Kempe equivalence of $4$-critical planar graphs
Answering a question of Mohar from 2007, we show that for every $4$-critical planar graph, its set of $4$-colorings is a Kempe class.
math.CO↗
arXiv subjects
Carl Feghali
Publications and source records attributed to Carl Feghali.
A note on Matching-Cut in $P_t$-free Graphs
A matching-cut of a graph is an edge cut that is a matching. The problem Matching-Cut is that of recognizing graphs with a matching-cut and is NP-complete, even if the graph belongs to one of a number of classes. We initiate the study of Matching-Cut for graphs without a fixed path as an induced subgraph. We show that Matching-Cut is in P for $P_5$-free graphs, but that there exists an integer $t > 0$ for which it is NP-complete for $P_{t}$-free graphs.
math.CO↗
1-Extendability of independent sets
In the 70s, Berge introduced 1-extendable graphs (also called B-graphs), which are graphs where every vertex belongs to a maximum independent set. Motivated by an application in the design of wireless networks, we study the computational complexity of 1-extendability, the problem of deciding whether a graph is 1-extendable. We show that, in general, 1-extendability cannot be solved in $2^{o(n)}$ time assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the input graph, and that it remains NP-hard in subcubic planar graphs and in unit disk graphs (which is a natural model for wireless networks). Although 1-extendability seems to be very close to the problem of finding an independent set of maximum size (a.k.a. Maximum Independent Set), we show that, interestingly, there exist 1-extendable graphs for which Maximum Independent Set is NP-hard. Finally, we investigate a parameterized version of 1-extendability.
cs.CC↗
Strengthening a theorem of Meyniel
For an integer $k \geq 1$ and a graph $G$, let $\mathcal{K}_k(G)$ be the graph that has vertex set all proper $k$-colorings of $G$, and an edge between two vertices $α$ and~$β$ whenever the coloring~$β$ can be obtained from $α$ by a single Kempe change. A theorem of Meyniel from 1978 states that $\mathcal{K}_5(G)$ is connected with diameter $O(5^{|V(G)|})$ for every planar graph $G$. We significantly strengthen this result, by showing that there is a positive constant $c$ such that $\mathcal{K}_5(G)$ has diameter $O(|V(G)|^c)$ for every planar graph $G$.
math.CO↗
Recolouring planar graphs of girth at least five
For a positive integer $k$, the $k$-recolouring graph of a graph $G$ has as vertex set all proper $k$-colourings of $G$ with two $k$-colourings being adjacent if they differ by the colour of exactly one vertex. A result of Dyer et al. regarding graphs of bounded degeneracy implies that the $7$-recolouring graphs of planar graphs, the $5$-recolouring graphs of triangle-free planar graphs and the $4$-recolouring graphs planar graphs of girth at least six are connected. On the other hand, there are planar graphs whose $6$-recolouring graph is disconnected, triangle-free planar graphs whose $4$-recolouring graph is disconnected and planar graphs of any given girth whose $3$-recolouring graph is disconnected. The main result of this paper consists in showing, via a novel application of the discharging method, that the $4$-recolouring graph of every planar graph of girth five is connected. This completes the classification of the connectedness of the recolouring graph for planar graphs of given girth. We also prove some theorems regarding the diameter of the recolouring graph of planar graphs.
math.CO↗
Mixing colourings in $2K_2$-free graphs
The reconfiguration graph for the $k$-colourings of a graph $G$, denoted $R_{k}(G)$, is the graph whose vertices are the $k$-colourings of $G$ and two colourings are joined by an edge if they differ in colour on exactly one vertex. For any $k$-colourable $P_4$-free graph $G$, Bonamy and Bousquet proved that $R_{k+1}(G)$ is connected. In this short note, we complete the classification of the connectedness of $R_{k+1}(G)$ for a $k$-colourable graph $G$ excluding a fixed path, by constructing a $7$-chromatic $2K_2$-free (and hence $P_5$-free) graph admitting a frozen $8$-colouring. This settles a question of the second author.
math.CO↗
The maximum sum of sizes of cross-intersecting families of subsets of a set
A set of sets is called a family. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of sets are said to be cross-intersecting if each member of $\mathcal{A}$ intersects each member of $\mathcal{B}$. For any two integers $n$ and $k$ with $1 \leq k \leq n$, let ${[n] \choose \leq k}$ denote the family of subsets of $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$ that have at most $k$ elements. We show that if $\mathcal{A}$ is a non-empty subfamily of ${[n] \choose \leq r}$, $\mathcal{B}$ is a non-empty subfamily of ${[n] \choose \leq s}$, $r \leq s$, and $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are cross-intersecting, then \[|\mathcal{A}| + |\mathcal{B}| \leq 1 + \sum_{i=1}^s \left({n \choose i} - {n-r \choose i} \right),\] and equality holds if $\mathcal{A} = \{[r]\}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ is the family of sets in ${[n] \choose \leq s}$ that intersect $[r]$.
math.CO↗
Paths between colourings of sparse graphs
The reconfiguration graph $R_k(G)$ of the $k$-colourings of a graph~$G$ has as vertex set the set of all possible $k$-colourings of $G$ and two colourings are adjacent if they differ on exactly one vertex. We give a short proof of the following theorem of Bousquet and Perarnau (\emph{European Journal of Combinatorics}, 2016). Let $d$ and $k$ be positive integers, $k \geq d + 1$. For every $ε> 0$ and every graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and maximum average degree $d - ε$, there exists a constant $c = c(d, ε)$ such that $R_k(G)$ has diameter $O(n^c)$. Our proof can be transformed into a simple polynomial time algorithm that finds a path between a given pair of colourings in $R_k(G)$.
math.CO↗
A simple proof of Talbot's theorem for intersecting separated sets
A subset $A$ of $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$ is $k$-separated if, when the elements of $[n]$ are considered on a circle, between any two elements of $A$ there are at least $k$ elements of $[n]$ that are not in $A$. A family $\mathcal{A}$ of sets is intersecting if every two sets in $\mathcal{A}$ intersect. We give a short and simple proof of a remarkable result of Talbot (2003), stating that if $n \geq (k + 1)r$ and $\mathcal{A}$ is an intersecting family of $k$-separated $r$-element subsets of $[n]$, then $|\mathcal{A}| \leq \binom{n - kr - 1}{r - 1}$. This bound is best possible.
math.CO↗
Reconfiguring colorings of graphs with bounded maximum average degree
The reconfiguration graph $R_k(G)$ for the $k$-colorings of a graph $G$ has as vertex set the set of all possible $k$-colorings of $G$ and two colorings are adjacent if they differ in the color of exactly one vertex of $G$. Let $d, k \geq 1$ be integers such that $k \geq d+1$. We prove that for every $ε> 0$ and every graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and maximum average degree $d - ε$, $R_k(G)$ has diameter $O(n(\log n)^{d - 1})$. This significantly strengthens several existing results.
math.CO↗
An Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem for unions of length 2 paths
A family of sets is intersecting if any two sets in the family intersect. Given a graph $G$ and an integer $r\geq 1$, let $\mathcal{I}^{(r)}(G)$ denote the family of independent sets of size $r$ of $G$. For a vertex $v$ of $G$, the family of independent sets of size $r$ that contain $v$ is called an $r$-star. Then $G$ is said to be $r$-EKR if no intersecting subfamily of $ \mathcal{I}^{(r)}(G)$ is bigger than the largest $r$-star. Let $n$ be a positive integer, and let $G$ consist of the disjoint union of $n$ paths each of length 2. We prove that if $1 \leq r \leq n/2$, then $G$ is $r$-EKR. This affirms a longstanding conjecture of Holroyd and Talbot for this class of graphs and can be seen as an analogue of a well-known theorem on signed sets, proved using different methods, by Deza and Frankl and by Bollobás and Leader. Our main approach is a novel probabilistic extension of Katona's elegant cycle method, which might be of independent interest.
math.CO↗
A Thomassen-type method for planar graph recoloring
The reconfiguration graph $R_k(G)$ for the $k$-colorings of a graph $G$ has as vertices all possible $k$-colorings of $G$ and two colorings are adjacent if they differ in the color of exactly one vertex. We use a list coloring technique inspired by results of Thomassen to prove that for a planar graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, $R_{10}(G)$ has diameter at most $8n$, and if $G$ is triangle-free, then $R_7(G)$ has diameter at most $7n$.
math.CO↗
An update on reconfiguring $10$-colorings of planar graphs
The reconfiguration graph $R_k(G)$ for the $k$-colorings of a graph $G$ has as vertex set the set of all possible proper $k$-colorings of $G$ and two colorings are adjacent if they differ in the color of exactly one vertex. A result of Bousquet and Perarnau (2016) regarding graphs of bounded degeneracy implies that if $G$ is a planar graph with $n$ vertices, then $R_{12}(G)$ has diameter at most $6n$. We improve on the number of colors, showing that $R_{10}(G)$ has diameter at most $8n$ for every planar graph $G$ with $n$ vertices.
math.CO↗
Intersecting families, signed sets, and injection
Let $k, r, n \geq 1$ be integers, and let $§_{n, k, r}$ be the family of $r$-signed $k$-sets on $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$ given by $$ \mathcal{S}_{n, k, r} = \Big\{\{(x_1, a_1), \dots, (x_k, a_k)\}: \{x_1, \dots, x_k\} \in \binom{[n]}{k}, a_1, \dots, a_k \in [r] \Big\}. $$ A family $\mathcal{A} \subseteq §_{n, k, r}$ is \emph{intersecting} if $A, B \in \mathcal{A}$ implies $A \cap B \not= \emptyset$. A well-known result (first stated by Meyer and proved using different methods by Deza and Frankl, and Bollobás and Leader) states that if $\mathcal{A} \subseteq \mathcal{S}_{n, k, r}$ is intersecting, $r \geq 2$ and $1 \leq k \leq n$, then $$|\mathcal{A}| \leq r^{k-1}\binom{n-1}{k - 1}.$$ We provide a proof of this result by injection (in the same spirit as Frankl and Füredi's and Hurlbert and Kamat's injective proofs of the Erdős--Ko--Rado Theorem, and Frankl's and Hurlbert and Kamat's injective proofs of the Hilton--Milner Theorem) whenever $r \geq 2$ and $1 \leq k \leq n/2$, leaving open only some cases when $k \leq n$.
math.CO↗
On the Hilton-Spencer intersection theorems for unions of cycles
A family $\mathcal{A}$ of sets is said to be intersecting if every two sets in $\mathcal{A}$ intersect. An intersecting family is said to be \emph{trivial} it its sets have a common element. A graph $G$ is said to be $r$-EKR if at least one of the largest intersecting families of independent $r$-element sets of $G$ is trivial. Let $α(G)$ and $ω(G)$ denote the independence number and the clique number of $G$, respectively. Hilton and Spencer recently showed that if $G$ is the vertex-disjoint union of a cycle ${_*C}$ raised to the power $k^*$ and $s$ cycles ${_1C}, \dots, {_sC}$ raised to the powers $k_1, \dots, k_s$, respectively, $1 \leq r \leq α(G)$, and $$\min\big(ω(_1C^{k_1}), \dots, ω(_sC^{k_s})\big) \geq 2k^* + 1,$$ then $G$ is $r$-EKR. They had shown that the same holds if ${_*C}$ is replaced by a path and the condition on the clique numbers is relaxed to $$\min\big(ω(_1C^{k_1}), \dots, ω(_sC^{k_s})\big) \geq k^* + 1.$$ We use the classical Shadow Intersection Theorem of Katona to obtain a short proof of each result for the case where the inequality for the minimum clique number is strict.
math.CO↗
Partitioning a graph into degenerate subgraphs
Let $G = (V, E)$ be a connected graph with maximum degree $k\geq 3$ distinct from $K_{k+1}$. Given integers $s \geq 2$ and $p_1,\ldots,p_s\geq 0$, $G$ is said to be $(p_1, \dots, p_s)$-partitionable if there exists a partition of $V$ into sets~$V_1,\ldots,V_s$ such that $G[V_i]$ is $p_i$-degenerate for $i\in\{1,\ldots,s\}$. In this paper, we prove that we can find a $(p_1, \dots, p_s)$-partition of $G$ in $O(|V| + |E|)$-time whenever $1\geq p_1, \dots, p_s \geq 0$ and $p_1 + \dots + p_s \geq k - s$. This generalizes a result of Bonamy et al. (MFCS, 2017) and can be viewed as an algorithmic extension of Brooks' theorem and several results on vertex arboricity of graphs of bounded maximum degree. We also prove that deciding whether $G$ is $(p, q)$-partitionable is $\mathbb{NP}$-complete for every $k \geq 5$ and pairs of non-negative integers $(p, q)$ such that $(p, q) \not = (1, 1)$ and $p + q = k - 3$. This resolves an open problem of Bonamy et al. (manuscript, 2017). Combined with results of Borodin, Kostochka and Toft (\emph{Discrete Mathematics}, 2000), Yang and Yuan (\emph{Discrete Mathematics}, 2006) and Wu, Yuan and Zhao (\emph{Journal of Mathematical Study}, 1996), it also settles the complexity of deciding whether a graph with bounded maximum degree can be partitioned into two subgraphs of prescribed degeneracy.
cs.DM↗
On Cycle Transversals and Their Connected Variants in the Absence of a Small Linear Forest
A graph is $H$-free if it contains no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$. We prove new complexity results for the two classical cycle transversal problems Feedback Vertex Set and Odd Cycle Transversal by showing that they can be solved in polynomial time on $(sP_1+P_3)$-free graphs for every integer $s\geq 1$. We show the same result for the variants Connected Feedback Vertex Set and Connected Odd Cycle Transversal. We also prove that the latter two problems are polynomial-time solvable on cographs; this was already known for Feedback Vertex Set and Odd Cycle Transversal. We complement these results by proving that Odd Cycle Transversal and Connected Odd Cycle Transversal are NP-complete on $(P_2+P_5,P_6)$-free graphs.
cs.DS↗
The Erdős-Ko-Rado property of trees of depth two
A family of sets is intersecting if any two sets in the family intersect. Given a graph $G$ and an integer $r\geq 1$, let $\mathcal{I}^{(r)}(G)$ denote the family of independent sets of size $r$ of $G$. For a vertex $v$ of $G$, let $\mathcal{I}^{(r)}_v(G)$ denote the family of independent sets of size $r$ that contain $v$. This family is called an $r$-star. Then $G$ is said to be $r$-EKR if no intersecting subfamily of $ \mathcal{I}^{(r)}(G)$ is bigger than the largest $r$-star. Let $k, n, r \geq 1$, and let $T(n, k)$ be the tree of depth two in which the root has degree $n$ and every neighbour of the root has the same number $k + 1$ of neighbours. For each $k \geq 2$, we show that $T(n, k)$ is $r$-EKR if $2r \leq n$, extending results of Borg and of Feghali, Johnson and Thomas who considered the case $k = 1$.
math.CO↗