Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Charles Nissim-Sabat

Publications and source records attributed to Charles Nissim-Sabat.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Special Relativity Teaches the One-Way Velocity of Light Is Measurable Without Synchronized Clocks and Clocks Are Synchronizable Without One-Way Signals

Recent authors have addressed the Reichenbach assertions that the one-way velocity of light, OWVL, cannot be measured because we lack a method to synchronize distant clocks, and that one needs OWVL to synchronize distant clocks. Thus, one may have any OWVL provided it is greater or equal to c/2 and the round-trip velocity is c, and, since clocks can be synchronized only by light signals, clock synchronization depends on whatever OWVL happens to be. I show that the Dragowski and Wlodarczyk proposal to use transverse Doppler shifts to measure one-way velocities cannot succeed. In fact, OWVL is measurable in a synchronization-free manner by determining the minimum wavelength transmitted by an airgap optical barrier. OWVL along three non-coplanar axes is required to determine that OWVL is c. Also, contrary to the Thyssen claim that distant simultaneity is conventional, I show that, using a moving clock, relativistic time-dilation allows the synchronization of isochronized stationary clocks without knowing OWVL and also allows, separately, the measurement of OWVL. A burst of unstable particles is a suitable moving clock. Thus, one-way velocity and synchronization are shown to be independent concepts. The wavelength transmitted by an airgap and the decay of unstable particles have been neglected regarding OWVL, but all experiments in these areas have found the one-way velocity of light is c.

physics.hist-ph↗

In Self-contradiction, Machian Geocentrism Entails Absolute Space

Luka Popov has attempted to advance Machian physics by maintaining that the heliocentric system must be replaced by Tycho Brahe's geocentric system. We show that while geocentrism relies on Mach's contention that accelerations are relative, this contention is untenable because, inter alia, the consequences of an acceleration of an object with respect to the fixed stars cannot be duplicated by acceleration of the stars with respect to this object and, if the universe and a co-rotating observer have the same angular velocity, this motion is detectable because they have different linear velocities. Also, geocentrism precludes the relativity of accelerations and leads to an absolute space while Mach argued against absolute space, Popov's result that the force exerted by the Earth on the Sun depends on the square of the Sun's mass but is independent of the Earth's mass is paradoxical, and the annual asymmetry of the Cosmic Microwave Background falsifies all geocentric or 'Tychonic/Brahean) systems.

physics.hist-ph↗

Mach's relativity of rotation in light of contemporary physics

Mach argued for a relational rather than an absolute notion of space, insisting that centrifugal forces inside a rotating object such as a bucket can be reproduced by keeping the bucket fixed and rotating the universe. In response to a paper of ours denying the validity of Mach's views, Bhadra and Das elaborate on Mach's position. We address several of their arguments and show that Mach's relational notion of space is wrong-headed. Special and general relativity distinguish between a bucket (i.e. any system) rotating in a fixed universe and a bucket fixed in a rotating universe and between a non-rotating bucket in a non-rotating universe and a co-rotating bucket in a rotating universe, distinctions that go against Mach's relational theory of space. Even when taken on its own terms, Mach's theory can apply only to single point-like buckets rotating at infinitesimal angular velocities.

gr-qc↗

On Mach's critique of Newton and Copernicus

Maintaining the relativity of all motion, especially rotational motion, Mach denied the existence of absolute motion and absolute space. He maintained the equivalence of the Ptolemaic and the Copernican systems and the equivalence of a fixed bucket in a rotating universe with the converse. An analysis of the Foucault pendulum shows that there cannot be a fixed bucket in a rotating universe. Also, Mach's views violate the physics he espoused: non-inertial experiments, e.g. stellar aberration and electromagnetic effects, distinguish between a rotating bucket in a fixed universe and the converse, between the Copernican and the Ptolemaic systems, and establish that one cannot ascribe all observations solely to relative motion between a system and the universe.

astro-ph↗