arXiv subjects

Bruno Klingler

Publications and source records attributed to Bruno Klingler.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2010

On the cohomology of Kaehler groups

This is the geometric part of two papers on the cohomology of Kaehler groups. Using non-Abelian Hodge theory we show that if a finitely presented group with an unbounded complex linear morphism is the fundamental group of a compact Kaehler manifold then its second or its fourth Betti number does not vanish. Combined with our first paper this shows that a cocompact lattice in a real simple Lie group G of sufficiently large real rank is Kaehler if and only if G is of Hermitian type (a conjecture of Carlson and Toledo).

math.GR↗

arXiv2010

Kaehler groups and duality

This is the topological part of two papers on the cohomology of Kaehler groups. In this paper we show that if a linear duality group of dimension larger than 6 is the fundamental group of a compact Kaehler manifold then its second or its fourth Betti number is non-zero. As a corollary a cocompact p-adic lattice of rank larger than 6 is never Kaehler.

math.GR↗

arXiv2009

Local quaternionic rigidity for complex hyperbolic lattices

Let $Γ\stackrel{i}{\hookrightarrow} L$ be a lattice in the real simple Lie group $L$. If $L$ is of rank at least 2 (respectively locally isomorphic to $Sp(n,1)$) any unbounded morphism $ρ: Γ\longrightarrow G$ into a simple real Lie group $G$ essentially extends to a Lie morphism $ρ_L: L \longrightarrow G$ (Margulis's superrigidity theorem, respectively Corlette's theorem). In particular any such morphism is infinitesimally, thus locally, rigid. On the other hand, for $L=SU(n,1)$, even morphisms of the form $ρ: Γ\stackrel{i}{\hookrightarrow} L \longrightarrow G$ are not infinitesimally rigid in general. Almost nothing is known about their local rigidity. In this paper we prove that any {\em cocompact} lattice $Γ$ in SU(n,1) is essentially locally rigid (while in general not infinitesimally rigid) in the quaternionic groups $Sp(n,1)$, SU(2n,2) or SO(4n,4) (for the natural sequence of embeddings $SU(n,1) \subset Sp(n,1) \subset SU(2n,2) \subset SO(4n,4))$.

math.DG↗