Caiwan Sun | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

CRS-Bench: A Reference-Relative Reliability Benchmark for Medical Image Encoders

Pretrained image encoders are central to medical image classification, where expert annotation is costly and task-specific cohorts are often limited. As the model space expands from general-purpose to broad-medical and specialty-specific encoders, selecting the representation becomes a substantive modeling decision. Clean-test discrimination alone is insufficient for this purpose: encoders with similar AUROC can differ in calibration, label efficiency, and stability under acquisition perturbations or distribution shift. We introduce CRS-Bench, a controlled benchmark for multi-objective medical encoder selection. CRS-Bench evaluates 15 pretrained encoder families across dermatology, ophthalmology, and radiology using ISIC 2019, APTOS 2019, and CheXpert, with CheXpert-to-MIMIC-CXR as an observed institutional shift, yielding 17,575 controlled run records and 3,515 seed-aggregated metric rows. Each encoder is characterized along four operational reliability dimensions: discrimination, calibration, label efficiency, and robustness. We summarize these dimensions using the Clinical Reliability Score (CRS), a Pareto-aware, reference-relative score combining dominance, profile balance, and worst-axis performance. AUROC and CRS are positively associated but not decision-equivalent: 21 of 105 pairwise orderings reverse, with a mean absolute rank displacement of 1.87. Paired-seed bootstrap analysis identifies PanDerm, MedSigLIP, and MedGemma as a stable leading reliability tier rather than a statistically resolved single leader. CRS-Bench provides a controlled framework for selecting medical image encoders from multi-axis reliability profiles rather than clean-test AUROC alone.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2026

Search Broadly, Seek Evidence on Both Sides, Decide Narrowly: Evidence-Admissible GraphRAG for Longitudinal Clinical Event Verification

Longitudinal clinical event-relation verification determines whether a patient record supports a specified relation among two or more clinical events. This task is challenging because evidence is distributed across structured records, notes, laboratory trajectories, encounters, and time, while negation, temporal mismatch, repeated documentation, and conflicting findings can make retrieved information appear relevant without establishing the relation. We present MedEventGraph-RAG, an evidence-admissible framework that represents event occurrences in a patient-specific graph and links each occurrence to source evidence, including structured rows, note spans, timestamps, and numerical trajectories. Given a verification query specifying events, relation, and clinical scope, the graph guides discovery of candidate event chains and retrieves evidence from both supporting and contradicting sides. A query-specific evidence contract filters information by patient identity, scope, occurrence binding, and source traceability before a separate assessor determines supported, conflicting, refuted, or insufficient outcomes. Across ten protocols on i2b2, n2c2, MIMIC-IV, and LUNGUAGE, MedEventGraph-RAG achieves balanced accuracies of 78.6, 67.3, and 96.8 on temporal, medication-adverse-event, and recorded-order verification, improving over the strongest matched baselines by 26.9, 4.9, and 30.4 points. Under evidence masking, it reaches 92.2 balanced accuracy with no false-support predictions. When intermediate events are hidden, it recovers complete source-traceable event chains in 57.9% of i2b2 and 70.0% of LUNGUAGE cases. These results show that separating broad evidence discovery from narrow evidence-admissible assessment improves longitudinal clinical verification and reduces unsupported conclusions.

cs.AI↗