arXiv subjects

Carolina Caetano

Publications and source records attributed to Carolina Caetano.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Difference-in-differences with "bad controls"

This paper considers difference-in-differences identification strategies when the parallel trends assumption holds after conditioning on covariates that may themselves be affected by the treatment (often referred to as "bad controls"). We show that common approaches such as simply dropping bad controls are often ill-advised and develop two alternative approaches that allow bad controls to function as genuine controls despite being affected by treatment. First, we derive explicit conditions that rationalize conditioning only on pre-treatment values of the bad control, leading naturally to the Callaway and Sant'Anna (2021) estimator with pre-treatment values as covariates. Second, under a covariate unconfoundedness condition, we develop imputation and double/debiased machine learning estimators that recover the average treatment effect on the treated. We extend these results to staggered treatment adoption, provide pre-tests for the identifying assumptions, and apply the methods to study the effects of job displacement on earnings.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Difference-in-Differences when Parallel Trends Holds Conditional on Covariates

We consider difference-in-differences identification and estimation strategies when the parallel trends assumption holds conditional on covariates, which can be time-varying, time-invariant, or both. We uncover several weaknesses of two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions in this context. The most important, which we call \textit{hidden linearity bias}, arises because transformations that eliminate unit fixed effects also transform the covariates, either implicitly changing the identification strategy or relying on correct model specification. We provide diagnostics for assessing a TWFE regression's susceptibility to hidden linearity bias and propose alternative estimation strategies that circumvent these issues.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Identification and Estimation in Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Designs with Covariates

We study fuzzy regression discontinuity designs with covariates and characterize the weighted averages of conditional local average treatment effects (WLATEs) that are point identified. Any identified WLATE equals a Wald ratio of conditional reduced-form and first-stage discontinuities. We highlight the Compliance-Weighted LATE (CWLATE), which weights cells by squared first-stage discontinuities and maximizes first-stage strength. For discrete covariates, we provide simple estimators and robust bias-corrected inference. In simulations calibrated to common designs, CWLATE improves stability and reduces mean squared error relative to standard fuzzy RDD estimators when compliance varies. An application to Uruguayan cash transfers during pregnancy yields precise RDD-based effects on low birthweight.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Causal Inference for Aggregated Treatment

In this paper, we study causal inference when the treatment variable is an aggregation of multiple sub-treatment variables. Researchers often report marginal causal effects for the aggregated treatment, implicitly assuming that the target parameter corresponds to a well-defined average of sub-treatment effects. We show that, even in an ideal scenario for causal inference such as random assignment, the weights underlying this average have some key undesirable properties: they are not unique, they can be negative, and, holding all else constant, these issues become exponentially more likely to occur as the number of sub-treatments increases and the support of each sub-treatment grows. We propose approaches to avoid these problems, depending on whether or not the sub-treatment variables are observed.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2025

Identification of Causal Effects with a Bunching Design

We show that causal effects can be identified when there is bunching in the distribution of a continuous treatment variable, without imposing any parametric assumptions. This yields a new nonparametric method for overcoming selection bias in the absence of instrumental variables, panel data, or other popular research designs for causal inference. The method leverages the change of variables theorem from integration theory, relating the selection bias to the ratio of the density of the treatment and the density of the part of the outcome that varies with confounders. At the bunching point, the treatment level is constant, so the variation in the outcomes is due entirely to unobservables, allowing us to identify the denominator. Our main result identifies the average causal response to the treatment among individuals who marginally select into the bunching point. We further show that under additional smoothness assumptions on the selection bias, treatment effects away from the bunching point may also be identified. We propose estimators based on standard software packages and apply the method to estimate the effect of maternal smoking during pregnancy on birth weight.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2024

Difference in Differences with Time-Varying Covariates

This paper considers identification and estimation of causal effect parameters from participating in a binary treatment in a difference in differences (DID) setup when the parallel trends assumption holds after conditioning on observed covariates. Relative to existing work in the econometrics literature, we consider the case where the value of covariates can change over time and, potentially, where participating in the treatment can affect the covariates themselves. We propose new empirical strategies in both cases. We also consider two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions that include time-varying regressors, which is the most common way that DID identification strategies are implemented under conditional parallel trends. We show that, even in the case with only two time periods, these TWFE regressions are not generally robust to (i) time-varying covariates being affected by the treatment, (ii) treatment effects and/or paths of untreated potential outcomes depending on the level of time-varying covariates in addition to only the change in the covariates over time, (iii) treatment effects and/or paths of untreated potential outcomes depending on time-invariant covariates, (iv) treatment effect heterogeneity with respect to observed covariates, and (v) violations of strong functional form assumptions, both for outcomes over time and the propensity score, that are unlikely to be plausible in most DID applications. Thus, TWFE regressions can deliver misleading estimates of causal effect parameters in a number of empirically relevant cases. We propose both doubly robust estimands and regression adjustment/imputation strategies that are robust to these issues while not being substantially more challenging to implement.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2020

Regression Discontinuity Design with Multivalued Treatments

We study identification and estimation in the Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD) with a multivalued treatment variable. We also allow for the inclusion of covariates. We show that without additional information, treatment effects are not identified. We give necessary and sufficient conditions that lead to identification of LATEs as well as of weighted averages of the conditional LATEs. We show that if the first stage discontinuities of the multiple treatments conditional on covariates are linearly independent, then it is possible to identify multivariate weighted averages of the treatment effects with convenient identifiable weights. If, moreover, treatment effects do not vary with some covariates or a flexible parametric structure can be assumed, it is possible to identify (in fact, over-identify) all the treatment effects. The over-identification can be used to test these assumptions. We propose a simple estimator, which can be programmed in packaged software as a Two-Stage Least Squares regression, and packaged standard errors and tests can also be used. Finally, we implement our approach to identify the effects of different types of insurance coverage on health care utilization, as in Card, Dobkin and Maestas (2008).

econ.EM↗