arXiv subjects

C. A. P. Bengaly

Publications and source records attributed to C. A. P. Bengaly.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2018

Measuring the scale of cosmic homogeneity with SDSS-IV DR14 quasars

The quasar sample of the fourteenth data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-IV DR14) is used to determine the cosmic homogeneity scale in the redshift range $0.80<z<2.24$. We divide the sample into 4 redshift bins, each one with $N_{\rm q} \geq 19,000$ quasars, spanning the whole redshift coverage of the survey and use two correlation function estimators to measure the scaled counts-in-spheres and its logarithmic derivative, i.e., the fractal correlation dimension, $D_2$. Using the $Λ$CDM cosmology as the fiducial model, we first estimate the redshift evolution of quasar bias and then the homogeneity scale of the underlying matter distribution $r_{\rm{hom}}^{\rm{m}}$. We find that $r_{\rm{hom}}^{\rm{m}}$ exhibits a decreasing trend with redshift and that the values obtained are in good agreement with the $Λ$CDM prediction over the entire redshift interval studied. We, therefore, conclude that the large-scale homogeneity assumption is consistent with the largest spatial distribution of quasars currently available

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2018

Isotropy of low redshift type Ia Supernovae: A Bayesian analysis

The standard cosmology strongly relies upon the Cosmological Principle, which consists on the hypotheses of large scale isotropy and homogeneity of the Universe. Testing these assumptions is, therefore, crucial to determining if there are deviations from the standard cosmological paradigm. In this paper, we use the latest type Ia supernova compilations, namely JLA and Union2.1 to test the cosmological isotropy at low redshift ranges ($z<0.1$). This is performed through a Bayesian selection analysis, in which we compare the standard, isotropic model, with another one including a dipole correction due to peculiar velocities. We find that the Union2.1 sample favors the dipole-corrected model, but the opposite happens for the JLA. Nonetheless, the velocity dipole results are in good agreement with previous analyses carried out with both datasets. We conclude that there are no significant indications for large anisotropic signals from nearby supernova compilations, albeit this test should be greatly improved with the upcoming cosmological surveys.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2018

Probing the Cosmological Principle in the counts of radio galaxies at different frequencies

According to the Cosmological Principle, the matter distribution on very large scales should have a kinematic dipole that is aligned with that of the CMB. We determine the dipole anisotropy in the number counts of two all-sky surveys of radio galaxies. For the first time, this analysis is presented for the TGSS survey, allowing us to check consistency of the radio dipole at low and high frequencies by comparing the results with the well-known NVSS survey. We match the flux thresholds of the catalogues, with flux limits chosen to minimise systematics, and adopt a strict masking scheme. We find dipole directions that are in good agreement with each other and with the CMB dipole. In order to compare the amplitude of the dipoles with theoretical predictions, we produce sets of lognormal realisations. Our realisations include the theoretical kinematic dipole, galaxy clustering, Poisson noise, simulated redshift distributions which fit the NVSS and TGSS source counts, and errors in flux calibration. The measured dipole for NVSS is $\sim\!2$ times larger than predicted by the mock data. For TGSS, the dipole is almost $\sim\! 5$ times larger than predicted, even after checking for completeness and taking account of errors in source fluxes and in flux calibration. Further work is required to understand the nature of the systematics that are the likely cause of the anomalously large TGSS dipole amplitude.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2018

The dipole anisotropy of WISE x SuperCOSMOS number counts

We probe the isotropy of the Universe with the largest all-sky photometric redshift dataset currently available, namely WISE~$\times$~SuperCOSMOS. We search for dipole anisotropy of galaxy number counts in multiple redshift shells within the $0.10 < z < 0.35$ range, for two subsamples drawn from the same parent catalogue. Our results show that the dipole directions are in good agreement with most of the previous analyses in the literature, and in most redshift bins the dipole amplitudes are well consistent with $Λ$CDM-based mocks in the cleanest sample of this catalogue. In the $z<0.15$ range, however, we obtain a persistently large anisotropy in both subsamples of our dataset. Overall, we report no significant evidence against the isotropy assumption in this catalogue except for the lowest redshift ranges. The origin of the latter discrepancy is unclear, and improved data may be needed to explain it.

astro-ph.CO↗