arXiv subjects

Bruno Cavalar

Publications and source records attributed to Bruno Cavalar.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ETH-Hardness of Learning Monotone Circuits and Approximating Their Size

We show the following hardness results for monotone learning and approximation of monotone circuit size: 1. Under the Randomised Exponential-Time Hypothesis (rETH), it requires time $n^{\Omega(\log n)}$ to PAC-learn monotone formulas with $n$ input bits and size $s(n) = n$ by monotone circuits of size $n^{(\log n)^{1-\epsilon}}$, for every $\epsilon > 0$. 2. Under the Randomised Exponential-Time Hypothesis (rETH), for any $\delta > 0$, there is a polynomially bounded function $m$ such that $m^{1-\delta}$-multiplicatively approximating the minimum monotone circuit size of a monotone function consistent with a sequence of $m(n)$ labelled examples $\{(x_i, b_i)\}$ over $n$-bit inputs requires time $m^{\Omega(\log(m))}$. Our results are shown by a novel application of lifting arguments in proof and communication complexity to hardness of monotone learning, by building on the seminal result of Atserias and M\"uller (J. ACM, 2020) on hardness of automating Resolution proofs.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Negations are powerful even in small depth

We study the power of negation in the Boolean and algebraic settings and show the following results. * We construct a family of polynomials $P_n$ in $n$ variables, all of whose monomials have positive coefficients, such that $P_n$ can be computed by a depth three circuit of polynomial size but any monotone circuit computing it has size $2^{\Omega(n)}$. This is the strongest possible separation result between monotone and non-monotone arithmetic computations and improves upon all earlier results, including the seminal work of Valiant (1980) and more recently by Chattopadhyay, Datta, and Mukhopadhyay (2021). We then boot-strap this result to prove strong monotone separations for polynomials of constant degree, which solves an open problem from the survey of Shpilka and Yehudayoff (2010). * By moving to the Boolean setting, we can prove superpolynomial monotone Boolean circuit lower bounds for specific Boolean functions, which imply that all the powers of certain monotone polynomials cannot be computed by polynomially sized monotone arithmetic circuits. * We then define a collection of problems with linear-algebraic nature, which are similar to span programs, and prove monotone Boolean circuit lower bounds for them. In particular, this gives the strongest known monotone lower bounds for functions in uniform (non-monotone) $\textbf{NC}^2$. Our construction also leads to an explicit matroid that defines a monotone function that is difficult to compute, which solves an open problem by Jukna and Seiwert (2020). Our monotone arithmetic and Boolean circuit lower bounds are based on known techniques, such as reduction from monotone arithmetic complexity to multipartition communication complexity and the approximation method for proving lower bounds for monotone Boolean circuits, but we overcome several new challenges in order to obtain efficient upper bounds using low-depth circuits.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

A Meta-Complexity Characterization of Minimal Quantum Cryptography

We give a meta-complexity characterization of EFI pairs, which are considered the "minimal" primitive in quantum cryptography (and are equivalent to quantum commitments). More precisely, we show that the existence of EFI pairs is equivalent to the following: there exists a non-uniformly samplable distribution over pure states such that the problem of estimating a certain Kolmogorov-like complexity measure is hard given a single copy. A key technical step in our proof, which may be of independent interest, is to show that the existence of EFI pairs is equivalent to the existence of non-uniform single-copy secure pseudorandom state generators (nu 1-PRS). As a corollary, we get an alternative, arguably simpler, construction of a universal EFI pair.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Cryptographic Conditions for Efficient Testing of Distributions and Quantum States

One of the most fundamental problems in distribution testing is the identity testing problem: given samples $x_1,\ldots,x_s$, the goal is to determine whether the samples are drawn from a target distribution $\mathcal{D}$. When $\mathcal{D}$ is a distribution over $\bit^n$, the optimal sample complexity of identity testing is known to be $\Omega(\sqrt{2^n})$. Furthermore, most existing results assume that the samples $x_1,\ldots,x_s$ are generated independently from an unknown distribution. In this work, we overcome both of these limitations by initiating study of distribution testing in a more realistic setting. In our model, the unknown distribution is promised to be efficiently samplable, while allowing the observed samples $x_1,\ldots,x_s$ to be adversarially generated and arbitrarily correlated. Under this model, we show that polynomially many samples suffice to verify distributions. We further characterize the computational complexity of verifying classically- and quantumly-samplable distributions. Our techniques also extend to verifications of quantum states. In establishing some of our results, we employ Kolmogorov complexity techniques in a novel manner. We also present multiple applications of Kolmogorov complexity that are of independent interest. In particular, we show that certified randomness with a classical efficient prover can be achieved without computational assumptions when inefficient verification is allowed. Furthermore, we also show that a natural quantum extension of a well-studied Kolmogorov complexity measure provides a good benchmark for certifying sampling-based quantum advantage.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Monotone Circuit Complexity of Matching

We show that the perfect matching function on $n$-vertex graphs requires monotone circuits of size $\smash{2^{n^{\Omega(1)}}}$. This improves on the $n^{\Omega(\log n)}$ lower bound of Razborov (1985). Our proof uses the standard approximation method together with a new sunflower lemma for matchings.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

On the Computational Hardness of Quantum One-Wayness

There is a large body of work studying what forms of computational hardness are needed to realize classical cryptography. In particular, one-way functions and pseudorandom generators can be built from each other, and thus require equivalent computational assumptions to be realized. Furthermore, the existence of either of these primitives implies that $\rm{P} \neq \rm{NP}$, which gives a lower bound on the necessary hardness. One can also define versions of each of these primitives with quantum output: respectively one-way state generators and pseudorandom state generators. Unlike in the classical setting, it is not known whether either primitive can be built from the other. Although it has been shown that pseudorandom state generators for certain parameter regimes can be used to build one-way state generators, the implication has not been previously known in full generality. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, the existence of one-way state generators has no known implications in complexity theory. We show that pseudorandom states compressing $n$ bits to $\log n + 1$ qubits can be used to build one-way state generators and pseudorandom states compressing $n$ bits to $\omega(\log n)$ qubits are one-way state generators. This is a nearly optimal result since pseudorandom states with fewer than $c \log n$-qubit output can be shown to exist unconditionally. We also show that any one-way state generator can be broken by a quantum algorithm with classical access to a $\rm{PP}$ oracle. An interesting implication of our results is that a $t(n)$-copy one-way state generator exists unconditionally, for every $t(n) = o(n/\log n)$. This contrasts nicely with the previously known fact that $O(n)$-copy one-way state generators require computational hardness. We also outline a new route towards a black-box separation between one-way state generators and quantum bit commitments.

cs.CR↗