arXiv subjects

Charlotte Brandebusemeyer

Publications and source records attributed to Charlotte Brandebusemeyer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Developers' Experience with Generative AI Beyond Productivity Assessment -- Insights from an Empirical Mixed-Methods Field Study

With the growing adoption of AI-powered coding assistants, organizations and developers are increasingly seeking to optimize their interaction with these tools. Prior research has largely focused on output quality and productivity gains, with limited attention paid to developers' well-being and interaction experiences. This paper presents a developer-centered empirical mixed-methods study to investigate how professional developers engage with Generative AI (GenAI) in their natural work environment. Controlled data collection sessions are combined with natural work periods. Results show that developers are generally satisfied with GenAI, particularly for monotonous, repetitive, and structured tasks, and report perceived efficiency and productivity gains. Copilot interaction type preferences differ by task type and complexity: While both in-code suggestions and chat-based prompting independently improve task efficiency and reduce perceived workload, combining these interaction types within a single task diminishes benefits. We propose a rule-of-thumb for selecting an interaction type based on task characteristics. During development-heavy tasks, results indicate that perceived cognitive load arises from AI interaction, while perceived productivity depends on AI output quality. Participation in this study positively influenced developers' awareness and intentional use of GenAI tools. These findings demonstrate the value of real-world, mixed-methods study designs to understand GenAI tools and developers' experiences with them.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Developers' Experience with Generative AI -- First Insights from an Empirical Mixed-Methods Field Study

With the rise of AI-powered coding assistants, firms and programmers are exploring how to optimize their interaction with them. Research has so far mainly focused on evaluating output quality and productivity gains, leaving aside the developers' experience during the interaction. In this study, we take a multimodal, developer-centered approach to gain insights into how professional developers experience the interaction with Generative AI (GenAI) in their natural work environment in a firm. The aim of this paper is (1) to demonstrate a feasible mixed-method study design with controlled and uncontrolled study periods within a firm setting, (2) to give first insights from complementary behavioral and subjective experience data on developers' interaction with GitHub Copilot and (3) to compare the impact of interaction types (no Copilot use, in-code suggestions, chat prompts or both in-code suggestions and chat prompts) on efficiency, accuracy and perceived workload whilst working on different task categories. Results of the controlled sessions in this study indicate that moderate use of either in-code suggestions or chat prompts improves efficiency (task duration) and reduces perceived workload compared to not using Copilot, while excessive or combined use lessens these benefits. Accuracy (task completion) profits from chat interaction. In general, subjective perception of workload aligns with objective behavioral data in this study. During the uncontrolled period of the study, both higher cognitive load and productivity were perceived when interacting with AI during everyday working tasks. This study motivates the use of comparable study designs, in e.g. workshop or hackathon settings, to evaluate GenAI tools holistically and realistically with a focus on the developers' experience.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Using CognitIDE to Capture Developers' Cognitive Load via Physiological Activity During Everyday Software Development Tasks

Integrated development environments (IDE) support developers in a variety of tasks. Unobtrusively capturing developers' cognitive load while working on different programming tasks could help optimize developers' work experience, increase their productivity, and positively impact code quality. In this paper, we propose a study in which the IntelliJ-based IDE plugin CognitIDE is used to collect, map, and visualize software developers' physiological activity data while they are working on various software development tasks. In a feasibility study, participants completed four simulated everyday working tasks of software developers - coding, debugging, code documentation, and email writing - based on Java open source code in the IDE whilst their physiological activity was recorded. Between the tasks, the participants' perceived workload was assessed. Feasibility testing showed that CognitIDE could successfully be used for data collection sessions of one hour, which was the most extended duration tested and was well-perceived by those working with it. Furthermore, the recorded physiological activity indicated higher cognitive load during working tasks compared to baseline recordings. This suggests that cognitive load can be assessed, mapped to code positions, visualized, and discussed with participants in such study setups with CognitIDE. These promising results indicate the usefulness of the plugin for diverse study workflows in a natural IDE environment.

cs.SE↗