Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Byunghan Kim

Publications and source records attributed to Byunghan Kim.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2024

Automorphism groups over a hyperimaginary

In this paper we study the Lascar group over a hyperimaginary e. We verify that various results about the group over a real set still hold when the set is replaced by e. First of all, there is no written proof in the available literature that the group over e is a topological group. We present an expository style proof of the fact, which even simplifies existing proofs for the real case. We further extend a result that the orbit equivalence relation under a closed subgroup of the Lascar group is type-definable. On the one hand, we correct errors appeared in the book, "Simplicity Theory" [6, 5.1.14-15] and produce a counterexample. On the other, we extend Newelski's Theorem in "The diameter of a Lascar strong type" [12] that `a G-compact theory over a set has a uniform bound for the Lascar distances' to the hyperimaginary context. Lastly, we supply a partial positive answer to a question raised in "The relativized Lascar groups, type-amalgamations, and algebraicity" [4, 2.11], which is even a new result in the real context.

math.LO↗
arXiv2023

Transitivity, lowness, and ranks in NSOP$_1$ theories

We develop the theory of Kim-independence in the context of NSOP$_{1}$ theories satsifying the existence axiom. We show that, in such theories, Kim-independence is transitive and that $\ind^{K}$-Morley sequences witness Kim-dividing. As applications, we show that, under the assumption of existence, in a low NSOP$_{1}$ theory, Shelah strong types and Lascar strong types coincide and, additionally, we introduce a notion of rank for NSOP$_{1}$ theories.

math.LO↗
arXiv2019

Independence over arbitrary sets in NSOP$_1$ theories

We study Kim-independence over arbitrary sets. Assuming that forking satisfies existence, we establish Kim's lemma for Kim-dividing over arbitrary sets in an NSOP$_{1}$ theory. We deduce symmetry of Kim-independence and the independence theorem for Lascar strong types.

math.LO↗
arXiv2019

More on tree properties

Tree properties are introduced by Shelah, and it is well-known that a theory has TP (the tree property) if and only if it has TP$_1$ or TP$_2$. In any simple theory (i.e., a theory not having TP), forking supplies a good independence notion as it satisfies symmetry, transitivity, extension, local character, and type-amalgamation. Shelah also introduced SOP$_n$ ($n$-strong order property). Recently it is proved that in any NSOP$_1$ theory (i.e. a theory not having SOP$_1$) holding nonforking existence, Kim-forking also satisfies all the mentioned independence properties except base monotonicity (one direction of transitivity). These results are the sources of motivation for this paper. Mainly, we produce type-counting criteria for SOP$_2$ (which is equivalent to TP$_1$) and SOP$_1$. In addition, we study relationships between TP$_2$ and Kim-forking, and obtain that a theory is supersimple iff there is no countably infinite Kim-forking chain.

math.LO↗
arXiv2017

The Lascar groups and the 1st homology groups in model theory

Let $p$ be a strong type of an algebraically closed tuple over $B=\acl^{\eq}(B)$ in any theory $T$. Depending on a ternary relation $\indo^*$ satisfying some basic axioms (there is at least one such, namely the trivial independence in $T$), the first homology group $H^*_1(p)$ can be introduced, similarly to \cite{GKK1}. We show that there is a canonical surjective homomorphism from the Lascar group over $B$ to $H^*_1(p)$. We also notice that the map factors naturally via a surjection from the `relativised' Lascar group of the type (which we define in analogy with the Lascar group of the theory) onto the homology group, and we give an explicit description of its kernel. Due to this characterization, it follows that the first homology group of $p$ is independent from the choice of $\indo^*$, and can be written simply as $H_1(p)$. As consequences, in any $T$, we show that $|H_1(p)|\geq 2^{\aleph_0}$ unless $H_1(p)$ is trivial, and we give a criterion for the equality of stp and Lstp of algebraically closed tuples using the notions of the first homology group and a relativised Lascar group. We also argue how any abelian connected compact group can appear as the first homology group of the type of a model.

math.LO↗
arXiv2016

Homology groups of types in stable theories and the Hurewicz correspondence

We give an explicit description of the homomorphism group H_n(p) of a strong type p in any stable theory under the assumption that for every non-forking extension q of p the groups H_i(q) are trivial for i at least 2 but less than n. The group H_n(p) turns out to be isomorphic to the automorphism group of a certain piece of the algebraic closure of n independent realizations of p; it was shown earlier by the authors that such a group must be abelian. We call this the "Hurewicz correspondence" in analogy with the Hurewicz Theorem in algebraic topology.

math.LO↗
arXiv2015

Non-commutative groupoids obtained from the failure of $3$-uniqueness in stable theories

We construct a possibly non-commutative groupoid from the failure of $3$-uniqueness of a strong type. The commutative groupoid constructed by John Goodrick and Alexei Kolesnikov in \cite{GK} lives in the center of the groupoid. A certain automorphism group approximated by the vertex groups of the non-commutative groupoids is suggested as a "fundamental group" of the strong type.

math.LO↗
arXiv2015

A classification of 2-chains having 1-shell boundaries in rosy theories

We classify, in a non-trivial amenable collection of functors, all 2-chains up to the relation of having the same 1-shell boundary. In particular, we prove that in a rosy theory, every 1-shell of a Lascar strong type is the boundary of some 2-chain, hence making the 1st homology group trivial. We also show that, unlike in simple theories, in rosy theories there is no upper bound on the minimal lengths of $2$-chains whose boundary is a $1$-shell.

math.LO↗
arXiv2014

Type-amalgamation properties and polygroupoids in stable theories

We show that in a stable first-order theory, the failure of higher-dimensional type amalgamation can always be witnessed by algebraic structures which we call n-ary polygroupoids. This generalizes a result of Hrushovski that failures of 4-amalgamation in stable theories are witnessed by definable groupoids (which are 2-ary polygroupoids in our terminology). The n-ary polygroupoids are definable in a mild expansion of the language (adding a unary predicate for an infinite Morley sequence).

math.LO↗
arXiv2013

Tree indiscernibilities, revisited

We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set $\{a_η\mid η\in \W\}$ that saw original use in \cite{sh90}, which we name \textit{$\s$-} and \textit{$\n$-indiscernibility}. Using these definitions and detailed proofs, we prove $\s$- and $\n$-modeling theorems and give applications of these theorems. In particular, we verify a step in the argument that TP is equivalent to TP$_1$ or TP$_2$ that has not seen explication in the literature. In the Appendix, we exposit the proofs of \citep[{App. 2.6, 2.7}]{sh90}, expanding on the details.

math.LO↗
arXiv2011

Amalgamation functors and homology groups in model theory

We present definitions of homology groups associated to a family of amalgamation functors. We show that if the generalized amalgamation properties hold, then the homology groups are trivial. We compute the group H_2 for strong types in stable theories and show that in this context, the class of possible groups H_2 is precisely the profinite abelian groups.

math.LO↗
arXiv2010

Amalgamation functors and boundary properties in simple theories

This paper continues the study of generalized amalgamation properties. Part of the paper provides a finer analysis of the groupoids that arise from failure of 3-uniqueness in a stable theory. We show that such groupoids must be abelian and link the binding group of the groupoids to a certain automorphism group of the monster model, showing that the group must be abelian as well. We also study connections between n-existence and n-uniqueness properties for various "dimensions" n in the wider context of simple theories. We introduce a family of weaker existence and uniqueness properties. Many of these properties did appear in the literature before; we give a category-theoretic formulation and study them systematically. Finally, we give examples of first-order simple unstable theories showing, in particular, that there is no straightforward generalization of the groupoid construction in an unstable context.

math.LO↗