arXiv subjects

Carrie Diaz Eaton

Publications and source records attributed to Carrie Diaz Eaton.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Community-driven data science practices

Mathematics researchers are becoming more involved with research questions at the interface of data science and social justice. This type of research needs to be grounded in the needs of the community in order to have significant impact. In this paper, we examine two examples of community-research partnerships in data science for social justice co-authored by both community members and mathematical researchers. The first, VECINA, is a place-based community-research partnership focused on environmental justice. VECINA introduces a framework for developing fruitful local collaborations. The second example, SToPA, originates in citizens' request for an analysis of their town's policing data, but focuses on how to scale this work beyond that place-based setting. SToPA's research helps us imagine how we can continue to actively collaborate with community members even when working to scale projects beyond a single community. In both of these case studies, we examine the harmonies between established principles of power, process, and perspective with our framework for research-community partnerships. We use a duoethnography approach, directly illustrating the experiences of researchers. We also offer a set of reflections on the impact of these research-community partnerships.

math.HO↗

arXiv2024

Quantifying and Documenting Inequity in PhD-granting Mathematical Sciences Departments in the United States

We provide an example of the application of quantitative techniques, tools, and topics from mathematics and data science to analyze the mathematics community itself in order to quantify and document inequity in our discipline. This work is a contribution to the new and growing interdisciplinary field recently termed "mathematics of Mathematics," or "MetaMath." Using data about PhD-granting institutions in the United States and publicly available funding data from the National Science Foundation, we highlight inequalities in departments at U.S. institutions of higher education that produce PhDs in the mathematical sciences. Specifically, we determine that a small fraction of mathematical sciences departments receive a large majority of federal funding awarded to support mathematics in the United States. Additionally, we identify the extent to which women faculty members are underrepresented in mathematical sciences PhD-granting institutions in the United States. We also show that this underrepresentation of women faculty is even more pronounced in departments that received more federal grant funding.

math.HO↗

arXiv2023

Data science and social justice in the mathematics community

Data science for social justice (DS4SJ) is data-scientific work that supports the liberation of oppressed and marginalized people. By nature, this work lies at the intersection of technical scholarship and activist practice. We discuss this growing efforts in DS4SJ within the broad mathematics community. We begin by defining terms and offering a series of guiding principles for engaging in critical data science work, providing examples of how these principles play out in practice. We then highlight the roles that DS4SJ can play in the scholarship and pedagogy of practicing mathematicians. We focus in particular on the engagement of early-career mathematicians in DS4SJ, which we illustrate through a series of four personal vignettes. While the primary aim of DS4SJ is to achieve impact for marginalized communities, we also argue that engagement with DS4SJ can benefit the entire mathematical ecosystem, including researchers, instructors, students, departments, institutes, and professional societies. We close with reflections on how these various actors can support ongoing efforts in data science for social justice.

math.HO↗

arXiv2023

On definitions of "mathematician"

The definition of who is or what makes a ``mathematician" is an important and urgent issue to be addressed in the mathematics community. Too often, a narrower definition of who is considered a mathematician (and what is considered mathematics) is used to exclude people from the discipline -- both explicitly and implicitly. However, using a narrow definition of a mathematician allows us to examine and challenge systemic barriers that exist in certain spaces of the community. This paper explores and illuminates tensions between narrow and broad definitions and how they can be used to promote both inclusion and exclusion simultaneously. In this article, we present a framework of definitions based on identity, function, and qualification and exploring several different meanings of ``mathematician". By interrogating various definitions, we highlight their risks and opportunities, with an emphasis on implications for broadening and/or narrowing participation of underrepresented groups.

math.HO↗

arXiv2020

Comparing demographics of signatories to public letters on diversity in the mathematical sciences

In its December 2019 edition, the \textit{Notices of the American Mathematical Society} published an essay critical of the use of diversity statements in academic hiring. The publication of this essay prompted many responses, including three public letters circulated within the mathematical sciences community. Each letter was signed by hundreds of people and was published online, also by the American Mathematical Society. We report on a study of the signatories' demographics, which we infer using a crowdsourcing approach. Letter A highlights diversity and social justice. The pool of signatories contains relatively more individuals inferred to be women and/or members of underrepresented ethnic groups. Moreover, this pool is diverse with respect to the levels of professional security and types of academic institutions represented. Letter B does not comment on diversity, but rather, asks for discussion and debate. This letter was signed by a strong majority of individuals inferred to be white men in professionally secure positions at highly research intensive universities. Letter C speaks out specifically against diversity statements, calling them "a mistake," and claiming that their usage during early stages of faculty hiring "diminishes mathematical achievement." Individuals who signed both Letters B and C, that is, signatories who both privilege debate and oppose diversity statements, are overwhelmingly inferred to be tenured white men at highly research intensive universities. Our empirical results are consistent with theories of power drawn from the social sciences.

math.HO↗

arXiv2017

A "Rule of Five" Framework for Models and Modeling to Unify Mathematicians and Biologists and Improve Student Learning

Despite widespread calls for the incorporation of mathematical modeling into the undergraduate biology curriculum, there is lack of a common understanding around the definition of modeling, which inhibits progress. In this paper, we extend the "Rule of Four," initially used in calculus reform efforts, to a framework for models and modeling that is inclusive of varying disciplinary definitions of each. This unifying framework allows us to both build on strengths that each discipline and its students bring, but also identify gaps in modeling activities practiced by each discipline. We also discuss benefits to student learning and interdisciplinary collaboration.

math.HO↗

arXiv2014

Collaborative Learning Through Formative Peer Review With Technology

This paper describes a collaboration between a mathematician and a compositionist who developed a sequence of collaborative writing assignments for calculus. This sequence of developmentally-appropriate assignments presents peer review as a collaborative process that promotes reflection, deepens understanding, and improves exposition. First, we distinguish writing-to-learn from writing-in-the-disciplines. Then, we review collaborative writing pedagogies and explain best practices for teaching peer review. Finally, we present an implementation plan and examples of student work that illustrate improved understanding of content and improved exposition.

math.HO↗