelerated Aggregation: Unification and Specialization

The high efficiency of domain-specific hardware has sparked substantial interest in adopting accelerators in data analytics systems. Among many choices, GPUs and FPGAs thrived as two popular solutions due to their prevalent deployments in cloud data centers. This paper investigates hardware acceleration solutions for aggregation, a critical data analytics operation. Specifically, we implement aggregation with a unified hardware acceleration framework, which trades efficiency for ease of programming and portability, and then further develop hardware-specific optimizations. We evaluate these solutions on three recent computing hardware platforms: a CPU, a GPU, and an FPGA, with metrics that cover both the performance and energy consumption of on-device and end-to-end processing.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Chain-of-Models: Cross-Model Auditing for Bias-Robust LLM Judges

LLMs increasingly serve as automated judges, but their judgments remain vulnerable to cognitive biases. Existing mitigations mostly rely on prompt-driven debiasing, which is brittle across bias types, or human evaluation, which does not scale. We study \emph{Chain-of-Models} (CoM), an automated audit pipeline in which a second model inspects the first model's reasoning trace before producing the final judgment. The key design question is whether the auditor should be the same model, a same-family model, or a different-family model. Across 9 models from 6 families, 4 cognitive biases, and 4 factual datasets, we find that auditor identity matters in two ways. First, standalone bias resistance does not predict audit effectiveness: Kimi-K2.5 is the strongest standalone model on several biases, yet is a weak auditor for Qwen2.5-72B's biased traces. Second, the best auditor is bias-specific: GPT-4o is strongest on bandwagon, authority, and distraction, while GLM-5 is strongest on sycophancy. We operationalize these findings with a per-bias auditor selection rule that, given the bias type, scores candidates along functional diversity, per-bias standalone resistance, and calibrated audit effectiveness. Under a calibration/test split, the selector reaches the highest accuracy across the four biased slices ($0.884$ vs.\ $0.824$ for the strongest single fixed auditor and $0.805$ for the no-audit baseline). We release data, configurations, and an LLM-agent skill at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/chain-of-models-B585 .

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Reward-Weighted On-Policy Distillation with an Open Property-Equivalence Verifier for NL-to-SVA Generation

LLM-based generation of SystemVerilog Assertions (SVA) is often reported as nearing saturation, with the strongest specialized model reaching ${\sim}76\%$ accuracy on NL2SVA-Human. We show that this aggregate hides a temporal gap: models that appear strong overall still collapse to a few implication templates on bounded-delay and liveness specifications. The core issue is that the dominant recipe, supervised fine-tuning on NL/SVA pairs, optimizes token-level mimicry rather than the \emph{property equivalence} that defines SVA correctness. We introduce \emph{Reward-Weighted On-Policy Distillation} (RWOPD), an on-policy distillation method that samples student rollouts, scores them with an open SymbiYosys+Z3 Property-Equivalence Checker (PEC), and applies a verifier-reward-weighted forward-KL gradient from a frozen 14B teacher on verifier-passable rollouts. This keeps the supervision dense at every response token while grounding both selection and loss weight in property-equivalent behavior. RWOPD distills CodeV-SVA-14B into a Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct student that sets a new state of the art on NL2SVA-Human and NL2SVA-Machine across pass@1, pass@5, and pass@10, surpassing both specialized prior SOTA models and 671B general-purpose baselines.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

Is Agentic AI Ready for Real-World Hardware Engineering? A Deep Dive with Phoenix-bench

We ask whether agentic AI systems built for software engineering transfer to realistic hardware engineering. Existing hardware LLM benchmarks isolate sub-tasks but none jointly requires repository navigation, hierarchy-aware localization, Electronic Design Automation (EDA) executable verification, and maintenance-style patching. We introduce \textbf{Phoenix-bench}, a synchronized corpus of 511 verified Verilator instances from 114 GitHub repositories, each shipped with the developer patch, design-flow labels, fail-to-pass and pass-to-pass testbenches, and a Docker-pinned EDA environment so resolved-rate differences reflect agent behavior rather than toolchain availability. Using Phoenix-bench we run a uniform evaluation of four commercial agents and eight open-source agentic structures across four LLM backbones, plus two diagnostic interventions (file-level oracle localization and one round of testbench-log feedback). Three findings emerge. (i)~Software and hardware are fundamentally different engineering tasks: the same agent loses 37\% to 58\% from SWE-bench Verified to Phoenix-bench because hardware bugs propagate across parallel instantiated modules through signal flow rather than along a software-style call graph, and software-tuned agents stop at the symptom file instead of tracing back through the instantiation chain. (ii)~Failures concentrate on design control-flow / finite state machine (FSM) bugs, verification testbench bugs, and hard cases that demand cross-hierarchy signal-flow tracking and coordinated multi-file edits. (iii)~Localization granularity matters far more than localization itself: a perfect file-level oracle yields only $+1.4$\% because the agent then breaks files that did not need editing, while a single round of test case feedback lifts resolved rate by $42$\% to $45$\% because the test case tells \emph{where} the bug is and \emph{what} the fix has to look like.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

XtraMAC: An Efficient MAC Architecture for Mixed-Precision LLM Inference on FPGA

The widespread adoption of mixed-precision quantization in large language models (LLMs) has created demand for hardware that can efficiently perform multiply-accumulate (MAC) operations across mixed datatypes and switch datatypes at runtime. Existing FPGA-based MAC solutions fall short due to limitations in fixed-datatype design, inefficient spatial or temporal resource sharing, and poor support for mixed-precision execution. These limitations collectively lead to under-utilization of DSP resources, limiting achievable parallelism and throughput. In this work, we present XtraMAC, a novel MAC architecture that unifies integer, floating-point, and mixed-precision operations within a single, datatype-adaptive microarchitecture. XtraMAC decomposes all supported MAC formats into a shared integer mantissa product with lightweight sign and exponent handling, enabling dynamic operand packing and efficient DSP resource sharing with constant latency and initiation interval of one across all datatypes. Evaluated on an AMD Xilinx U55c FPGA, XtraMAC achieves 1.4-2.0x higher compute density, reduces per-operation LUT, FF, and DSP consumption by 27-51%, and delivers up to 1.9x greater energy efficiency and 1.2x speedup on representative mixed-precision LLM workloads. The implementation of XtraMAC is open-sourced at https://github.com/Xtra-Computing/XtraMAC.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Prompt-Induced Lies: Investigating LLM Deception on Benign Prompts

Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely deployed in reasoning, planning, and decision-making tasks, making their trustworthiness critical. A significant and underexplored risk is intentional deception, where an LLM deliberately fabricates or conceals information to serve a hidden objective. Existing studies typically induce deception by explicitly setting a hidden objective through prompting or fine-tuning, which may not reflect real-world human-LLM interactions. Moving beyond such human-induced deception, we investigate LLMs' self-initiated deception on benign prompts. To address the absence of ground truth, we propose a framework based on Contact Searching Questions (CSQ). This framework introduces two statistical metrics derived from psychological principles to quantify the likelihood of deception. The first, the Deceptive Intention Score, measures the model's bias toward a hidden objective. The second, the Deceptive Behavior Score, measures the inconsistency between the LLM's internal belief and its expressed output. Evaluating 16 leading LLMs, we find that both metrics rise in parallel and escalate with task difficulty for most models. Moreover, increasing model capacity does not always reduce deception, posing a significant challenge for future LLM development.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

LLM DNA: Tracing Model Evolution via Functional Representations

The explosive growth of large language models (LLMs) has created a vast but opaque landscape: millions of models exist, yet their evolutionary relationships through fine-tuning, distillation, or adaptation are often undocumented or unclear, complicating LLM management. Existing methods are limited by task specificity, fixed model sets, or strict assumptions about tokenizers or architectures. Inspired by biological DNA, we address these limitations by mathematically defining LLM DNA as a low-dimensional, bi-Lipschitz representation of functional behavior. We prove that LLM DNA satisfies inheritance and genetic determinism properties and establish the existence of DNA. Building on this theory, we derive a general, scalable, training-free pipeline for DNA extraction. In experiments across 305 LLMs, DNA aligns with prior studies on limited subsets and achieves superior or competitive performance on specific tasks. Beyond these tasks, DNA comparisons uncover previously undocumented relationships among LLMs. We further construct the evolutionary tree of LLMs using phylogenetic algorithms, which align with shifts from encoder-decoder to decoder-only architectures, reflect temporal progression, and reveal distinct evolutionary speeds across LLM families.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Robust Multimodal Recommendation via Graph Retrieval-Enhanced Modality Completion

Multimodal data plays a critical role in web-based recommendation systems, where information from diverse modalities such as vision and text enhances representation learning. However, real-world multimodal datasets often suffer from modality incompleteness due to sensor failures, annotation scarcity, or privacy constraints, which substantially degrade model performance and reliability. One effective solution to address this issue is modality completion, which reconstructs missing features to provide modality-complete graphs for downstream tasks. Given a query node with missing multimodal features, existing modality completion methods typically infer information from the node itself or its neighbors to reconstruct the missing modality. However, these methods may overlook semantically relevant context in the graph, which contains valuable cues that are non-trivial to capture through simple methods like neighborhood aggregation. In this work, we propose GRE-MC, a Graph Retrieval-Enhanced Modality Completion framework, to overcome these limitations. By introducing a modality-aware subgraph retrieval mechanism, GRE-MC selects semantically relevant subgraphs from the entire graph, providing richer contextual information for completing missing modalities. Subsequently, a graph transformer jointly encodes the query node and the retrieved subgraph via global attention to complete the missing features, while a learnable sparse-routing codebook regularizes latent embeddings into compact bases for improved robustness. Extensive experiments on multimodal recommendation benchmarks demonstrate that GRE-MC consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, validating the effectiveness of subgraph retrieval and joint-encoding graph transformer for robust modality completion.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

XtraGPT: Context-Aware and Controllable Academic Paper Revision via Human-AI Collaboration

Despite the growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in academic workflows, their capabilities remain limited in supporting high-quality scientific writing. Most existing systems are designed for general-purpose scientific text generation and fail to meet the sophisticated demands of research communication beyond surface-level polishing, for example, maintaining conceptual coherence across sections. Furthermore, academic writing is inherently iterative and revision-driven, a process that is not well supported by direct prompting-based paradigms. To address these scenarios, we propose a human-AI collaboration framework for academic paper revision, centered on criteria-guided intent alignment and context-aware modeling. To validate the framework, we curate a dataset of 7,000 research papers from top-tier venues, annotated with 140,000 instruction--response pairs that reflect realistic, section-level scientific revisions. We instantiate the framework in XtraGPT, the first suite of open-source LLMs (1.5B to 14B parameters) specifically fine-tuned for context-aware academic paper revision. Extensive experiments show that XtraGPT significantly outperforms same-scale baselines and rivals the quality of proprietary counterparts. Both automated preference assessments and human evaluations confirm the effectiveness of XtraGPT in improving scientific drafts. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/Xtra-Computing/XtraGPT and https://huggingface.co/collections/Xtra-Computing/xtragpt.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Diversity Collapse in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: Structural Coupling and Collective Failure in Open-Ended Idea Generation

Multi-agent systems (MAS) are increasingly used for open-ended idea generation, driven by the expectation that collective interaction will broaden the exploration diversity. However, when and why such collaboration truly expands the solution space remains unclear. We present a systematic empirical study of diversity in MAS-based ideation across three bottom-up levels: model intelligence, agent cognition, and system dynamics. At the model level, we identify a compute efficiency paradox, where stronger, highly aligned models yield diminishing marginal diversity despite higher per-sample quality. At the cognition level, authority-driven dynamics suppress semantic diversity compared to junior-dominated groups. At the system level, group-size scaling yields diminishing returns and dense communication topologies accelerate premature convergence. We characterize these outcomes as collective failures emerging from structural coupling, a process where interaction inadvertently contracts agent exploration and triggers diversity collapse. Our analysis shows that this collapse arises primarily from the interaction structure rather than inherent model insufficiency, highlighting the importance of preserving independence and disagreement when designing MAS for creative tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/Xtra-Computing/MAS_Diversity.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

InfiniLoRA: Disaggregated Multi-LoRA Serving for Large Language Models

LoRA enables efficient customization of LLMs and is widely used in multi-tenant and multi-task serving. However, emerging model architectures such as MoE significantly increase LoRA memory cost, making existing coupled LoRA serving designs poorly scalable and prone to tail-latency inflation. We present InfiniLoRA, a disaggregated LoRA serving system that decouples LoRA execution from base-model inference. InfiniLoRA introduces a shared LoRA Server with parallelism-aware execution, SLO-driven provisioning, and critical-path optimizations, including GPU-initiated communication and hardware-specialized LoRA kernels. Experiments show that InfiniLoRA can achieve an average $3.05\times$ increase in serviceable request rate under strict latency SLOs, and improve the percentage of LoRA adapters satisfying the SLO requirement by 54.0\%.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Making Bias Non-Predictive: Training Robust LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly serve as reasoners and automated evaluators, yet they remain susceptible to cognitive biases -- often altering their reasoning when faced with spurious prompt-level cues such as consensus claims or authority appeals.} Existing mitigations via prompting or supervised fine-tuning fail to generalize, as they modify surface behavior without changing the optimization objective that makes bias cues attractive. We propose \textbf{Epistemic Independence Training (EIT)}, a reinforcement learning framework grounded in a key principle: to learn independence, bias cues must be made non-predictive of reward. EIT operationalizes this through a balanced conflict strategy where bias signals are equally likely to support correct and incorrect answers, combined with a reward design that penalizes bias-following without rewarding bias agreement. Experiments on Qwen3-4B demonstrate that EIT improves both accuracy and robustness under adversarial biases, while preserving performance when bias aligns with truth. Notably, models trained only on bandwagon bias generalize to unseen bias types such as authority and distraction, indicating that EIT induces transferable epistemic independence rather than bias-specific heuristics. \revised{EIT further generalizes across benchmarks (MedQA, HellaSwag), model families (Llama-3.2-3B), and scales (Qwen3-8B), and outperforms distribution-shift methods (GroupDRO, IRM) without requiring environment labels.} Code and data are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/bias-mitigation-with-rl-BC47

cs.CY↗