Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Cecilia Marie Futsaether

Publications and source records attributed to Cecilia Marie Futsaether.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

RENT -- Repeated Elastic Net Technique for Feature Selection

Feature selection is an essential step in data science pipelines to reduce the complexity associated with large datasets. While much research on this topic focuses on optimizing predictive performance, few studies investigate stability in the context of the feature selection process. In this study, we present the Repeated Elastic Net Technique (RENT) for Feature Selection. RENT uses an ensemble of generalized linear models with elastic net regularization, each trained on distinct subsets of the training data. The feature selection is based on three criteria evaluating the weight distributions of features across all elementary models. This fact leads to the selection of features with high stability that improve the robustness of the final model. Furthermore, unlike established feature selectors, RENT provides valuable information for model interpretation concerning the identification of objects in the data that are difficult to predict during training. In our experiments, we benchmark RENT against six established feature selectors on eight multivariate datasets for binary classification and regression. In the experimental comparison, RENT shows a well-balanced trade-off between predictive performance and stability. Finally, we underline the additional interpretational value of RENT with an exploratory post-hoc analysis of a healthcare dataset.

cs.LG↗

Deep learning for automatic tumour segmentation in PET/CT images of patients with head and neck cancers

An automatic segmentation algorithm for delineation of the gross tumour volume and pathologic lymph nodes of head and neck cancers in PET/CT images is described. The proposed algorithm is based on a convolutional neural network using the U-Net architecture. Several model hyperparameters were explored and the model performance in terms of the Dice similarity coefficient was validated on images from 15 patients. A separate test set consisting of images from 40 patients was used to assess the generalisability of the algorithm. The performance on the test set showed close-to-oncologist level delineations as measured by the Dice coefficient (CT: $0.65 \pm 0.17$, PET: $0.71 \pm 0.12$, PET/CT: $0.75 \pm 0.12$).

eess.IV↗