SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Bruno Mendiboure

Publications and source records attributed to Bruno Mendiboure.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Simulation of the carbon dioxide hydrate-water interfacial energy

Carbon dioxide hydrates are ice-like nonstoichiometric inclusion solid compounds with importance to global climate change, and gas transportation and storage. The thermodynamic and kinetic mechanisms that control carbon dioxide nucleation critically depend on hydrate-water interfacial free energy. Interfacial energies show large uncertainties due to the conditions at which experiments are performed. Under these circumstances, we hypothesize that accurate molecular models for water and carbon dioxide combined with computer simulation tools can offer an alternative but complementary way to estimate interfacial energies at coexistence conditions from a molecular perspective. We have evaluated the interfacial free energy of carbon dioxide hydrates at coexistence conditions (three-phase equilibrium or dissociation line) implementing advanced computational methodologies, including the novel Mold Integration methodology. Our calculations are based on the definition of the interfacial free energy, standard statistical thermodynamic techniques, and the use of the most reliable and used molecular models for water (TIP4P/Ice) and carbon dioxide (TraPPE) available in the literature. We find that simulations provide an interfacial energy value, at coexistence conditions, consistent with the experiments from its thermodynamic definition. Our calculations are reliable since are based on the use of two molecular models that accurately predict: (1) The ice-water interfacial free energy; and (2) the dissociation line of carbon dioxide hydrates. Computer simulation predictions provide alternative but reliable estimates of the carbon dioxide interfacial energy. Our pioneering work demonstrates that is possible to predict interfacial energies of hydrates from a truly computational molecular perspective and opens a new door to the determination of free energies of hydrates.

cond-mat.soft

Effect of pressure on the carbon dioxide hydrate-water interfacial free energy along its dissociation line

We investigate the effect of pressure on the carbon dioxide (CO$_{2}$) hydrate-water interfacial free energy along its dissociation line using advanced computer simulation techniques. In previous works, we have determined the interfacial energy of the hydrate at $400 \,\text{bar}$ using the TIP4P/ice and TraPPE molecular models for water and CO$_{2}$, respectively, in combination with two different extensions of the Mold Integration technique [J. Chem. Phys. 141, 134709 (2014)]. Results obtained from computer simulation, $29(2)$ and $30(2)\,\text{mJ/m}^{2}$, are found to be in excellent agreement with the only two measurements that exist in the literature, $28(6)\,\text{mJ/m}^{2}$ determined by Uchida et al. [J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 8202 (2002)] and $30(3)\,\text{mJ/m}^{2}$ by Anderson et al. [J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 3507 (2002)]. Since the experiments do not allow to obtain the variation of the interfacial energy along the dissociation line of the hydrate, we extend our previous studies to quantify the effect of pressure on the interfacial energy at different pressures. Our results suggest that there exists a correlation between the interfacial free energy values and the pressure, i.e., it decreases with the pressure between $100$ and $1000\,\text{bar}$. We expect that the combination of reliable molecular models and advanced simulation techniques could help to improve our knowledge of the thermodynamic parameters that control the interfacial free energy of hydrates from a molecular perspective.

cond-mat.soft

Rotationally invariant local bond order parameters for accurate determination of hydrate structures

Averaged local bond order parameters based on spherical harmonics, also known as Lechner and Dellago order parameters, are routinely used to determine crystal structures in molecular simulations. Among different options, the combination of the $\overline{q}_{4}$ and $\overline{q}_{6}$ parameters is one of the best choices in the literature since allows one to distinguish, not only between solid- and liquid-like particles but also between different crystallographic phases, including cubic and hexagonal phases. Recently, Algaba et al. [J. Colloid Interface Sci. 623, 354, (2022)] have used the Lechner and Dellago order parameters to distinguish hydrate- and liquid-like water molecules in the context of determining the carbon dioxide hydrate-water interfacial free energy. According to the results, the preferred combination previously mentioned is not the best option to differentiate between hydrate- and liquid-like water molecules. In this work, we revisit and extend the use of these parameters to deal with systems in which clathrate hydrates phases coexist with liquid phases of water. We consider carbon dioxide, methane, tetrahydrofuran, nitrogen, and hydrogen hydrates that exhibit sI and sII crystallographic structures. We find that the $\overline{q}_{3}$ and $\overline{q}_{12}$ combination is the best option possible between a large number of possible different pairs to distinguish between hydrate- and liquid-like water molecules in all cases.

cond-mat.soft