Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Chad E. Brown

Publications and source records attributed to Chad E. Brown.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Agent Hunt: Bounty Based Collaborative Autoformalization With LLM Agents

We describe an experiment in large-scale autoformalization of algebraic topology in an Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP) environment, where the workload is distributed among multiple LLM-based coding agents. Rather than relying on static central planning, we implement a simulated bounty-based marketplace in which agents dynamically propose new lemmas (formal statements), attach bounties to them, and compete to discharge these proof obligations and claim the bounties. The agents interact directly with the interactive proof system: they can invoke tactics, inspect proof states and goals, analyze tactic successes and failures, and iteratively refine their proof scripts. In addition to constructing proofs, agents may introduce new formal definitions and intermediate lemmas to structure the development. All accepted proofs are ultimately checked and verified by the underlying proof assistant. This setting explores collaborative, decentralized proof search and theory building, and the use of market-inspired mechanisms to scale autoformalization in ITP.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2025

Hammering Higher Order Set Theory

We use automated theorem provers to significantly shorten a formal development in higher order set theory. The development includes many standard theorems such as the fundamental theorem of arithmetic and irrationality of square root of two. Higher order automated theorem provers are particularly useful here, since the underlying framework of higher order set theory coincides with the classical extensional higher order logic of (most) higher order automated theorem provers, so no significant translation or encoding is required. Additionally, many subgoals are first order and so first order automated provers often suffice. We compare the performance of different provers on the subgoals generated from the development. We also discuss possibilities for proof reconstruction, i.e., obtaining formal proof terms when an automated theorem prover claims to have proven the subgoal.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2025

Exploring Formal Math on the Blockchain: An Explorer for Proofgold

Proofgold is a blockchain that supports formalized mathematics alongside standard cryptocurrency functionality. It incorporates logical constructs into the blockchain, including declarations of formal theories, definitions, propositions and proofs. It also supports placing and collecting bounties on proving these propositions, incentivizing the development of the formal libraries contained in Proofgold. In this paper, we present a web-based blockchain explorer for Proofgold. The system exposes not only the usual transactional data but also the formal mathematical components embedded in the chain and allows some interaction with them. The explorer allows users to inspect blocks, transactions, and addresses, as well as formal objects: theories, definitions, theorems and their proofs. We also support the submission of transactions to the blockchain using our interface. We describe the system architecture and its integration with the Proofgold Lava software, highlighting how the explorer supports navigation of formal content and facilitates mathematical knowledge management in a decentralized setting, as well as a number of formalizations in category theory done in the system.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2025

Payment Channels with Proofs

The fundamental building blocks of the Bitcoin lightning network are bidirectional payment channels. We describe an extension of payment channels in the Proofgold network which allow the two parties to bet on whether a proposition will be proven by a certain time. These provide the foundation for a Proofgold lightning network that would allow parties to request proofs (by betting there will be no proof by a certain time) and other parties to provide proofs (and be rewarded by betting there will be a proof). The bets may also provide a way to approximate the probability that a certain proposition is provable (in the given amount of time). We describe the implementation of payment channels supporting proofs in Proofgold and discuss a potential lightning network that could be built as a result. One application of such lightning network would be a large decentralized infrastructure for fast collaborative formalization projects.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2025

SMT and Functional Equation Solving over the Reals: Challenges from the IMO

We use SMT technology to address a class of problems involving uninterpreted functions and nonlinear real arithmetic. In particular, we focus on problems commonly found in mathematical competitions, such as the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO), where the task is to determine all solutions to constraints on an uninterpreted function. Although these problems require only high-school-level mathematics, state-of-the-art SMT solvers often struggle with them. We propose several techniques to improve SMT performance in this setting.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

Tableaux for Automated Reasoning in Dependently-Typed Higher-Order Logic (Extended Version)

Dependent type theory gives an expressive type system facilitating succinct formalizations of mathematical concepts. In practice, it is mainly used for interactive theorem proving with intensional type theories, with PVS being a notable exception. In this paper, we present native rules for automated reasoning in a dependently-typed version (DHOL) of classical higher-order logic (HOL). DHOL has an extensional type theory with an undecidable type checking problem which contains theorem proving. We implemented the inference rules as well as an automatic type checking mode in Lash, a fork of Satallax, the leading tableaux-based prover for HOL. Our method is sound and complete with respect to provability in DHOL. Completeness is guaranteed by the incorporation of a sound and complete translation from DHOL to HOL recently proposed by Rothgang et al. While this translation can already be used as a preprocessing step to any HOL prover, to achieve better performance, our system directly works in DHOL. Moreover, experimental results show that the DHOL version of Lash can outperform all major HOL provers executed on the translation.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

Experiments with Choice in Dependently-Typed Higher-Order Logic

Recently an extension to higher-order logic -- called DHOL -- was introduced, enriching the language with dependent types, and creating a powerful extensional type theory. In this paper we propose two ways how choice can be added to DHOL. We extend the DHOL term structure by Hilbert's indefinite choice operator $ε$, define a translation of the choice terms to HOL choice that extends the existing translation from DHOL to HOL and show that the extension of the translation is complete and give an argument for soundness. We finally evaluate the extended translation on a set of dependent HOL problems that require choice.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

Symbolic Computation for All the Fun

Motivated by the recent 10 million dollar AIMO challenge, this paper targets the problem of finding all functions conforming to a given specification. This is a popular problem at mathematical competitions and it brings about a number of challenges, primarily, synthesizing the possible solutions and proving that no other solutions exist. Often, there are infinitely many solutions and then the set of solutions has to be captured symbolically. We propose an approach to solving this problem and evaluate it on a set of problems that appeared in mathematical competitions and olympics.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

A Formal Proof of R(4,5)=25

In 1995, McKay and Radziszowski proved that the Ramsey number R(4,5) is equal to 25. Their proof relies on a combination of high-level arguments and computational steps. The authors have performed the computational parts of the proof with different implementations in order to reduce the possibility of an error in their programs. In this work, we prove this theorem in the interactive theorem prover HOL4 limiting the uncertainty to the small HOL4 kernel. Instead of verifying their algorithms directly, we rely on the HOL4 interface to MiniSat SAT to prove gluing lemmas. To reduce the number of such lemmas and thus make the computational part of the proof feasible, we implement a generalization algorithm. We verify that its output covers all the possible cases by implementing a custom SAT-solver extended with a graph isomorphism checker.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2023

A Mathematical Benchmark for Inductive Theorem Provers

We present a benchmark of 29687 problems derived from the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS). Each problem expresses the equivalence of two syntactically different programs generating the same OEIS sequence. Such programs were conjectured by a learning-guided synthesis system using a language with looping operators. The operators implement recursion, and thus many of the proofs require induction on natural numbers. The benchmark contains problems of varying difficulty from a wide area of mathematical domains. We believe that these characteristics will make it an effective judge for the progress of inductive theorem provers in this domain for years to come.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2022

Cantor-Bernstein implies Excluded Middle

We prove in constructive logic that the statement of the Cantor-Bernstein theorem implies excluded middle. This establishes that the Cantor-Bernstein theorem can only be proven assuming the full power of classical logic. The key ingredient is a theorem of Martín Escardó stating that quantification over a particular subset of the Cantor space $2^{\mathbb{N}}$, the so-called one-point compactification of $\mathbb{N}$, preserves decidable predicates.

math.LO↗
arXiv2022

Lash 1.0 (System Description)

Lash is a higher-order automated theorem prover created as a fork of the theorem prover Satallax. The basic underlying calculus of Satallax is a ground tableau calculus whose rules only use shallow information about the terms and formulas taking part in the rule. Lash uses new, efficient C representations of vital structures and operations. Most importantly, Lash uses a C representation of (normal) terms with perfect sharing along with a C implementation of normalizing substitutions. We describe the ways in which Lash differs from Satallax and the performance improvement of Lash over Satallax when used with analogous flag settings. With a 10s timeout Lash outperforms Satallax on a collection TH0 problems from the TPTP. We conclude with ideas for continuing the development of Lash.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2020

Can Neural Networks Learn Symbolic Rewriting?

This work investigates if the current neural architectures are adequate for learning symbolic rewriting. Two kinds of data sets are proposed for this research -- one based on automated proofs and the other being a synthetic set of polynomial terms. The experiments with use of the current neural machine translation models are performed and its results are discussed. Ideas for extending this line of research are proposed, and its relevance is motivated.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2020

Prolog Technology Reinforcement Learning Prover

We present a reinforcement learning toolkit for experiments with guiding automated theorem proving in the connection calculus. The core of the toolkit is a compact and easy to extend Prolog-based automated theorem prover called plCoP. plCoP builds on the leanCoP Prolog implementation and adds learning-guided Monte-Carlo Tree Search as done in the rlCoP system. Other components include a Python interface to plCoP and machine learners, and an external proof checker that verifies the validity of plCoP proofs. The toolkit is evaluated on two benchmarks and we demonstrate its extendability by two additions: (1) guidance is extended to reduction steps and (2) the standard leanCoP calculus is extended with rewrite steps and their learned guidance. We argue that the Prolog setting is suitable for combining statistical and symbolic learning methods. The complete toolkit is publicly released.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2019

GRUNGE: A Grand Unified ATP Challenge

This paper describes a large set of related theorem proving problems obtained by translating theorems from the HOL4 standard library into multiple logical formalisms. The formalisms are in higher-order logic (with and without type variables) and first-order logic (possibly with multiple types, and possibly with type variables). The resultant problem sets allow us to run automated theorem provers that support different logical formats on corresponding problems, and compare their performances. This also results in a new "grand unified" large theory benchmark that emulates the ITP/ATP hammer setting, where systems and metasystems can use multiple ATP formalisms in complementary ways, and jointly learn from the accumulated knowledge.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2019

A Tale of Two Set Theories

We describe the relationship between two versions of Tarski-Grothendieck set theory: the first-order set theory of Mizar and the higher-order set theory of Egal. We show how certain higher-order terms and propositions in Egal have equivalent first-order presentations. We then prove Tarski's Axiom A (an axiom in Mizar) in Egal and construct a Grothendieck Universe operator (a primitive with axioms in Egal) in Mizar.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2010

Analytic Tableaux for Simple Type Theory and its First-Order Fragment

We study simple type theory with primitive equality (STT) and its first-order fragment EFO, which restricts equality and quantification to base types but retains lambda abstraction and higher-order variables. As deductive system we employ a cut-free tableau calculus. We consider completeness, compactness, and existence of countable models. We prove these properties for STT with respect to Henkin models and for EFO with respect to standard models. We also show that the tableau system yields a decision procedure for three EFO fragments.

cs.LO↗