arXiv subjects

Carola Doerr

Publications and source records attributed to Carola Doerr.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2025

Illuminating the Diversity-Fitness Trade-Off in Black-Box Optimization

In real-world applications, users often favor structurally diverse design choices over one high-quality solution. It is hence important to consider more solutions that decision makers can compare and further explore based on additional criteria. Alongside the existing approaches of evolutionary diversity optimization, quality diversity, and multimodal optimization, this paper presents a fresh perspective on this challenge by considering the problem of identifying a fixed number of solutions with a pairwise distance above a specified threshold while maximizing their average quality. We obtain first insight into these objectives by performing a subset selection on the search trajectories of different well-established search heuristics, whether they have been specifically designed with diversity in mind or not. We emphasize that the main goal of our work is not to present a new algorithm but to understand the capability of off-the-shelf algorithms to quantify the trade-off between the minimum pairwise distance within batches of solutions and their average quality. We also analyze how this trade-off depends on the properties of the underlying optimization problem. A possibly surprising outcome of our empirical study is the observation that naive uniform random sampling establishes a very strong baseline for our problem, hardly ever outperformed by the search trajectories of the considered heuristics. We interpret these results as a motivation to develop algorithms tailored to produce diverse solutions of high average quality.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

On the Importance of Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning-based Dynamic Algorithm Configuration: A Case Study on OneMax with (1+($λ$,$λ$))-GA

Dynamic Algorithm Configuration (DAC) has garnered significant attention in recent years, particularly in the prevalence of machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Numerous studies have leveraged the robustness of decision-making in Reinforcement Learning (RL) to address the optimization challenges associated with algorithm configuration. However, making an RL agent work properly is a non-trivial task, especially in reward design, which necessitates a substantial amount of handcrafted knowledge based on domain expertise. In this work, we study the importance of reward design in the context of DAC via a case study on controlling the population size of the $(1+(λ,λ))$-GA optimizing OneMax. We observed that a poorly designed reward can hinder the RL agent's ability to learn an optimal policy because of a lack of exploration, leading to both scalability and learning divergence issues. To address those challenges, we propose the application of a reward shaping mechanism to facilitate enhanced exploration of the environment by the RL agent. Our work not only demonstrates the ability of RL in dynamically configuring the $(1+(λ,λ))$-GA, but also confirms the advantages of reward shaping in the scalability of RL agents across various sizes of OneMax problems.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

MO-IOHinspector: Anytime Benchmarking of Multi-Objective Algorithms using IOHprofiler

Benchmarking is one of the key ways in which we can gain insight into the strengths and weaknesses of optimization algorithms. In sampling-based optimization, considering the anytime behavior of an algorithm can provide valuable insights for further developments. In the context of multi-objective optimization, this anytime perspective is not as widely adopted as in the single-objective context. In this paper, we propose a new software tool which uses principles from unbounded archiving as a logging structure. This leads to a clearer separation between experimental design and subsequent analysis decisions. We integrate this approach as a new Python module into the IOHprofiler framework and demonstrate the benefits of this approach by showcasing the ability to change indicators, aggregations, and ranking procedures during the analysis pipeline.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2024

Tight Runtime Bounds for Static Unary Unbiased Evolutionary Algorithms on Linear Functions

In a seminal paper in 2013, Witt showed that the (1+1) Evolutionary Algorithm with standard bit mutation needs time $(1+o(1))n \ln n/p_1$ to find the optimum of any linear function, as long as the probability $p_1$ to flip exactly one bit is $Θ(1)$. In this paper we investigate how this result generalizes if standard bit mutation is replaced by an arbitrary unbiased mutation operator. This situation is notably different, since the stochastic domination argument used for the lower bound by Witt no longer holds. In particular, starting closer to the optimum is not necessarily an advantage, and OneMax is no longer the easiest function for arbitrary starting positions. Nevertheless, we show that Witt's result carries over if $p_1$ is not too small, with different constraints for upper and lower bounds, and if the number of flipped bits has bounded expectation~$χ$. Notably, this includes some of the heavy-tail mutation operators used in fast genetic algorithms, but not all of them. We also give examples showing that algorithms with unbounded $χ$ have qualitatively different trajectories close to the optimum.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2024

Using the Empirical Attainment Function for Analyzing Single-objective Black-box Optimization Algorithms

A widely accepted way to assess the performance of iterative black-box optimizers is to analyze their empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of pre-defined quality targets achieved not later than a given runtime. In this work, we consider an alternative approach, based on the empirical attainment function (EAF) and we show that the target-based ECDF is an approximation of the EAF. We argue that the EAF has several advantages over the target-based ECDF. In particular, it does not require defining a priori quality targets per function, captures performance differences more precisely, and enables the use of additional summary statistics that enrich the analysis. We also show that the average area over the convergence curves is a simpler-to-calculate, but equivalent, measure of anytime performance. To facilitate the accessibility of the EAF, we integrate a module to compute it into the IOHanalyzer platform. Finally, we illustrate the use of the EAF via synthetic examples and via the data available for the BBOB suite.

math.OC↗

arXiv2024

Transforming the Challenge of Constructing Low-Discrepancy Point Sets into a Permutation Selection Problem

Low discrepancy point sets have been widely used as a tool to approximate continuous objects by discrete ones in numerical processes, for example in numerical integration. Following a century of research on the topic, it is still unclear how low the discrepancy of point sets can go; in other words, how regularly distributed can points be in a given space. Recent insights using optimization and machine learning techniques have led to substantial improvements in the construction of low-discrepancy point sets, resulting in configurations of much lower discrepancy values than previously known. Building on the optimal constructions, we present a simple way to obtain $L_{\infty}$-optimized placement of points that follow the same relative order as an (arbitrary) input set. Applying this approach to point sets in dimensions 2 and 3 for up to 400 and 50 points, respectively, we obtain point sets whose $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancies are up to 25% smaller than those of the current-best sets, and around 50% better than classical constructions such as the Fibonacci set.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

Hybridizing Target- and SHAP-encoded Features for Algorithm Selection in Mixed-variable Black-box Optimization

Exploratory landscape analysis (ELA) is a well-established tool to characterize optimization problems via numerical features. ELA is used for problem comprehension, algorithm design, and applications such as automated algorithm selection and configuration. Until recently, however, ELA was limited to search spaces with either continuous or discrete variables, neglecting problems with mixed variable types. This gap was addressed in a recent study that uses an approach based on target-encoding to compute exploratory landscape features for mixedvariable problems. In this work, we investigate an alternative encoding scheme based on SHAP values. While these features do not lead to better results in the algorithm selection setting considered in previous work, the two different encoding mechanisms exhibit complementary performance. Combining both feature sets into a hybrid approach outperforms each encoding mechanism individually. Finally, we experiment with two different ways of meta-selecting between the two feature sets. Both approaches are capable of taking advantage of the performance complementarity of the models trained on target-encoded and SHAP-encoded feature sets, respectively.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2024

Comparison of High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization Algorithms on BBOB

Bayesian Optimization (BO) is a class of black-box, surrogate-based heuristics that can efficiently optimize problems that are expensive to evaluate, and hence admit only small evaluation budgets. BO is particularly popular for solving numerical optimization problems in industry, where the evaluation of objective functions often relies on time-consuming simulations or physical experiments. However, many industrial problems depend on a large number of parameters. This poses a challenge for BO algorithms, whose performance is often reported to suffer when the dimension grows beyond 15 variables. Although many new algorithms have been proposed to address this problem, it is not well understood which one is the best for which optimization scenario. In this work, we compare five state-of-the-art high-dimensional BO algorithms, with vanilla BO and CMA-ES on the 24 BBOB functions of the COCO environment at increasing dimensionality, ranging from 10 to 60 variables. Our results confirm the superiority of BO over CMA-ES for limited evaluation budgets and suggest that the most promising approach to improve BO is the use of trust regions. However, we also observe significant performance differences for different function landscapes and budget exploitation phases, indicating improvement potential, e.g., through hybridization of algorithmic components.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Quantifying Individual and Joint Module Impact in Modular Optimization Frameworks

This study explores the influence of modules on the performance of modular optimization frameworks for continuous single-objective black-box optimization. There is an extensive variety of modules to choose from when designing algorithm variants, however, there is a rather limited understanding of how each module individually influences the algorithm performance and how the modules interact with each other when combined. We use the functional ANOVA (f-ANOVA) framework to quantify the influence of individual modules and module combinations for two algorithms, the modular Covariance Matrix Adaptation (modCMA) and the modular Differential Evolution (modDE). We analyze the performance data from 324 modCMA and 576 modDE variants on the BBOB benchmark collection, for two problem dimensions, and three computational budgets. Noteworthy findings include the identification of important modules that strongly influence the performance of modCMA, such as the~\textit{weights\ option} and~\textit{mirrored} modules for low dimensional problems, and the~\textit{base\ sampler} for high dimensional problems. The large individual influence of the~\textit{lpsr} module makes it very important for the performance of modDE, regardless of the problem dimensionality and the computational budget. When comparing modCMA and modDE, modDE undergoes a shift from individual modules being more influential, to module combinations being more influential, while modCMA follows the opposite pattern, with an increase in problem dimensionality and computational budget.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2024

Generalization Ability of Feature-based Performance Prediction Models: A Statistical Analysis across Benchmarks

This study examines the generalization ability of algorithm performance prediction models across various benchmark suites. Comparing the statistical similarity between the problem collections with the accuracy of performance prediction models that are based on exploratory landscape analysis features, we observe that there is a positive correlation between these two measures. Specifically, when the high-dimensional feature value distributions between training and testing suites lack statistical significance, the model tends to generalize well, in the sense that the testing errors are in the same range as the training errors. Two experiments validate these findings: one involving the standard benchmark suites, the BBOB and CEC collections, and another using five collections of affine combinations of BBOB problem instances.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Empirical Analysis of the Dynamic Binary Value Problem with IOHprofiler

Optimization problems in dynamic environments have recently been the source of several theoretical studies. One of these problems is the monotonic Dynamic Binary Value problem, which theoretically has high discriminatory power between different Genetic Algorithms. Given this theoretical foundation, we integrate several versions of this problem into the IOHprofiler benchmarking framework. Using this integration, we perform several large-scale benchmarking experiments to both recreate theoretical results on moderate dimensional problems and investigate aspects of GA's performance which have not yet been studied theoretically. Our results highlight some of the many synergies between theory and benchmarking and offer a platform through which further research into dynamic optimization problems can be performed.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2024

Impact of Training Instance Selection on Automated Algorithm Selection Models for Numerical Black-box Optimization

The recently proposed MA-BBOB function generator provides a way to create numerical black-box benchmark problems based on the well-established BBOB suite. Initial studies on this generator highlighted its ability to smoothly transition between the component functions, both from a low-level landscape feature perspective, as well as with regard to algorithm performance. This suggests that MA-BBOB-generated functions can be an ideal testbed for automated machine learning methods, such as automated algorithm selection (AAS). In this paper, we generate 11800 functions in dimensions $d=2$ and $d=5$, respectively, and analyze the potential gains from AAS by studying performance complementarity within a set of eight algorithms. We combine this performance data with exploratory landscape features to create an AAS pipeline that we use to investigate how to efficiently select training sets within this space. We show that simply using the BBOB component functions for training yields poor test performance, while the ranking between uniformly chosen and diversity-based training sets strongly depends on the distribution of the test set.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2024

Heuristic Approaches to Obtain Low-Discrepancy Point Sets via Subset Selection

Building upon the exact methods presented in our earlier work [J. Complexity, 2022], we introduce a heuristic approach for the star discrepancy subset selection problem. The heuristic gradually improves the current-best subset by replacing one of its elements at a time. While we prove that the heuristic does not necessarily return an optimal solution, we obtain very promising results for all tested dimensions. For example, for moderate point set sizes $30 \leq n \leq 240$ in dimension 6, we obtain point sets with $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy up to 35% better than that of the first $n$ points of the Sobol' sequence. Our heuristic works in all dimensions, the main limitation being the precision of the discrepancy calculation algorithms. We also provide a comparison with a recent energy functional introduced by Steinerberger [J. Complexity, 2019], showing that our heuristic performs better on all tested instances.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

Constructing Optimal $L_{\infty}$ Star Discrepancy Sets

The $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy is a very well-studied measure used to quantify the uniformity of a point set distribution. Constructing optimal point sets for this measure is seen as a very hard problem in the discrepancy community. Indeed, optimal point sets are, up to now, known only for $n\leq 6$ in dimension 2 and $n \leq 2$ for higher dimensions. We introduce in this paper mathematical programming formulations to construct point sets with as low $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy as possible. Firstly, we present two models to construct optimal sets and show that there always exist optimal sets with the property that no two points share a coordinate. Then, we provide possible extensions of our models to other measures, such as the extreme and periodic discrepancies. For the $L_{\infty}$ star discrepancy, we are able to compute optimal point sets for up to 21 points in dimension 2 and for up to 8 points in dimension 3. For $d=2$ and $n\ge 7$ points, these point sets have around a 50% lower discrepancy than the current best point sets, and show a very different structure.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2024

Large-scale Benchmarking of Metaphor-based Optimization Heuristics

The number of proposed iterative optimization heuristics is growing steadily, and with this growth, there have been many points of discussion within the wider community. One particular criticism that is raised towards many new algorithms is their focus on metaphors used to present the method, rather than emphasizing their potential algorithmic contributions. Several studies into popular metaphor-based algorithms have highlighted these problems, even showcasing algorithms that are functionally equivalent to older existing methods. Unfortunately, this detailed approach is not scalable to the whole set of metaphor-based algorithms. Because of this, we investigate ways in which benchmarking can shed light on these algorithms. To this end, we run a set of 294 algorithm implementations on the BBOB function suite. We investigate how the choice of the budget, the performance measure, or other aspects of experimental design impact the comparison of these algorithms. Our results emphasize why benchmarking is a key step in expanding our understanding of the algorithm space, and what challenges still need to be overcome to fully gauge the potential improvements to the state-of-the-art hiding behind the metaphors.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2024

Optimizing with Low Budgets: a Comparison on the Black-box Optimization Benchmarking Suite and OpenAI Gym

The growing ubiquity of machine learning (ML) has led it to enter various areas of computer science, including black-box optimization (BBO). Recent research is particularly concerned with Bayesian optimization (BO). BO-based algorithms are popular in the ML community, as they are used for hyperparameter optimization and more generally for algorithm configuration. However, their efficiency decreases as the dimensionality of the problem and the budget of evaluations increase. Meanwhile, derivative-free optimization methods have evolved independently in the optimization community. Therefore, we urge to understand whether cross-fertilization is possible between the two communities, ML and BBO, i.e., whether algorithms that are heavily used in ML also work well in BBO and vice versa. Comparative experiments often involve rather small benchmarks and show visible problems in the experimental setup, such as poor initialization of baselines, overfitting due to problem-specific setting of hyperparameters, and low statistical significance. With this paper, we update and extend a comparative study presented by Hutter et al. in 2013. We compare BBO tools for ML with more classical heuristics, first on the well-known BBOB benchmark suite from the COCO environment and then on Direct Policy Search for OpenAI Gym, a reinforcement learning benchmark. Our results confirm that BO-based optimizers perform well on both benchmarks when budgets are limited, albeit with a higher computational cost, while they are often outperformed by algorithms from other families when the evaluation budget becomes larger. We also show that some algorithms from the BBO community perform surprisingly well on ML tasks.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

MA-BBOB: A Problem Generator for Black-Box Optimization Using Affine Combinations and Shifts

Choosing a set of benchmark problems is often a key component of any empirical evaluation of iterative optimization heuristics. In continuous, single-objective optimization, several sets of problems have become widespread, including the well-established BBOB suite. While this suite is designed to enable rigorous benchmarking, it is also commonly used for testing methods such as algorithm selection, which the suite was never designed around. We present the MA-BBOB function generator, which uses the BBOB suite as component functions in an affine combination. In this work, we describe the full procedure to create these affine combinations and highlight the trade-offs of several design decisions, specifically the choice to place the optimum uniformly at random in the domain. We then illustrate how this generator can be used to gain more low-level insight into the function landscapes through the use of exploratory landscape analysis. Finally, we show a potential use-case of MA-BBOB in generating a wide set of training and testing data for algorithm selectors. Using this setup, we show that the basic scheme of using a set of landscape features to predict the best algorithm does not lead to optimal results, and that an algorithm selector trained purely on the BBOB functions generalizes poorly to the affine combinations.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2023

PS-AAS: Portfolio Selection for Automated Algorithm Selection in Black-Box Optimization

The performance of automated algorithm selection (AAS) strongly depends on the portfolio of algorithms to choose from. Selecting the portfolio is a non-trivial task that requires balancing the trade-off between the higher flexibility of large portfolios with the increased complexity of the AAS task. In practice, probably the most common way to choose the algorithms for the portfolio is a greedy selection of the algorithms that perform well in some reference tasks of interest. We set out in this work to investigate alternative, data-driven portfolio selection techniques. Our proposed method creates algorithm behavior meta-representations, constructs a graph from a set of algorithms based on their meta-representation similarity, and applies a graph algorithm to select a final portfolio of diverse, representative, and non-redundant algorithms. We evaluate two distinct meta-representation techniques (SHAP and performance2vec) for selecting complementary portfolios from a total of 324 different variants of CMA-ES for the task of optimizing the BBOB single-objective problems in dimensionalities 5 and 30 with different cut-off budgets. We test two types of portfolios: one related to overall algorithm behavior and the `personalized' one (related to algorithm behavior per each problem separately). We observe that the approach built on the performance2vec-based representations favors small portfolios with negligible error in the AAS task relative to the virtual best solver from the selected portfolio, whereas the portfolios built from the SHAP-based representations gain from higher flexibility at the cost of decreased performance of the AAS. Across most considered scenarios, personalized portfolios yield comparable or slightly better performance than the classical greedy approach. They outperform the full portfolio in all scenarios.

cs.LG↗