arXiv subjects

Chenyu Zuo

Publications and source records attributed to Chenyu Zuo.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Reconfiguring Geovisualization in the Age of Generative AI: Insights from Domain Experts

GenAI is increasingly integrated into geovisualization, yet its broader implications for professional practice are insufficiently understood. To examine these implications, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 geovisualization experts. The interviews were structured around four broad analytical domains: Data, Ideation, Prototyping, and Iteration, while also encouraging participants to reflect on issues that extend beyond these activities. Our findings show that GenAI expands the capabilities of geovisualization, particularly in terms of data handling, creative exploration, and rapid prototyping, but does not simply remove existing constraints. Instead, key bottlenecks are shifting from production to judgment and verification. As routine technical tasks become more automated, professional value increasingly depends on spatial reasoning, contextual interpretation, aesthetic and ethical judgment, and the ability to assess whether AI-generated outputs are appropriate for use. At the same time, GenAI introduces new challenges regarding provenance, interpretability, and accountability, raising questions about how responsibility should be distributed across models, developers, practitioners, institutions, and users. These shifts are particularly significant in geovisualization because spatial representations are constrained by geographic reality and must balance scientific validity, visual expression, and technical implementation. We therefore argue that responsible GenAI in geovisualization requires domain-specific approaches to spatial validation, provenance, uncertainty communication, human oversight, and accountable use. This study provides an expert-grounded perspective on how GenAI is reconfiguring geovisualization as a practice of spatial knowledge production. It also identifies implications for future professional practice, education, system design, and governance.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Red Light, Grey Zone: A Multi-Perspective Interactive Narrative for Autonomous Driving Ethics

Autonomous driving ethics is not only an expert concern, but also a public issue involving risk, responsibility, and governance. However, non-experts often struggle to interpret these issues in concrete incidents, especially when responsibility is distributed across multiple stakeholders. This paper investigates interactive narrative as a public-facing method for eliciting situated ethical reflection on autonomous driving. We present Red Light, Grey Zone, a web-based, multi-perspective interactive narrative prototype inspired by a real-world autonomous-driving incident. The prototype invites participants to compare stakeholder perspectives, examine scene materials, and make responsibility judgments in the face of ethical ambiguity. We report an exploratory user study (N=12) examining how differently non-experts responded to the prototype. Our analysis focuses on three dimensions of reflection: ethical cognition, responsibility-focused critical thinking, and multi-perspective reasoning. Exploratory pre-post results showed the strongest self-reported shift in responsibility-focused critical thinking among participants who completed the intended stakeholder-comparison process, while ethical cognition and multi-perspective reasoning showed positive directional trends. Qualitative findings further show how participants reflected on safety and market trade-offs, responsibility ambiguity, transparency and privacy, and governance gaps. Participants also used stakeholder comparison to corroborate evidence and, in many cases, broaden responsibility judgments from single-actor blame toward more distributed interpretations of accountability. Overall, the study suggests that multi-perspective interactive narratives may support non-expert reflection on accountability, evidence, and governance in AI-enabled systems.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Inclusive Learning Analytics with Embedded Data Comics: A Conceptual Framework for Public Understanding of AI Ethics

Public awareness of AI ethics plays a crucial role in fostering the responsible and sustainable development of AI technology. However, finding effective ways to promote public understanding of the ethical risks of AI remains a challenge. Given the complexity of AI ethical issues and the cognitive limitations of the public, this review paper proposes a conceptual framework for inclusive learning analytics with embedded data comics. Data comics help transform complex and abstract AI ethics cases into compelling and relatable stories, fostering public empathy and introspection. More importantly, inclusive learning analytics targets not only people of different demographic attributes, but also different mindsets with inherent cognitive biases. By providing equal and easily accessible channels for AI ethics issues, we aim to encourage the public to reflect on AI ethics incidents from multiple perspectives and develop the habit of continuous learning to adapt to evolving AI technologies and ethical risks.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Constructing AI ethics narratives based on real-world data: Human-AI collaboration in data-driven visual storytelling

AI ethics narratives have the potential to shape the public accurate understanding of AI technologies and promote communication among different stakeholders. However, AI ethics narratives are largely lacking. Existing limited narratives tend to center on works of science fiction or corporate marketing campaigns of large technology companies. Misuse of "socio-technical imaginary" can blur the line between speculation and reality for the public, undermining the responsibility and regulation of technology development. Therefore, constructing authentic AI ethics narratives is an urgent task. The emergence of generative AI offers new possibilities for building narrative systems. This study is dedicated to data-driven visual storytelling about AI ethics relying on the human-AI collaboration. Based on the five key elements of story models, we proposed a conceptual framework for human-AI collaboration, explored the roles of generative AI and humans in the creation of visual stories. We implemented the conceptual framework in a real AI news case. This research leveraged advanced generative AI technologies to provide a reference for constructing genuine AI ethics narratives. Our goal is to promote active public engagement and discussions through authentic AI ethics narratives, thereby contributing to the development of better AI policies.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Mapping AI Ethics Narratives: Evidence from Twitter Discourse Between 2015 and 2022

Public participation is indispensable for an insightful understanding of the ethics issues raised by AI technologies. Twitter is selected in this paper to serve as an online public sphere for exploring discourse on AI ethics, facilitating broad and equitable public engagement in the development of AI technology. A research framework is proposed to demonstrate how to transform AI ethics-related discourse on Twitter into coherent and readable narratives. It consists of two parts: 1) combining neural networks with large language models to construct a topic hierarchy that contains popular topics of public concern without ignoring small but important voices, thus allowing a fine-grained exploration of meaningful information. 2) transforming fragmented and difficult-to-understand social media information into coherent and easy-to-read stories through narrative visualization, providing a new perspective for understanding the information in Twitter data. This paper aims to advocate for policy makers to enhance public oversight of AI technologies so as to promote their fair and sustainable development.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2022

Avoiding the Great Filter: A Simulation of Important Factors for Human Survival

Humanity's path to avoiding extinction is a daunting and inevitable challenge which proves difficult to solve, partially due to the lack of data and evidence surrounding the concept. We aim to address this confusion by addressing the most dangerous threats to humanity, in hopes of providing a direction to approach this problem. Using a probabilistic model, we observed the effects of nuclear war, climate change, asteroid impacts, artificial intelligence and pandemics, which are the most harmful disasters in terms of their extent of destruction on the length of human survival. We consider the starting point of the predicted average number of survival years as the present calendar year. Nuclear war, when sampling from an artificial normal distribution, results in an average human survival time of 60 years into the future starting from the present, before a civilization-ending disaster. While climate change results in an average human survival time of 193 years, the simulation based on impact from asteroids results in an average of 1754 years. Since the risks from asteroid impacts could be considered to reside mostly in the far future, it can be concluded that nuclear war, climate change, and pandemics are presently the most prominent threats to humanity. Additionally, the danger from superiority of artificial intelligence over humans, although still somewhat abstract, is worthy of further study as its potential for impeding humankind's progress towards becoming a more advanced civilization cannot be confidently dismissed.

physics.soc-ph↗