arXiv subjects

Chenguang Lu

Publications and source records attributed to Chenguang Lu.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

A Semantic Generalization of Shannon's Information Theory and Applications

Does semantic communication require a semantic information theory parallel to Shannon's information theory, or can Shannon's work be generalized for semantic communication? This paper advocates for the latter and introduces a semantic generalization of Shannon's information theory (G theory for short). The core idea is to replace the distortion constraint with the semantic constraint, achieved by utilizing a set of truth functions as a semantic channel. These truth functions enable the expressions of semantic distortion, semantic information measures, and semantic information loss. Notably, the maximum semantic information criterion is equivalent to the maximum likelihood criterion and similar to the Regularized Least Squares criterion. This paper shows G theory's applications to daily and electronic semantic communication, machine learning, constraint control, Bayesian confirmation, portfolio theory, and information value. The improvements in machine learning methods involve multilabel learning and classification, maximum mutual information classification, mixture models, and solving latent variables. Furthermore, insights from statistical physics are discussed: Shannon information is similar to free energy; semantic information to free energy in local equilibrium systems; and information efficiency to the efficiency of free energy in performing work. The paper also proposes refining Friston's minimum free energy principle into the maximum information efficiency principle. Lastly, it compares G theory with other semantic information theories and discusses its limitation in representing the semantics of complex data.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2024

Semantic Information G Theory for Range Control with Tradeoff between Purposiveness and Efficiency

Recent advances in deep learning suggest that we need to maximize and minimize two different kinds of information simultaneously. The Information Max-Min (IMM) method has been used in deep learning, reinforcement learning, and maximum entropy control. Shannon's information rate-distortion function is the theoretical basis of Minimizing Mutual Information (MMI) and data compression, but it is not enough to solve the IMM problem. The author has proposed the semantic information G theory (i.e., Shannon-Lu theory), including the semantic information G measure and the information rate fidelity function R(G) (R is the MMI for the given G of semantic mutual information). The parameter solution of the R(G) function provides a general method to improve the information efficiency, G/R. This paper briefly introduces the semantic information G measure and the parametric solution of the R(G) function. Two examples reveal that the parametric solution can help us optimize range control with the tradeoff between purposiveness (i.e., semantic mutual information) and information efficiency. It seems that the R(G) function can serve as the theoretical basis of IMM methods, but we still need further research in combination with deep learning, reinforcement learning, and constraint control.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2024

Semantic Variational Bayes Based on Semantic Information G Theory for Solving Latent Variables

The Variational Bayesian method (VB) is used to solve the probability distributions of latent variables with the minimum free energy criterion. This criterion is not easy to understand, and the computation is complex. For these reasons, this paper proposes the Semantic Variational Bayes' method (SVB). The Semantic Information Theory the author previously proposed extends the rate-distortion function R(D) to the rate-fidelity function R(G), where R is the minimum mutual information for given semantic mutual information G. SVB came from the parameter solution of R(G), where the variational and iterative methods originated from Shannon et al.'s research on the rate-distortion function. The constraint functions SVB uses include likelihood, truth, membership, similarity, and distortion functions. SVB uses the maximum information efficiency (G/R) criterion, including the maximum semantic information criterion for optimizing model parameters and the minimum mutual information criterion for optimizing the Shannon channel. For the same tasks, SVB is computationally simpler than VB. The computational experiments in the paper include 1) using a mixture model as an example to show that the mixture model converges as G/R increases; 2) demonstrating the application of SVB in data compression with a group of error ranges as the constraint; 3) illustrating how the semantic information measure and SVB can be used for maximum entropy control and reinforcement learning in control tasks with given range constraints, providing numerical evidence for balancing control's purposiveness and efficiency. Further research is needed to apply SVB to neural networks and deep learning.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Reviewing Evolution of Learning Functions and Semantic Information Measures for Understanding Deep Learning

A new trend in deep learning, represented by Mutual Information Neural Estimation (MINE) and Information Noise Contrast Estimation (InfoNCE), is emerging. In this trend, similarity functions and Estimated Mutual Information (EMI) are used as learning and objective functions. Coincidentally, EMI is essentially the same as Semantic Mutual Information (SeMI) proposed by the author 30 years ago. This paper first reviews the evolutionary histories of semantic information measures and learning functions. Then, it briefly introduces the author's semantic information G theory with the rate-fidelity function R(G) (G denotes SeMI, and R(G) extends R(D)) and its applications to multi-label learning, the maximum Mutual Information (MI) classification, and mixture models. Then it discusses how we should understand the relationship between SeMI and Shan-non's MI, two generalized entropies (fuzzy entropy and coverage entropy), Autoencoders, Gibbs distributions, and partition functions from the perspective of the R(G) function or the G theory. An important conclusion is that mixture models and Restricted Boltzmann Machines converge because SeMI is maximized, and Shannon's MI is minimized, making information efficiency G/R close to 1. A potential opportunity is to simplify deep learning by using Gaussian channel mixture models for pre-training deep neural networks' latent layers without considering gradients. It also discusses how the SeMI measure is used as the reward function (reflecting purposiveness) for reinforcement learning. The G theory helps interpret deep learning but is far from enough. Combining semantic information theory and deep learning will accelerate their development.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2023

Causal Confirmation Measures: From Simpson's Paradox to COVID-19

When we compare the influences of two causes on an outcome, if the conclusion from every group is against that from the conflation, we think there is Simpson's Paradox. The Existing Causal Inference Theory (ECIT) can make the overall conclusion consistent with the grouping conclusion by removing the confounder's influence to eliminate the paradox. The ECIT uses relative risk difference Pd = max(0, (R - 1)/R) (R denotes the risk ratio) as the probability of causation. In contrast, Philosopher Fitelson uses confirmation measure D (posterior probability minus prior probability) to measure the strength of causation. Fitelson concludes that from the perspective of Bayesian confirmation, we should directly accept the overall conclusion without considering the paradox. The author proposed a Bayesian confirmation measure b* similar to Pd before. To overcome the contradiction between the ECIT and Bayesian confirmation, the author uses the semantic information method with the minimum cross-entropy criterion to deduce causal confirmation measure Cc = (R -1)/max(R, 1). Cc is like Pd but has normalizing property (between -1 and 1) and cause symmetry. It especially fits cases where a cause restrains an outcome, such as the COVID-19 vaccine controlling the infection. Some examples (about kidney stone treatments and COVID-19) reveal that Pd and Cc are more reasonable than D; Cc is more useful than Pd.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2022

Semantic Information G Theory and Logical Bayesian Inference for Machine Learning

An important problem with machine learning is that when label number n>2, it is very difficult to construct and optimize a group of learning functions, and we wish that optimized learning functions are still useful when prior distribution P(x) (where x is an instance) is changed. To resolve this problem, the semantic information G theory, Logical Bayesian Inference (LBI), and a group of Channel Matching (CM) algorithms together form a systematic solution. A semantic channel in the G theory consists of a group of truth functions or membership functions. In comparison with likelihood functions, Bayesian posteriors, and Logistic functions used by popular methods, membership functions can be more conveniently used as learning functions without the above problem. In Logical Bayesian Inference (LBI), every label's learning is independent. For Multilabel learning, we can directly obtain a group of optimized membership functions from a big enough sample with labels, without preparing different samples for different labels. A group of Channel Matching (CM) algorithms is developed for machine learning. For the Maximum Mutual Information (MMI) classification of three classes with Gaussian distributions on a two-dimensional feature space, 2-3 iterations can make mutual information between three classes and three labels surpass 99% of the MMI for most initial partitions. For mixture models, the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm is improved and becomes the CM-EM algorithm, which can outperform the EM algorithm when mixture ratios are imbalanced, or local convergence exists. The CM iteration algorithm needs to combine neural networks for MMI classifications on high-dimensional feature spaces. LBI needs further studies for the unification of statistics and logic.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2022

How Semantic Information G Measure Relates to Distortion, Freshness, Purposiveness, and Efficiency

To improve communication efficiency and provide more useful information, we need to measure semantic information by combining inaccuracy or distortion, freshness, purposiveness, and efficiency. The author proposed the semantic information G measure before. This measure is more compatible with Shannon information theory than other semantic or generalized information measures and has been applied to machine learning. This paper focuses on semantic predictive information (including observation information) and purposive (or goal-related) information (involving semantic communication and constraint control). The GPS pointer is used as an example to discuss the change of semantic predictive information with inaccuracy and time (age of the information). An example of constraint control (controlling probability distributions) is provided for measuring purposive information and maximizing this information and the information efficiency. The information rate fidelity function (a generalization of the information rate distortion function) is introduced for the optimization. Two computing examples demonstrate how to measure predictive and goal-related information and optimizing information efficiency. The results accord with theoretical conclusions well. The G measure is related to deep learning; its application to machine learning is worth exploring. Communication efficiency also involves utilities or information values; semantic communication optimization combining utilities needs further research.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2021

Using the Semantic Information G Measure to Explain and Extend Rate-Distortion Functions and Maximum Entropy Distributions

In the rate-distortion function and the Maximum Entropy (ME) method, Minimum Mutual In-formation (MMI) distributions and ME distributions are expressed by Bayes-like formulas, in-cluding Negative Exponential Functions (NEFs) and partition functions. Why do these non-probability functions exist in Bayes-like formulas? On the other hand, the rate-distortion function has three disadvantages: (1) the distortion function is subjectively defined; (2) the defi-nition of the distortion function between instances and labels is often difficult; (3) it cannot be used for data compression according to the labels' semantic meanings. The author has proposed using the semantic information G measure with both statistical probability and logical probability before. We can now explain NEFs as truth functions, partition functions as logical probabilities, Bayes-like formulas as semantic Bayes' formulas, MMI as Semantic Mutual Information (SMI), and ME as extreme ME minus SMI. In overcoming the above disadvantages, this paper sets up the relationship between truth functions and distortion functions, obtains truth functions from samples by machine learning, and constructs constraint conditions with truth functions to extend rate-distortion functions. Two examples are used to help readers understand the MMI iteration and to support the theoretical results. Using truth functions and the semantic information G measure, we can combine machine learning and data compression, including semantic com-pression. We need further studies to explore general data compression and recovery, according to the semantic meaning.

cs.IT↗

arXiv2021

Understanding and Accelerating EM Algorithm's Convergence by Fair Competition Principle and Rate-Verisimilitude Function

Why can the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm for mixture models converge? Why can different initial parameters cause various convergence difficulties? The Q-L synchronization theory explains that the observed data log-likelihood L and the complete data log-likelihood Q are positively correlated; we can achieve maximum L by maximizing Q. According to this theory, the Deterministic Annealing EM (DAEM) algorithm's authors make great efforts to eliminate locally maximal Q for avoiding L's local convergence. However, this paper proves that in some cases, Q may and should decrease for L to increase; slow or local convergence exists only because of small samples and unfair competition. This paper uses marriage competition to explain different convergence difficulties and proposes the Fair Competition Principle (FCP) with an initialization map for improving initializations. It uses the rate-verisimilitude function, extended from the rate-distortion function, to explain the convergence of the EM and improved EM algorithms. This convergence proof adopts variational and iterative methods that Shannon et al. used for analyzing rate-distortion functions. The initialization map can vastly save both algorithms' running times for binary Gaussian mixtures. The FCP and the initialization map are useful for complicated mixtures but not sufficient; we need further studies for specific methods.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

The P-T Probability Framework for Semantic Communication, Falsification, Confirmation, and Bayesian Reasoning

Many researchers want to unify probability and logic by defining logical probability or probabilistic logic reasonably. This paper tries to unify statistics and logic so that we can use both statistical probability and logical probability at the same time. For this purpose, this paper proposes the P-T probability framework, which is assembled with Shannon's statistical probability framework for communication, Kolmogorov's probability axioms for logical probability, and Zadeh's membership functions used as truth functions. Two kinds of probabilities are connected by an extended Bayes' theorem, with which we can convert a likelihood function and a truth function from one to another. Hence, we can train truth functions (in logic) by sampling distributions (in statistics). This probability framework was developed in the author's long-term studies on semantic information, statistical learning, and color vision. This paper first proposes the P-T probability framework and explains different probabilities in it by its applications to semantic information theory. Then, this framework and the semantic information methods are applied to statistical learning, statistical mechanics, hypothesis evaluation (including falsification), confirmation, and Bayesian reasoning. Theoretical applications illustrate the reasonability and practicability of this framework. This framework is helpful for interpretable AI. To interpret neural networks, we need further study.

stat.OT↗

arXiv2020

Fair Marriage Principle and Initialization Map for the EM Algorithm

The popular convergence theory of the EM algorithm explains that the observed incomplete data log-likelihood L and the complete data log-likelihood Q are positively correlated, and we can maximize L by maximizing Q. The Deterministic Annealing EM (DAEM) algorithm was hence proposed for avoiding locally maximal Q. This paper provides different conclusions: 1) The popular convergence theory is wrong; 2) The locally maximal Q can affect the convergent speed, but cannot block the global convergence; 3) Like marriage competition, unfair competition between two components may vastly decrease the globally convergent speed; 4) Local convergence exists because the sample is too small, and unfair competition exists; 5) An improved EM algorithm, called the Channel Matching (CM) EM algorithm, can accelerate the global convergence. This paper provides an initialization map with two means as two axes for the example of a binary Gaussian mixture studied by the authors of DAEM algorithm. This map can tell how fast the convergent speeds are for different initial means and why points in some areas are not suitable as initial points. A two-dimensional example indicates that the big sample or the fair initialization can avoid global convergence. For more complicated mixture models, we need further study to convert the fair marriage principle to specific methods for the initializations.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2020

Channels' Confirmation and Predictions' Confirmation: from the Medical Test to the Raven Paradox

After long arguments between positivism and falsificationism, the verification of universal hypotheses was replaced with the confirmation of uncertain major premises. Unfortunately, Hemple discovered the Raven Paradox (RP). Then, Carnap used the logical probability increment as the confirmation measure. So far, many confirmation measures have been proposed. Measure F among them proposed by Kemeny and Oppenheim possesses symmetries and asymmetries proposed by Elles and Fitelson, monotonicity proposed by Greco et al., and normalizing property suggested by many researchers. Based on the semantic information theory, a measure b* similar to F is derived from the medical test. Like the likelihood ratio, b* and F can only indicate the quality of channels or the testing means instead of the quality of probability predictions. And, it is still not easy to use b*, F, or another measure to clarify the RP. For this reason, measure c* similar to the correct rate is derived. The c* has the simple form: (a-c)/max(a, c); it supports the Nicod Criterion and undermines the Equivalence Condition, and hence, can be used to eliminate the RP. Some examples are provided to show why it is difficult to use one of popular confirmation measures to eliminate the RP. Measure F, b*, and c* indicate that fewer counterexamples' existence is more essential than more positive examples' existence, and hence, are compatible with Popper's falsification thought.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2020

Downlink Fronthaul Compression in Frequency Domain using OpenAirInterface

This paper presents a compression scheme developed for the transport of downlink radio signals in packet fronthaul of centralized-radio access networks (C-RAN). The technique is tailored to frequency-domain functional splits, in which inactive LTE (or 5G NR) resource elements may not be transmitted in the packets. This allows decreasing the link data rate, especially when the cell load is low. The compression scheme is based on two parts: transmission of side information to indicate active and inactive resource elements of the LTE, and nonuniform scalar quantization to compress the QAM symbols of the active resource elements. The method was implemented in the OpenAirInterface (OAI) software for real-time evaluation. The testbed results show a significant reduction in link usage with a low computational cost.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2019

The CM Algorithm for the Maximum Mutual Information Classifications of Unseen Instances

The Maximum Mutual Information (MMI) criterion is different from the Least Error Rate (LER) criterion. It can reduce failing to report small probability events. This paper introduces the Channels Matching (CM) algorithm for the MMI classifications of unseen instances. It also introduces some semantic information methods, which base the CM algorithm. In the CM algorithm, label learning is to let the semantic channel match the Shannon channel (Matching I) whereas classifying is to let the Shannon channel match the semantic channel (Matching II). We can achieve the MMI classifications by repeating Matching I and II. For low-dimensional feature spaces, we only use parameters to construct n likelihood functions for n different classes (rather than to construct partitioning boundaries as gradient descent) and expresses the boundaries by numerical values. Without searching in parameter spaces, the computation of the CM algorithm for low-dimensional feature spaces is very simple and fast. Using a two-dimensional example, we test the speed and reliability of the CM algorithm by different initial partitions. For most initial partitions, two iterations can make the mutual information surpass 99% of the convergent MMI. The analysis indicates that for high-dimensional feature spaces, we may combine the CM algorithm with neural networks to improve the MMI classifications for faster and more reliable convergence.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

From the EM Algorithm to the CM-EM Algorithm for Global Convergence of Mixture Models

The Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm for mixture models often results in slow or invalid convergence. The popular convergence proof affirms that the likelihood increases with Q; Q is increasing in the M -step and non-decreasing in the E-step. The author found that (1) Q may and should decrease in some E-steps; (2) The Shannon channel from the E-step is improper and hence the expectation is improper. The author proposed the CM-EM algorithm (CM means Channel's Matching), which adds a step to optimize the mixture ratios for the proper Shannon channel and maximizes G, average log-normalized-likelihood, in the M-step. Neal and Hinton's Maximization-Maximization (MM) algorithm use F instead of Q to speed the convergence. Maximizing G is similar to maximizing F. The new convergence proof is similar to Beal's proof with the variational method. It first proves that the minimum relative entropy equals the minimum R-G (R is mutual information), then uses variational and iterative methods that Shannon et al. use for rate-distortion functions to prove the global convergence. Some examples show that Q and F should and may decrease in some E-steps. For the same example, the EM, MM, and CM-EM algorithms need about 36, 18, and 9 iterations respectively.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Semantic Channel and Shannon's Channel Mutually Match for Multi-Label Classification

A group of transition probability functions form a Shannon's channel whereas a group of truth functions form a semantic channel. Label learning is to let semantic channels match Shannon's channels and label selection is to let Shannon's channels match semantic channels. The Channel Matching (CM) algorithm is provided for multi-label classification. This algorithm adheres to maximum semantic information criterion which is compatible with maximum likelihood criterion and regularized least squares criterion. If samples are very large, we can directly convert Shannon's channels into semantic channels by the third kind of Bayes' theorem; otherwise, we can train truth functions with parameters by sampling distributions. A label may be a Boolean function of some atomic labels. For simplifying learning, we may only obtain the truth functions of some atomic label. For a given label, instances are divided into three kinds (positive, negative, and unclear) instead of two kinds as in popular studies so that the problem with binary relevance is avoided. For each instance, the classifier selects a compound label with most semantic information or richest connotation. As a predictive model, the semantic channel does not change with the prior probability distribution (source) of instances. It still works when the source is changed. The classifier changes with the source, and hence can overcome class-imbalance problem. It is shown that the old population's increasing will change the classifier for label "Old" and has been impelling the semantic evolution of "Old". The CM iteration algorithm for unseen instance classification is introduced.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

From Shannon's Channel to Semantic Channel via New Bayes' Formulas for Machine Learning

A group of transition probability functions form a Shannon's channel whereas a group of truth functions form a semantic channel. By the third kind of Bayes' theorem, we can directly convert a Shannon's channel into an optimized semantic channel. When a sample is not big enough, we can use a truth function with parameters to produce the likelihood function, then train the truth function by the conditional sampling distribution. The third kind of Bayes' theorem is proved. A semantic information theory is simply introduced. The semantic information measure reflects Popper's hypothesis-testing thought. The Semantic Information Method (SIM) adheres to maximum semantic information criterion which is compatible with maximum likelihood criterion and Regularized Least Squares criterion. It supports Wittgenstein's view: the meaning of a word lies in its use. Letting the two channels mutually match, we obtain the Channels' Matching (CM) algorithm for machine learning. The CM algorithm is used to explain the evolution of the semantic meaning of natural language, such as "Old age". The semantic channel for medical tests and the confirmation measures of test-positive and test-negative are discussed. The applications of the CM algorithm to semi-supervised learning and non-supervised learning are simply introduced. As a predictive model, the semantic channel fits variable sources and hence can overcome class-imbalance problem. The SIM strictly distinguishes statistical probability and logical probability and uses both at the same time. This method is compatible with the thoughts of Bayes, Fisher, Shannon, Zadeh, Tarski, Davidson, Wittgenstein, and Popper.It is a competitive alternative to Bayesian inference.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2017

The Semantic Information Method for Maximum Mutual Information and Maximum Likelihood of Tests, Estimations, and Mixture Models

It is very difficult to solve the Maximum Mutual Information (MMI) or Maximum Likelihood (ML) for all possible Shannon Channels or uncertain rules of choosing hypotheses, so that we have to use iterative methods. According to the Semantic Mutual Information (SMI) and R(G) function proposed by Chenguang Lu (1993) (where R(G) is an extension of information rate distortion function R(D), and G is the lower limit of the SMI), we can obtain a new iterative algorithm of solving the MMI and ML for tests, estimations, and mixture models. The SMI is defined by the average log normalized likelihood. The likelihood function is produced from the truth function and the prior by semantic Bayesian inference. A group of truth functions constitute a semantic channel. Letting the semantic channel and Shannon channel mutually match and iterate, we can obtain the Shannon channel that maximizes the Shannon mutual information and the average log likelihood. This iterative algorithm is called Channels' Matching algorithm or the CM algorithm. The convergence can be intuitively explained and proved by the R(G) function. Several iterative examples for tests, estimations, and mixture models show that the computation of the CM algorithm is simple (which can be demonstrated in excel files). For most random examples, the numbers of iterations for convergence are close to 5. For mixture models, the CM algorithm is similar to the EM algorithm; however, the CM algorithm has better convergence and more potential applications in comparison with the standard EM algorithm.

cs.IT↗