arXiv subjects

Carlos A. Martínez

Publications and source records attributed to Carlos A. Martínez.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Bayesian Selection of Edge Spectral Modes for Crash Counts on Urban Road Networks with Applications in Barcelona and Bogotá

Crash counts on urban road networks exhibit spatial dependence driven by road connectivity rather than Euclidean proximity alone. We propose a Bayesian negative binomial model that represents spatial variation through a parsimonious combination of spectral components defined directly on road segments. The model combines the normalized random edge neighborhood Gaussian (RENeGe) operator with a continuous spike-and-slab prior, with mixture indicators marginalized out. Eigenvalue-dependent slab variances link spectral regularization to network-supported smoothness, while posterior slab-membership probabilities quantify support for individual components and uncertainty in effective spectral complexity. Segment length is used as an exposure offset, so fitted rates describe crash frequency per unit road length rather than traffic-adjusted risk. In a simulation study with 1,200 datasets and 4,800 Bayesian fits, the proposed model achieved the lowest mean spatial-field recovery error and highest mean test log predictive density under sparse RENeGe truth. Under alternative generating mechanisms, its predictive performance remained close to dense spectral models and exceeded that of a nonspatial model. Applications to Barcelona and central Bogota showed distinct posterior spectral patterns. Exploratory leave-one-segment-out comparisons found similar predictive accuracy for the proposed model and a low-rank edge CAR model, both outperforming a nonspatial negative binomial model, while a spectral BYM2 model achieved the highest exploratory predictive score. These results support probabilistic summaries of spectral complexity without a detectable predictive penalty relative to the corresponding CAR model.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

The Bayesian Way: Uncertainty, Learning, and Statistical Reasoning

This paper offers a comprehensive introduction to Bayesian inference, combining historical context, theoretical foundations, and core analytical examples. Beginning with Bayes' theorem and the philosophical distinctions between Bayesian and frequentist approaches, we develop the inferential framework for estimation, interval construction, hypothesis testing, and prediction. Through canonical models, we illustrate how prior information and observed data are formally integrated to yield posterior distributions. We also explore key concepts including loss functions, credible intervals, Bayes factors, identifiability, and asymptotic behavior. While emphasizing analytical tractability in classical settings, we outline modern extensions that rely on simulation-based methods and discuss challenges related to prior specification and model evaluation. Though focused on foundational ideas, this paper sets the stage for applying Bayesian methods in contemporary domains such as hierarchical modeling, nonparametrics, and structured applications in time series, spatial data, networks, and political science. The goal is to provide a rigorous yet accessible entry point for students and researchers seeking to adopt a Bayesian perspective in statistical practice.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Advances in Bayesian Modeling: Applications and Methods

This paper explores the versatility and depth of Bayesian modeling by presenting a comprehensive range of applications and methods, combining Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques and variational approximations. Covering topics such as hierarchical modeling, spatial modeling, higher-order Markov chains, and Bayesian nonparametrics, the study emphasizes practical implementations across diverse fields, including oceanography, climatology, epidemiology, astronomy, and financial analysis. The aim is to bridge theoretical underpinnings with real-world applications, illustrating the formulation of Bayesian models, elicitation of priors, computational strategies, and posterior and predictive analyses. By leveraging different computational methods, this paper provides insights into model fitting, goodness-of-fit evaluation, and predictive accuracy, addressing computational efficiency and methodological challenges across various datasets and domains.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2017

Inferring the Partial Correlation Structure of Allelic Effects and Incorporating it in Genome-wide Prediction

In this study, we addressed the problem of genome-wide prediction accounting for partial correlation of marker effects when the partial correlation structure, or equivalently, the pattern of zeros of the precision matrix is unknown. This problem requires estimating the partial correlation structure of marker effects, that is, learning the pattern of zeros of the corresponding precision matrix, estimating its non-null entries, and incorporating the inferred concentration matrix in the prediction of marker allelic effects. To this end, we developed a set of statistical methods based on Gaussian concentration graph models (GCGM) and Gaussian directed acyclic graph models (GDAGM) that adapt the existing theory to perform covariance model selection (GCGM) or DAG selection (GDAGM) to genome-wide prediction. Bayesian and frequentist approaches were formulated. Our frequentist formulations combined some existing methods with the EM algorithm and were termed Glasso-EM, CONCORD-EM and CSCS-EM, whereas our Bayesian formulations corresponded to hierarchical models termed Bayes G-Sel and Bayes DAG-Sel. Results from a simulation study showed that our methods can accurately recover the partial correlation structure and estimate the precision matrix. Methods CONCORD-EM and Bayes G-Sel had an outstanding performance in estimating the partial correlation structure and a method based on CONCORD-EM yielded the most accurate estimates of the precision matrix. Our methods can be used as predictive machines and as tools to learn about the covariation of effects of pairs of loci on a given phenotype conditioned on the effects of all the other loci considered in the model. Therefore, they are useful tools to learn about the underlying biology of a given trait because they help to understand relationships between different regions of the genome in terms of the partial correlations of their effects on that trait.

q-bio.QM↗