Bjoern Bornkamp | Searcharxiv

arXiv2024

Correcting for confounding in longitudinal experiments: positioning non-linear mixed effects modeling as implementation of standardization using latent conditional exchangeability

Non-linear mixed effects modeling and simulation (NLME M&S) is evaluated to be used for standardization with longitudinal data in presence of confounders. Standardization is a well-known method in causal inference to correct for confounding by analyzing and combining results from subgroups of patients. We show that non-linear mixed effects modeling is a particular implementation of standardization that conditions on individual parameters described by the random effects of the mixed effects model. Our motivation is that in pharmacometrics NLME M&S is routinely used to analyze clinical trials and to predict and compare potential outcomes of the same patient population under different treatment regimens. Such a comparison is a causal question sometimes referred to as causal prediction. Nonetheless, NLME M&S is rarely positioned as a method for causal prediction. As an example, a simulated clinical trial is used that assumes treatment confounder feedback in which early outcomes can cause deviations from the planned treatment schedule. Being interested in the outcome for the hypothetical situation that patients adhere to the planned treatment schedule, we put assumptions in a causal diagram. From the causal diagram, conditional independence assumptions are derived either using latent conditional exchangeability, conditioning on the individual parameters, or using sequential conditional exchangeability, conditioning on earlier outcomes. Both conditional independencies can be used to estimate the estimand of interest, e.g., with standardization, and they give unbiased estimates.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2021

Connecting Instrumental Variable methods for causal inference to the Estimand Framework

Causal inference methods are gaining increasing prominence in pharmaceutical drug development in light of the recently published addendum on estimands and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials to the E9 guideline of the International Council for Harmonisation. The E9 addendum emphasises the need to account for post-randomization or `intercurrent' events that can potentially influence the interpretation of a treatment effect estimate at a trial's conclusion. Instrumental Variables (IV) methods have been used extensively in economics, epidemiology and academic clinical studies for `causal inference', but less so in the pharmaceutical industry setting until now. In this tutorial paper we review the basic tools for causal inference, including graphical diagrams and potential outcomes, as well as several conceptual frameworks that an IV analysis can sit within. We discuss in detail how to map these approaches to the Treatment Policy, Principal Stratum and Hypothetical `estimand strategies' introduced in the E9 addendum, and provide details of their implementation using standard regression models. Specific attention is given to discussing the assumptions each estimation strategy relies on in order to be consistent, the extent to which they can be empirically tested and sensitivity analyses in which specific assumptions can be relaxed. We finish by applying the methods described to simulated data closely matching two recent pharmaceutical trials to further motivate and clarify the ideas

stat.ME↗