Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Christopher T. Schwanen

Publications and source records attributed to Christopher T. Schwanen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Computational Complexity of Alignments

In process mining, alignments quantify the degree of deviation between an observed event trace and a business process model and constitute one of the most important conformance checking techniques. We study the algorithmic complexity of computing alignments over important classes of Petri nets. First, we show that the alignment problem is PSPACE-complete on the class of safe Petri nets and also on the class of safe and sound workflow nets. For live, bounded, free-choice systems, we prove the existence of optimal alignments of polynomial length which positions the alignment problem in NP for this class. We further show that computing alignments is NP-complete even on basic subclasses such as process trees and T-systems. We establish NP-completeness on several related classes as well, including acyclic systems. Finally, we demonstrate that on S-systems, the complexity of the alignment problem even depends on the number of tokens present. If the number of tokens is bounded by a constant (e.g., on live, safe S-systems), alignments can be computed in polynomial time, whereas the problem is NP-complete if the number of tokens is part of the input, even for safe or live S-systems.

cs.FL↗

Deciding Reachability and the Covering Problem with Diagnostics for Sound Acyclic Free-Choice Workflow Nets

A central decision problem in Petri net theory is reachability asking whether a given marking can be reached from the initial marking. Related is the covering problem (or sub-marking reachbility), which decides whether there is a reachable marking covering at least the tokens in the given marking. For live and bounded free-choice nets as well as for sound free-choice workflow nets, both problems are polynomial in their computational complexity. This paper refines this complexity for the class of sound acyclic free-choice workflow nets to a quadratic polynomial, more specifically to $O(P^2 + T^2)$. Furthermore, this paper shows the feasibility of accurately explaining why a given marking is or is not reachable. This can be achieved by three new concepts: admissibility, maximum admissibility, and diverging transitions. Admissibility requires that all places in a given marking are pairwise concurrent. Maximum admissibility states that adding a marked place to an admissible marking would make it inadmissible. A diverging transition is a transition which originally "produces" the concurrent tokens that lead to a given marking. In this paper, we provide algorithms for all these concepts and explain their computation in detail by basing them on the concepts of concurrency and post-dominance frontiers - a well known concept from compiler construction. In doing this, we present straight-forward implementations for solving (sub-marking) reachability.

cs.FL↗