Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Carole-Jean Wu

Publications and source records attributed to Carole-Jean Wu.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Understanding Data Storage and Ingestion for Large-Scale Deep Recommendation Model Training

Datacenter-scale AI training clusters consisting of thousands of domain-specific accelerators (DSA) are used to train increasingly-complex deep learning models. These clusters rely on a data storage and ingestion (DSI) pipeline, responsible for storing exabytes of training data and serving it at tens of terabytes per second. As DSAs continue to push training efficiency and throughput, the DSI pipeline is becoming the dominating factor that constrains the overall training performance and capacity. Innovations that improve the efficiency and performance of DSI systems and hardware are urgent, demanding a deep understanding of DSI characteristics and infrastructure at scale. This paper presents Meta's end-to-end DSI pipeline, composed of a central data warehouse built on distributed storage and a Data PreProcessing Service that scales to eliminate data stalls. We characterize how hundreds of models are collaboratively trained across geo-distributed datacenters via diverse and continuous training jobs. These training jobs read and heavily filter massive and evolving datasets, resulting in popular features and samples used across training jobs. We measure the intense network, memory, and compute resources required by each training job to preprocess samples during training. Finally, we synthesize key takeaways based on our production infrastructure characterization. These include identifying hardware bottlenecks, discussing opportunities for heterogeneous DSI hardware, motivating research in datacenter scheduling and benchmark datasets, and assimilating lessons learned in optimizing DSI infrastructure.

cs.DC↗

Hercules: Heterogeneity-Aware Inference Serving for At-Scale Personalized Recommendation

Personalized recommendation is an important class of deep-learning applications that powers a large collection of internet services and consumes a considerable amount of datacenter resources. As the scale of production-grade recommendation systems continues to grow, optimizing their serving performance and efficiency in a heterogeneous datacenter is important and can translate into infrastructure capacity saving. In this paper, we propose Hercules, an optimized framework for personalized recommendation inference serving that targets diverse industry-representative models and cloud-scale heterogeneous systems. Hercules performs a two-stage optimization procedure - offline profiling and online serving. The first stage searches the large under-explored task scheduling space with a gradient-based search algorithm achieving up to 9.0x latency-bounded throughput improvement on individual servers; it also identifies the optimal heterogeneous server architecture for each recommendation workload. The second stage performs heterogeneity-aware cluster provisioning to optimize resource mapping and allocation in response to fluctuating diurnal loads. The proposed cluster scheduler in Hercules achieves 47.7% cluster capacity saving and reduces the provisioned power by 23.7% over a state-of-the-art greedy scheduler.

cs.DC↗

RecShard: Statistical Feature-Based Memory Optimization for Industry-Scale Neural Recommendation

We propose RecShard, a fine-grained embedding table (EMB) partitioning and placement technique for deep learning recommendation models (DLRMs). RecShard is designed based on two key observations. First, not all EMBs are equal, nor all rows within an EMB are equal in terms of access patterns. EMBs exhibit distinct memory characteristics, providing performance optimization opportunities for intelligent EMB partitioning and placement across a tiered memory hierarchy. Second, in modern DLRMs, EMBs function as hash tables. As a result, EMBs display interesting phenomena, such as the birthday paradox, leaving EMBs severely under-utilized. RecShard determines an optimal EMB sharding strategy for a set of EMBs based on training data distributions and model characteristics, along with the bandwidth characteristics of the underlying tiered memory hierarchy. In doing so, RecShard achieves over 6 times higher EMB training throughput on average for capacity constrained DLRMs. The throughput increase comes from improved EMB load balance by over 12 times and from the reduced access to the slower memory by over 87 times.

cs.LG↗

On Sampling Collaborative Filtering Datasets

We study the practical consequences of dataset sampling strategies on the ranking performance of recommendation algorithms. Recommender systems are generally trained and evaluated on samples of larger datasets. Samples are often taken in a naive or ad-hoc fashion: e.g. by sampling a dataset randomly or by selecting users or items with many interactions. As we demonstrate, commonly-used data sampling schemes can have significant consequences on algorithm performance. Following this observation, this paper makes three main contributions: (1) characterizing the effect of sampling on algorithm performance, in terms of algorithm and dataset characteristics (e.g. sparsity characteristics, sequential dynamics, etc.); (2) designing SVP-CF, which is a data-specific sampling strategy, that aims to preserve the relative performance of models after sampling, and is especially suited to long-tailed interaction data; and (3) developing an oracle, Data-Genie, which can suggest the sampling scheme that is most likely to preserve model performance for a given dataset. The main benefit of Data-Genie is that it will allow recommender system practitioners to quickly prototype and compare various approaches, while remaining confident that algorithm performance will be preserved, once the algorithm is retrained and deployed on the complete data. Detailed experiments show that using Data-Genie, we can discard upto 5x more data than any sampling strategy with the same level of performance.

cs.LG↗

Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities

This paper explores the environmental impact of the super-linear growth trends for AI from a holistic perspective, spanning Data, Algorithms, and System Hardware. We characterize the carbon footprint of AI computing by examining the model development cycle across industry-scale machine learning use cases and, at the same time, considering the life cycle of system hardware. Taking a step further, we capture the operational and manufacturing carbon footprint of AI computing and present an end-to-end analysis for what and how hardware-software design and at-scale optimization can help reduce the overall carbon footprint of AI. Based on the industry experience and lessons learned, we share the key challenges and chart out important development directions across the many dimensions of AI. We hope the key messages and insights presented in this paper can inspire the community to advance the field of AI in an environmentally-responsible manner.

cs.LG↗

Socio-Technological Challenges and Opportunities: Paths Forward

Advancements in digital technologies have a bootstrapping effect. The past fifty years of technological innovations from the computer architecture community have brought innovations and orders-of-magnitude efficiency improvements that engender use cases that were not previously possible -- stimulating novel application domains and increasing uses and deployments at an ever-faster pace. Consequently, computing technologies have fueled significant economic growth, creating education opportunities, enabling access to a wider and more diverse spectrum of information, and, at the same time, connecting people of differing needs in the world together. Technology must be offered that is inclusive of the world's physical, cultural, and economic diversity, and which is manufactured, used, and recycled with environmental sustainability at the forefront. For the next decades to come, we envision significant cross-disciplinary efforts to build a circular development cycle by placing pervasive connectivity, sustainability, and demographic inclusion at the design forefront in order to sustain and expand the benefits of a technologically rich society. We hope this work will inspire our computing community to take broader and more holistic approaches when developing technological solutions to serve people from different parts of the world.

cs.CY↗

AutoFL: Enabling Heterogeneity-Aware Energy Efficient Federated Learning

Federated learning enables a cluster of decentralized mobile devices at the edge to collaboratively train a shared machine learning model, while keeping all the raw training samples on device. This decentralized training approach is demonstrated as a practical solution to mitigate the risk of privacy leakage. However, enabling efficient FL deployment at the edge is challenging because of non-IID training data distribution, wide system heterogeneity and stochastic-varying runtime effects in the field. This paper jointly optimizes time-to-convergence and energy efficiency of state-of-the-art FL use cases by taking into account the stochastic nature of edge execution. We propose AutoFL by tailor-designing a reinforcement learning algorithm that learns and determines which K participant devices and per-device execution targets for each FL model aggregation round in the presence of stochastic runtime variance, system and data heterogeneity. By considering the unique characteristics of FL edge deployment judiciously, AutoFL achieves 3.6 times faster model convergence time and 4.7 and 5.2 times higher energy efficiency for local clients and globally over the cluster of K participants, respectively.

cs.LG↗

SVP-CF: Selection via Proxy for Collaborative Filtering Data

We study the practical consequences of dataset sampling strategies on the performance of recommendation algorithms. Recommender systems are generally trained and evaluated on samples of larger datasets. Samples are often taken in a naive or ad-hoc fashion: e.g. by sampling a dataset randomly or by selecting users or items with many interactions. As we demonstrate, commonly-used data sampling schemes can have significant consequences on algorithm performance -- masking performance deficiencies in algorithms or altering the relative performance of algorithms, as compared to models trained on the complete dataset. Following this observation, this paper makes the following main contributions: (1) characterizing the effect of sampling on algorithm performance, in terms of algorithm and dataset characteristics (e.g. sparsity characteristics, sequential dynamics, etc.); and (2) designing SVP-CF, which is a data-specific sampling strategy, that aims to preserve the relative performance of models after sampling, and is especially suited to long-tail interaction data. Detailed experiments show that SVP-CF is more accurate than commonly used sampling schemes in retaining the relative ranking of different recommendation algorithms.

cs.IR↗

Low-Precision Hardware Architectures Meet Recommendation Model Inference at Scale

Tremendous success of machine learning (ML) and the unabated growth in ML model complexity motivated many ML-specific designs in both CPU and accelerator architectures to speed up the model inference. While these architectures are diverse, highly optimized low-precision arithmetic is a component shared by most. Impressive compute throughputs are indeed often exhibited by these architectures on benchmark ML models. Nevertheless, production models such as recommendation systems important to Facebook's personalization services are demanding and complex: These systems must serve billions of users per month responsively with low latency while maintaining high prediction accuracy, notwithstanding computations with many tens of billions parameters per inference. Do these low-precision architectures work well with our production recommendation systems? They do. But not without significant effort. We share in this paper our search strategies to adapt reference recommendation models to low-precision hardware, our optimization of low-precision compute kernels, and the design and development of tool chain so as to maintain our models' accuracy throughout their lifespan during which topic trends and users' interests inevitably evolve. Practicing these low-precision technologies helped us save datacenter capacities while deploying models with up to 5X complexity that would otherwise not be deployed on traditional general-purpose CPUs. We believe these lessons from the trenches promote better co-design between hardware architecture and software engineering and advance the state of the art of ML in industry.

cs.LG↗

RecPipe: Co-designing Models and Hardware to Jointly Optimize Recommendation Quality and Performance

Deep learning recommendation systems must provide high quality, personalized content under strict tail-latency targets and high system loads. This paper presents RecPipe, a system to jointly optimize recommendation quality and inference performance. Central to RecPipe is decomposing recommendation models into multi-stage pipelines to maintain quality while reducing compute complexity and exposing distinct parallelism opportunities. RecPipe implements an inference scheduler to map multi-stage recommendation engines onto commodity, heterogeneous platforms (e.g., CPUs, GPUs).While the hardware-aware scheduling improves ranking efficiency, the commodity platforms suffer from many limitations requiring specialized hardware. Thus, we design RecPipeAccel (RPAccel), a custom accelerator that jointly optimizes quality, tail-latency, and system throughput. RPAc-cel is designed specifically to exploit the distinct design space opened via RecPipe. In particular, RPAccel processes queries in sub-batches to pipeline recommendation stages, implements dual static and dynamic embedding caches, a set of top-k filtering units, and a reconfigurable systolic array. Com-pared to prior-art and at iso-quality, we demonstrate that RPAccel improves latency and throughput by 3x and 6x.

cs.AR↗

RecSSD: Near Data Processing for Solid State Drive Based Recommendation Inference

Neural personalized recommendation models are used across a wide variety of datacenter applications including search, social media, and entertainment. State-of-the-art models comprise large embedding tables that have billions of parameters requiring large memory capacities. Unfortunately, large and fast DRAM-based memories levy high infrastructure costs. Conventional SSD-based storage solutions offer an order of magnitude larger capacity, but have worse read latency and bandwidth, degrading inference performance. RecSSD is a near data processing based SSD memory system customized for neural recommendation inference that reduces end-to-end model inference latency by 2X compared to using COTS SSDs across eight industry-representative models.

cs.AR↗

TT-Rec: Tensor Train Compression for Deep Learning Recommendation Models

The memory capacity of embedding tables in deep learning recommendation models (DLRMs) is increasing dramatically from tens of GBs to TBs across the industry. Given the fast growth in DLRMs, novel solutions are urgently needed, in order to enable fast and efficient DLRM innovations. At the same time, this must be done without having to exponentially increase infrastructure capacity demands. In this paper, we demonstrate the promising potential of Tensor Train decomposition for DLRMs (TT-Rec), an important yet under-investigated context. We design and implement optimized kernels (TT-EmbeddingBag) to evaluate the proposed TT-Rec design. TT-EmbeddingBag is 3 times faster than the SOTA TT implementation. The performance of TT-Rec is further optimized with the batched matrix multiplication and caching strategies for embedding vector lookup operations. In addition, we present mathematically and empirically the effect of weight initialization distribution on DLRM accuracy and propose to initialize the tensor cores of TT-Rec following the sampled Gaussian distribution. We evaluate TT-Rec across three important design space dimensions -- memory capacity, accuracy, and timing performance -- by training MLPerf-DLRM with Criteo's Kaggle and Terabyte data sets. TT-Rec achieves 117 times and 112 times model size compression, for Kaggle and Terabyte, respectively. This impressive model size reduction can come with no accuracy nor training time overhead as compared to the uncompressed baseline.

cs.LG↗

Understanding Capacity-Driven Scale-Out Neural Recommendation Inference

Deep learning recommendation models have grown to the terabyte scale. Traditional serving schemes--that load entire models to a single server--are unable to support this scale. One approach to support this scale is with distributed serving, or distributed inference, which divides the memory requirements of a single large model across multiple servers. This work is a first-step for the systems research community to develop novel model-serving solutions, given the huge system design space. Large-scale deep recommender systems are a novel workload and vital to study, as they consume up to 79% of all inference cycles in the data center. To that end, this work describes and characterizes scale-out deep learning recommendation inference using data-center serving infrastructure. This work specifically explores latency-bounded inference systems, compared to the throughput-oriented training systems of other recent works. We find that the latency and compute overheads of distributed inference are largely a result of a model's static embedding table distribution and sparsity of input inference requests. We further evaluate three embedding table mapping strategies of three DLRM-like models and specify challenging design trade-offs in terms of end-to-end latency, compute overhead, and resource efficiency. Overall, we observe only a marginal latency overhead when the data-center scale recommendation models are served with the distributed inference manner--P99 latency is increased by only 1% in the best case configuration. The latency overheads are largely a result of the commodity infrastructure used and the sparsity of embedding tables. Even more encouragingly, we also show how distributed inference can account for efficiency improvements in data-center scale recommendation serving.

cs.DC↗

Understanding Training Efficiency of Deep Learning Recommendation Models at Scale

The use of GPUs has proliferated for machine learning workflows and is now considered mainstream for many deep learning models. Meanwhile, when training state-of-the-art personal recommendation models, which consume the highest number of compute cycles at our large-scale datacenters, the use of GPUs came with various challenges due to having both compute-intensive and memory-intensive components. GPU performance and efficiency of these recommendation models are largely affected by model architecture configurations such as dense and sparse features, MLP dimensions. Furthermore, these models often contain large embedding tables that do not fit into limited GPU memory. The goal of this paper is to explain the intricacies of using GPUs for training recommendation models, factors affecting hardware efficiency at scale, and learnings from a new scale-up GPU server design, Zion.

cs.AR↗

CPR: Understanding and Improving Failure Tolerant Training for Deep Learning Recommendation with Partial Recovery

The paper proposes and optimizes a partial recovery training system, CPR, for recommendation models. CPR relaxes the consistency requirement by enabling non-failed nodes to proceed without loading checkpoints when a node fails during training, improving failure-related overheads. The paper is the first to the extent of our knowledge to perform a data-driven, in-depth analysis of applying partial recovery to recommendation models and identified a trade-off between accuracy and performance. Motivated by the analysis, we present CPR, a partial recovery training system that can reduce the training time and maintain the desired level of model accuracy by (1) estimating the benefit of partial recovery, (2) selecting an appropriate checkpoint saving interval, and (3) prioritizing to save updates of more frequently accessed parameters. Two variants of CPR, CPR-MFU and CPR-SSU, reduce the checkpoint-related overhead from 8.2-8.5% to 0.53-0.68% compared to full recovery, on a configuration emulating the failure pattern and overhead of a production-scale cluster. While reducing overhead significantly, CPR achieves model quality on par with the more expensive full recovery scheme, training the state-of-the-art recommendation model using Criteo's Ads CTR dataset. Our preliminary results also suggest that CPR can speed up training on a real production-scale cluster, without notably degrading the accuracy.

cs.LG↗

Chasing Carbon: The Elusive Environmental Footprint of Computing

Given recent algorithm, software, and hardware innovation, computing has enabled a plethora of new applications. As computing becomes increasingly ubiquitous, however, so does its environmental impact. This paper brings the issue to the attention of computer-systems researchers. Our analysis, built on industry-reported characterization, quantifies the environmental effects of computing in terms of carbon emissions. Broadly, carbon emissions have two sources: operational energy consumption, and hardware manufacturing and infrastructure. Although carbon emissions from the former are decreasing thanks to algorithmic, software, and hardware innovations that boost performance and power efficiency, the overall carbon footprint of computer systems continues to grow. This work quantifies the carbon output of computer systems to show that most emissions related to modern mobile and data-center equipment come from hardware manufacturing and infrastructure. We therefore outline future directions for minimizing the environmental impact of computing systems.

cs.AR↗

Cross-Stack Workload Characterization of Deep Recommendation Systems

Deep learning based recommendation systems form the backbone of most personalized cloud services. Though the computer architecture community has recently started to take notice of deep recommendation inference, the resulting solutions have taken wildly different approaches - ranging from near memory processing to at-scale optimizations. To better design future hardware systems for deep recommendation inference, we must first systematically examine and characterize the underlying systems-level impact of design decisions across the different levels of the execution stack. In this paper, we characterize eight industry-representative deep recommendation models at three different levels of the execution stack: algorithms and software, systems platforms, and hardware microarchitectures. Through this cross-stack characterization, we first show that system deployment choices (i.e., CPUs or GPUs, batch size granularity) can give us up to 15x speedup. To better understand the bottlenecks for further optimization, we look at both software operator usage breakdown and CPU frontend and backend microarchitectural inefficiencies. Finally, we model the correlation between key algorithmic model architecture features and hardware bottlenecks, revealing the absence of a single dominant algorithmic component behind each hardware bottleneck.

cs.AR↗

Exploiting Parallelism Opportunities with Deep Learning Frameworks

State-of-the-art machine learning frameworks support a wide variety of design features to enable a flexible machine learning programming interface and to ease the programmability burden on machine learning developers. Identifying and using a performance-optimal setting in feature-rich frameworks, however, involves a non-trivial amount of performance profiling efforts and often relies on domain-specific knowledge. This paper takes a deep dive into analyzing the performance impact of key design features in a machine learning framework and quantifies the role of parallelism. The observations and insights distill into a simple set of guidelines that one can use to achieve much higher training and inference speedup. Across a diverse set of real-world deep learning models, the evaluation results show that the proposed performance tuning guidelines outperform the Intel and TensorFlow recommended settings by 1.29x and 1.34x, respectively.

cs.LG↗