SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Christophe Lesimple

Publications and source records attributed to Christophe Lesimple.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of HRTF Augmentation on Predicted Spatial Release from Masking in Music

Separating individual musical instruments within a complex mixture of sounds poses a persistent challenge for listeners with hearing loss. Although spatial separation of sources improves speech recognition in this population, the potential benefits of spatial cue enhancement for music perception remain largely unexplored. This paper introduces a method to increase spatial cue salience through the augmentation of individual head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). Auditory model analyses indicate that augmented HRTFs may enhance the separability of musical instruments relative to individual HRTFs. Predicted benefits persist when moderate sensorineural hearing loss is modelled, though they are substantially reduced. Simulated hearing aid processing does not restore these benefits to normal-hearing levels.

eess.AS

Data Standards in Audiology: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Community Perspectives and Implementation Considerations

Objective: This study addresses conceptual issues around data standardisation in audiology, and outlines steps toward achieving it. It reports a survey of the computational audiology community on their current understanding, needs, and preferences concerning data standards. Based on survey findings and a panel discussion, recommendations are made concerning moving forward with standardisation in audiology. Design: Mixed-methods: 1) review of existing standardisation efforts; 2) a survey of the computational audiology community; 3) expert panel discussion in a dedicated session at the 2024 Virtual Conference of Computational Audiology. Sample: Survey: 82 members of the global community; Panel discussion: five experts. Results: A prerequisite for any global audiology database are agreed data standards. Although many are familiar with the general idea, few know of existing initiatives, or have actively participated in them. Ninety percent of respondents expressed willingness to follow or contribute to standardisation efforts. The panel discussed relevant initiatives (e.g. OMOP, openEHR, Noah) and explored both challenges (around harmonisation) and opportunities (alignment with other medical fields and conversion among approaches). Conclusions: Combining conceptual discussion with stakeholder views, the study offers guidance for implementing interoperable data standards in audiology. It highlights community support, key issues to address, and suggests paths for future work.

cs.SD