arXiv subjects

Christopher M. Danforth

Publications and source records attributed to Christopher M. Danforth.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Archetypometrics of 'Friends'

Storytelling inherently revolves around characters. Using the television sitcom `Friends' as a case study, we investigate how well archetype vectors capture both individual characterization and the relational structure of a specific ensemble. Our work is based on the archetypometrics framework, which locates 2,000 fictional characters from 341 stories in a continuous space derived from 464 bipolar traits. We proceed in three stages: interpreting each character's archetypal profile against narrative evidence, projecting the ensemble onto ousiograms of the six essential dimensions, and measuring pairwise similarity with vector inner products. We show that the six characters of `Friends' occupy distinct archetypal positions that accord with their established identities, while the projections expose ensemble structure invisible in individual profiles, including the collapse of the Angel--Demon dimension, a signature of the sitcom's uniformly sympathetic cast. Based on inner products, we construct a similarity matrix that resolves three main kinds of relational structure: alignment (e.g., Phoebe--Joey), contrast (e.g., Phoebe--Ross), and orthogonality (e.g., Rachel--Ross and Monica--Chandler). The orthogonality of the romantic pairings affords a detailed view of relationships built on complementary rather than overlapping character traits. Overall, our case study suggests that for ensemble-based stories the archetypometric geometry is fully interpretable in narrative terms, from individual identities to the structure of the group's relationships.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2026

The triumphs and tragedies of fandom: Emotional arcs in NFL tweets

Online fandom communities influence public opinion toward movies, musicians, and sports teams. Using a corpus of game-referencing tweets, we measure variation in sentiment toward National Football League (NFL) teams driven by geography, game outcomes, and team performance for the 2011--2014 NFL seasons. We estimate a fandom radius for each team, identifying regions where engagement exceeds background levels of discussion. We find sentiment for both winning and losing teams is positive immediately prior to games, drops at kickoff, and rebounds slightly during halftime. After halftime however, the trajectories diverge: Sentiment for winning teams increases toward the end of the game, while sentiment for losing teams remains low, though both end up below their start of game levels. Finally, a comparison between sentiment and win percentage reveals a weak positive relationship, suggesting that while team success contributes to fandom happiness, other factors also influence how fans discuss the NFL on social media. Our work contributes to a growing body of computational social science research that quantifies the many aspects of modern fandom.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Stop using Media Bias/Fact Check in research

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) purports to quantify the bias, credibility, and factuality of reporting for roughly 10,000 media sources, and the resulting data is commonly used in misinformation research. In the present study, we show that MBFC's methodology does not meet basic standards of rigor for academic research. Despite its widespread prevalence, studies using MBFC rarely examine it carefully, often describing it in ways that contradict its ``About'' page, or treating it as authoritative despite MBFC's disclaimer that it is ``not a tested scientific method... [but] a simple guide to the idea of a source's bias.'' We identified no papers that adequately describe MBFC as the opinions of a single person or critically engage with its methodology in order to justify proceeding with its use. We argue that MBFC's data is not neutral or accurate, but a computationally legible account of hegemony, a specious dataset for uncritical research that mistakes the familiarity of the concepts it quantifies with accuracy. Our study concludes with a call for academic researchers to stop using MBFC. MBFC's data quantifies the results of political processes, including campaigns to discredit the press, and presents them as simple facts about the world, thus reproducing the crisis misinformation scholarship exists to address.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2026

The queer Hero versus the Fool bias of the queer trait: An archetypometric analysis of the collective portrayal of queerness in fictional stories

Visibility in media is pivotal for identity development and for broadening societal views of gender and sexuality. Queer representation has increased in recent years, yet damaging stereotypes and tropes persist. Here, we focus on queer portrayal and its perception by audiences in fictional stories (television, film, and literature) by studying characters by their quantified archetypes which are operationalizations of common conceptions such as Hero, Diva, and Outcast. We use the archetypometrics and Fandom's LGBTQIA+ datasets to study samples of fictional characters along the trait differential spanning straight to queer. We find, quantify, and explain a seeming paradox. The characters with the highest queer score present positive primary archetypes and are typically Heroes rather than Fools, Angels rather than Demons, and Adventurers rather than Traditionalists. But evaluation across many stories for the straight-queer trait itself reveals a strong collective-writing bias towards Fool (away from Hero) and no meaningful loading for the other two dimensions. Our analysis offers a population-scale view of the complexities of queer portrayal, while also pointing to risks in blindly training on many-authored story corpora.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Buffy versus Bella: An archetypometric analysis and comparison

Fictional stories and characters embody and encode social norms, and their study is a powerful tool through which to understand culture and society. Vampire stories and folklore, in particular, have long both reflected and refracted people's preoccupation with disease, sexuality, death, and immortality. Here, we explore female main characters from two popular vampire franchises of the 21st century: Buffy Summers from the eponymous Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Bella Swan from the Twilight series. We employ the archetypometrics framework, built from 2,000 characters assesed across 464 semantic differential traits, to understand Buffy's and Bella's archetypes compared to one another and characters in their own stories, as well as within a larger societal context. While Buffy and Bella are female protagonists who share focus on love and romance, they differ broadly on their underlying traits and overall archetypes. Buffy -- presented as a prototypical high school cheerleader -- largely bucks traditional gender norms as an strong Adventurer-Hero. Bella -- stylized as ``not like the other girls'' -- largely conforms to traditional gender norms as a weak Outcast archetype. In each instance, our use of archetypometrics offers a detailed, character-based lens for assessing female protagonists in contemporary vampire narratives, with clear potential for broader application across other storytelling forms.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Narrative Structure in Tropes: A Computational Analysis of `Friends'

Tropes are recurring narrative devices in television and film. We carry out a computational analysis of tropes in the sitcom Friends, using human-curated trope annotations from TVTropes, episode transcripts, and IMDb ratings. Because automatic trope detection remains challenging, we treat existing trope annotations as a curated analytical layer and focus on their downstream narrative and semantic functions. We first examine the relationship between episode-level trope frequency and audience reception. We find a statistically significant positive association between trope count and weighted IMDb ratings, although the modest explanatory power suggests that more than trope density alone explains audience evaluation. We then connect trope annotations to dialogue transcripts and represent trope-related dialogue using TF-IDF-based semantic features. Using PCA and k-means clustering, we group 1,954 distinct tropes into 15 semantically interpretable clusters. Chi-square analyses show that the six main characters are unevenly distributed across these clusters, with character-specific trope profiles that are broadly consistent with their established narrative identities. Finally, we project trope clusters into the ousiometric power-danger space to examine their semantic organization. The results show that "Physical and Sexual Comedy" occupies a region associated with relatively high danger, while "Revelation, Surprise, and Reaction" occupies a region associated with relatively high power. Overall, our work demonstrates a way to operationalize trope measurement and shows that identifiable trope clusters can provide holistic "distant reading" descriptions of characters and stories.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2026

Gender Disparities in LLM-Based Intimate Partner Violence Detection

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is a major public health concern, and large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for support and information-seeking in sensitive domains. We examine whether LLMs perceive relationship abuse differently depending on victim--perpetrator gender configuration. Using 475 Reddit posts from r/relationship\_advice, we generate counterfactual variants by swapping gendered identifiers to create four dyads: female--female (F/F), female--male (F/M), male--female (M/F), and male--male (M/M), where the first position denotes the victim. Four recent LLMs (GPT-5o, Gemini 3, Llama 4, and Grok 3) evaluate each variant using a structured questionnaire covering IPV, perpetrator intent, cheating, and abuse subtypes. Results show substantial variation across models and dyads. Abuse and intent detection systematically decrease in mixed-gender dyads where the victim is male, with female perpetrator identity emerging as a consistent negative predictor of abuse recognition. Mixed-effects logistic regression confirms that gender roles significantly shape model outputs. Our findings suggest that LLMs reproduce gendered biases from online training data, with implications for support-related deployment. Code and resources are available at https://github.com/TabiaTanzin/Gender-Disparities-in-LLM-Based-Intimate-Partner-Violence-Detection.git.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

False memories to fake news: The evolution of the term "misinformation" in academic literature

Since 2016, the term "misinformation" has become associated with a scientific paradigm that studies, at its core, people making, reading, and sharing false statements, usually on social media, and often warning of the harm to society resulting from the sum of many such events. By tracking the term through the academic literature, with special focus on the years 2011--2023, we connect the post-2016 paradigm with a strand of research dating to the Satanic panic of the 1980s. We argue that post-2016 misinformation research owes more to this intellectual lineage than is generally acknowledged, and we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of this connection. We conclude by drawing parallels between the Satanic panic and 2026, and, similarly, between misinformation research then and now.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2026

Archetypes and gender in fiction: A data-driven mapping of gender stereotypes in stories

Fictional character representations reflect social norms and biases. For example, women are relatively underrepresented in television and film, irrespective of genre, and are frequently stereotyped in these media. Here, we draw on a data-driven operationalization of archetypes -- archetypometrics -- to explore the characterization of 2,000 canonically male and female characters. From an overall space of six pairs of base archetypes, we find that canonically female characters tend more toward Hero, Adventurer, Diva, and Sophisticate archetypes, while male characters, tend toward Fool, Traditionalist, Outcast, Brute and Outcast types. However, overarching patterns by gender nevertheless sustain traditional stereotypes: The seemingly positive heroic bias toward females is undercut by heroic female characters being more masculine than other female characters. We discuss the societal implications of skewed archetype representation by character gender.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Identifying Body Composition Measures That Correlate with Self-Compassion and Social Support

This study explores the relationship between body composition metrics, self-compassion, and social support among college students. Using seasonal body composition data from the InBody770 system and psychometric measures from the Lived Experiences Measured Using Rings Study (LEMURS) (n=156; freshmen=66, sophomores=90), Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) reveals body composition metrics exhibit moderate correlation with self-compassion and social support. Certain physiological and psychological features showed strong and consistent relationships with well-being across the academic year. Trunk and leg impedance stood out as key physiological indicators, while mindfulness, over-identification, affectionate support, and tangible support emerged as recurring psychological and social correlates. This demonstrates that body composition metrics can serve as valuable biomarkers for indicating self-perceived psychosocial well-being, offering insights for future research on scalable mental health modeling and intervention strategies.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Statistical laws and linguistics differ in naturalistic video and fictional conversations

Conversation is a cornerstone of social connection and is linked to well-being outcomes. Conversations vary widely in type with some portion generating complex, dynamic stories. One approach to studying how conversations unfold in time is through statistical patterns such as Heaps' law, which holds that vocabulary size scales with document length. Little work on Heaps' law has looked at conversation and considered how language features impact scaling. We measure Heaps' law for conversations recorded in two distinct mediums: 1. Strangers brought together on video chat and 2. Fictional characters in movies. We find that scaling of vocabulary size differs by parts of speech, suggesting a less efficient purpose in communication by medium.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Us-vs-Them bias in Large Language Models

This study investigates ``us versus them'' bias, as described by Social Identity Theory, in large language models (LLMs) under both default and persona-conditioned settings across multiple architectures (GPT-4.1, DeepSeek-3.1, Gemma-2.0, Grok-3.0, and LLaMA-3.1). Using sentiment dynamics, allotaxonometry, and embedding regression, we find consistent ingroup-positive and outgroup-negative associations across foundational LLMs. We find that adopting a persona systematically alters models' evaluative and affiliative language patterns. For the exemplar personas examined, conservative personas exhibit greater outgroup hostility, whereas liberal personas display stronger ingroup solidarity. Persona conditioning produces distinct clustering in embedding space and measurable semantic divergence, supporting the view that even abstract identity cues can shift models' linguistic behavior. Furthermore, outgroup-targeted prompts increased hostility bias by 1.19--21.76\% across models. These findings suggest that LLMs learn not only factual associations about social groups but also internalize and reproduce distinct ways of being, including attitudes, worldviews, and cognitive styles that are activated when enacting personas. We interpret these results as evidence of a multi-scale coupling between local context (e.g., the persona prompt), localizable representations (what the model ``knows''), and global cognitive tendencies (how it ``thinks''), which are at least reflected in the training data. Finally, we demonstrate ION, an ``us versus them'' bias mitigation approach using fine-tuning and direct preference optimization (DPO), which reduces sentiment divergence by up to 69\%, highlighting the potential for targeted mitigation strategies in future LLM development.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Misalignment of LLM-Generated Personas with Human Perceptions in Low-Resource Settings

Recent advances enable Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate AI personas, yet their lack of deep contextual, cultural, and emotional understanding poses a significant limitation. This study quantitatively compared human responses with those of eight LLM-generated social personas (e.g., Male, Female, Muslim, Political Supporter) within a low-resource environment like Bangladesh, using culturally specific questions. Results show human responses significantly outperform all LLMs in answering questions, and across all matrices of persona perception, with particularly large gaps in empathy and credibility. Furthermore, LLM-generated content exhibited a systematic bias along the lines of the ``Pollyanna Principle'', scoring measurably higher in positive sentiment ($\Phi_{avg} = 5.99$ for LLMs vs. $5.60$ for Humans). These findings suggest that LLM personas do not accurately reflect the authentic experience of real people in resource-scarce environments. It is essential to validate LLM personas against real-world human data to ensure their alignment and reliability before deploying them in social science research.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

LLMs for Low-Resource Dialect Translation Using Context-Aware Prompting: A Case Study on Sylheti

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong translation abilities through prompting, even without task-specific training. However, their effectiveness in dialectal and low-resource contexts remains underexplored. This study presents the first systematic investigation of LLM-based machine translation (MT) for Sylheti, a dialect of Bangla that is itself low-resource. We evaluate five advanced LLMs (GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1, LLaMA 4, Grok 3, and DeepSeek V3.2) across both translation directions (Bangla $\Leftrightarrow$ Sylheti), and find that these models struggle with dialect-specific vocabulary. To address this, we introduce Sylheti-CAP (Context-Aware Prompting), a three-step framework that embeds a linguistic rulebook, a dictionary (2{,}260 core vocabulary items and idioms), and an authenticity check directly into prompts. Extensive experiments show that Sylheti-CAP consistently improves translation quality across models and prompting strategies. Both automatic metrics and human evaluations confirm its effectiveness, while qualitative analysis reveals notable reductions in hallucinations, ambiguities, and awkward phrasing, establishing Sylheti-CAP as a scalable solution for dialectal and low-resource MT. Dataset link: \href{https://github.com/TabiaTanzin/LLMs-for-Low-Resource-Dialect-Translation-Using-Context-Aware-Prompting-A-Case-Study-on-Sylheti.git}{https://github.com/TabiaTanzin/LLMs-for-Low-Resource-Dialect-Translation-Using-Context-Aware-Prompting-A-Case-Study-on-Sylheti.git}

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Detecting sub-populations in online health communities: A mixed-methods exploration of breastfeeding messages in BabyCenter Birth Clubs

Parental stress is a nationwide health crisis according to the U.S. Surgeon General's 2024 advisory. To allay stress, expecting parents seek advice and share experiences in a variety of venues, from in-person birth education classes and parenting groups to virtual communities, for example, BabyCenter, a moderated online forum community with over 4 million members in the United States alone. In this study, we aim to understand how parents talk about pregnancy, birth, and parenting by analyzing 5.43M posts and comments from the April 2017--January 2024 cohort of 331,843 BabyCenter "birth club" users (that is, users who participate in due date forums or "birth clubs" based on their babies' due dates). Using BERTopic to locate breastfeeding threads and LDA to summarize themes, we compare documents in breastfeeding threads to all other birth-club content. Analyzing time series of word rank, we find that posts and comments containing anxiety-related terms increased steadily from April 2017 to January 2024. We used an ensemble of topic models to identify dominant breastfeeding topics within birth clubs, and then explored trends among all user content versus those who posted in threads related to breastfeeding topics. We conducted Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling to identify the most common topics in the full population, as well as within the subset breastfeeding population. We find that the topic of sleep dominates in content generated by the breastfeeding population, as well anxiety-related and work/daycare topics that are not predominant in the full BabyCenter birth club dataset.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2025

Story and essential meaning dynamics in Bangladesh's July 2024 Student-People's Uprising

News media serves a crucial role in disseminating information and shaping public perception, especially during periods of political unrest. Using over 50,0000 YouTube comments on news coverage from July 16 to August 6, 2024, we investigate the emotional dynamics and evolving discourse of public perception during the July 2024 Student-People's Uprising in Bangladesh. Through integrated analyses of sentiment, emotion, topic, lexical discourse, timeline progression, sentiment shifts, and allotaxonometry, we show how negative sentiment dominated during the movement. We find a negative correlation between comment happiness and number of protest deaths $(r = -0.45,\p = 0.00)$. Using an ousiometer to measure essential meaning, we find public responses reflect a landscape of power, aggression, and danger, alongside persistent expressions of hope, moral conviction, and empowerment through goodnesses. Topic discourse progressed during the movement, with peaks in `Political Conflict', `Media Flow', and `Student Violence' during crisis surges, while topics like `Social Resistance' and `Digital Movement' persisted amid repression. Sentiment shifts reveal that after the second internet blackout, average happiness increased, driven by the more frequent use of positive words such as `victory', `peace' and `freedom' and a decrease in negative terms such as `death' and `lies'. Finally, through allotaxonometric analysis, we observe a clear shift from protest to justice.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

BanglaMATH : A Bangla benchmark dataset for testing LLM mathematical reasoning at grades 6, 7, and 8

Large Language Models (LLMs) have tremendous potential to play a key role in supporting mathematical reasoning, with growing use in education and AI research. However, most existing benchmarks are limited to English, creating a significant gap for low-resource languages. For example, Bangla is spoken by nearly 250 million people who would collectively benefit from LLMs capable of native fluency. To address this, we present BanglaMATH, a dataset of 1.7k Bangla math word problems across topics such as Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry, and Logical Reasoning, sourced from Bangla elementary school workbooks and annotated with details like grade level and number of reasoning steps. We have designed BanglaMATH to evaluate the mathematical capabilities of both commercial and open-source LLMs in Bangla, and we find that Gemini 2.5 Flash and DeepSeek V3 are the only models to achieve strong performance, with $\ge$ 80\% accuracy across three elementary school grades. Furthermore, we assess the robustness and language bias of these top-performing LLMs by augmenting the original problems with distracting information, and translating the problems into English. We show that both LLMs fail to maintain robustness and exhibit significant performance bias in Bangla. Our study underlines current limitations of LLMs in handling arithmetic and mathematical reasoning in low-resource languages, and highlights the need for further research on multilingual and equitable mathematical understanding. Dataset link: \href{https://github.com/TabiaTanzin/BanglaMATH-A-Bangla-benchmark-dataset-for-testing-LLM-mathematical-reasoning-at-grades-6-7-and-8.git}{https://github.com/BanglaMATH}

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Sensitivity analysis of epidemic forecasting and spreading on networks with probability generating functions

Epidemic forecasting tools embrace the stochasticity and heterogeneity of disease spread to predict the growth and size of outbreaks. Conceptually, stochasticity and heterogeneity are often modeled as branching processes or as percolation on contact networks. Mathematically, probability generating functions provide a flexible and efficient tool to describe these models and quickly produce forecasts. While their predictions are probabilistic-i.e., distributions of outcome-they depend deterministically on the input distribution of transmission statistics and/or contact structure. Since these inputs can be noisy data or models of high dimension, traditional sensitivity analyses are computationally prohibitive and are therefore rarely used. Here, we use statistical condition estimation to measure the sensitivity of stochastic polynomials representing noisy generating functions. In doing so, we can separate the stochasticity of their forecasts from potential noise in their input. For standard epidemic models, we find that predictions are most sensitive at the critical epidemic threshold (basic reproduction number $R_0 = 1$) only if the transmission is sufficiently homogeneous (dispersion parameter $k > 0.3$). Surprisingly, in heterogeneous systems ($k \leq 0.3$), the sensitivity is highest for values of $R_{0} > 1$. We expect our methods will improve the transparency and applicability of the growing utility of probability generating functions as epidemic forecasting tools.

q-bio.PE↗