arXiv subjects

Cesar B. Rocha

Publications and source records attributed to Cesar B. Rocha.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

Nusselt number scaling in horizontal convection

We report a numerical study of horizontal convection (HC) at Prandtl number $Pr = 1$, with both no-slip and free-slip boundary conditions. We obtain 2D and 3D solutions and determine the relation between the Rayleigh number $Ra$ and the Nusselt number $Nu$. In 2D we vary $Ra$ between $0$ and $10^{14}$. In the range $10^6 \le Ra \le 10^{10}$ the $Nu$-$Ra$ relation is $Nu \sim Ra^{1/5}$. With $Ra$ greater than about $10^{11}$ we find a 2D regime with $Nu \sim Ra^{1/4}$ over three decades, up to the highest 2D $Ra$. In 3D, with maximum $Ra = 10^{11.5}$, we find only $Nu \sim Ra^{1/5}$. These results apply to both free slip and no slip boundary conditions. The $Nu \sim Ra^{1/4}$ regime has a double boundary layer (BL): there is a thin BL with thickness $\sim Ra^{-1/4}$ nested inside a thicker BL with thickness $\sim Ra^{-1/5}$. The $Ra^{-1/4}$ BL thickness, which determines $Nu$, coincides with the Kolmogorov and Batchelor scales of HC. Numerical and theoretical results indicate that 3D HC is qualitatively and quantitatively similar to 2D HC. At the same $Ra$, the 3D $Nu$ exceeds the 2D $Nu$ by less than $20$%, i.e., there is very little 3D enhancement of heat transport. Boundary conditions are more important than dimensionality: the 2D free-slip solutions have larger $Nu$ than 3D no-slip solutions. Using the mechanical energy power integral of HC we show that the mean square vorticity of 3D HC is nearly equal to that of 2D HC at the same $Ra$. Thus vorticity amplification by strain-mediated vortex stretching does not operate in 3D HC.

physics.flu-dyn↗

arXiv2021

Exploiting self-organized criticality in strongly stratified turbulence

A multiscale reduced description of turbulent free shear flows in the presence of strong stabilizing density stratification is derived via asymptotic analysis of the Boussinesq equations in the simultaneous limits of small Froude and large Reynolds numbers. The analysis explicitly recognizes the occurrence of dynamics on disparate spatiotemporal scales, yielding simplified partial differential equations governing the coupled evolution of slow large-scale hydrostatic flows and fast small-scale isotropic instabilities and internal waves. The dynamics captured by the coupled reduced equations is illustrated in the context of two-dimensional strongly stratified Kolmogorov flow. A noteworthy feature of the reduced model is that the fluctuations are constrained to satisfy quasilinear (QL) dynamics about the comparably slowly-varying large-scale fields. Crucially, this QL reduction is not invoked as an ad hoc closure approximation, but rather is derived in a physically relevant and mathematically consistent distinguished limit. Further analysis of the resulting slow-fast QL system shows how the amplitude of the fast stratified-shear instabilities is slaved to the slowly-evolving mean fields to ensure the marginal stability of the latter. Physically, this marginal stability condition appears to be compatible with recent evidence of self-organized criticality in both observations and simulations of stratified turbulence. lgorithmically, the slaving of the fluctuation fields enables numerical simulations to be time-evolved strictly on the slow time scale of the hydrostatic flow. The reduced equations thus provide a solid mathematical foundation for future studies of three-dimensional strongly stratified turbulence in extreme parameter regimes of geophysical relevance and suggest avenues for new sub-grid-scale parameterizations.

physics.flu-dyn↗

arXiv2015

On Gakerkin approximations for the surface-active quasigeostrophic equations

We study the representation of solutions of the three-dimensional quasigeostrophic (QG) equations using Galerkin series with standard vertical modes, with particular attention to the incorporation of active surface buoyancy dynamics. We extend two existing Galerkin approaches (A and B) and develop a new Galerkin approximation (C). Approximation A, due to \cite{flierl1978}, represents the streamfunction as a truncated Galerkin series and defines the potential vorticity (PV) that satisfies the inversion problem exactly. Approximation B, due to \cite{tulloch_smith2009b}, represents the PV as a truncated Galerkin series and calculates the streamfunction that satisfies the inversion problem exactly. Approximation C, the true Galerkin approximation for the QG equations, represents both streamfunction and PV as truncated Galerkin series, but does not satisfy the inversion equation exactly. The three approximations are fundamentally different unless the boundaries are isopycnal surfaces. We discuss the advantages and limitations of approximations A, B, and C in terms of mathematical rigor and conservation laws, and illustrate their relative efficiency by solving linear stability problems with nonzero surface buoyancy. With moderate number of modes, B and C have have superior accuracy than A at high wavenumbers. Because B lacks conservation of energy, we recommend approximation C for constructing solutions to the surface-active QG equations using Galerkin series with standard vertical modes.

physics.ao-ph↗