Christopher Toth | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

A Spatial Knowledge Acquisition Comparison Between Digital Visual Thematic Maps, Non-Visual Interactive Text Thematic Maps, and Tables

Digital maps are used to communicate generalized spatial information and relationships, yet are commonly made "accessible" using tables that lack geographic information. This study examines whether these tables and interactive text maps (ITMs) may be comparable to visual maps. Twenty sighted and 20 blind and low-vision individuals (BLVIs) performed tasks designed to compare visual maps, ITMs, and tables. Participants answered numeric, geographic, and combined numeric geographic questions using each representation, and performance, preference, and NASA-TLX were measured. Across both participant groups, map representations (visual and ITMs) significantly outperformed tables on geographic-based questions, while performance differences were minimal for numeric questions. For sighted participants, performance on geographic questions did not significantly differ between visual maps and ITMs, indicating that a larger powered study may find an "equivalent purpose" across these two conditions. Participants preferred map-based representations over tables. Perceived workload was highest for the ITM, intermediate for the visual map, and lowest for the table. Consistent with the Map Equivalent Purpose Framework, these findings indicate that Web Content Accessibility Guidelines-compliant ITMs can provide access to spatial information, unlike tables. These findings challenge prevailing accessibility practice that recommends tables lacking geographic information as map alternatives, and motivate reconsideration of accessibility legislation exempting digital thematic maps.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Enhancing Material Screening at Boulby Underground Laboratory with XIA UltraLo-1800 Alpha Particle Detectors

The Boulby UnderGround Screening (BUGS) facility, located at the Boulby Underground Laboratory, has significantly advanced its material screening capabilities by installing two XIA UltraLo-1800 alpha particle detectors. This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of one of these detectors, operated 1,100 meters underground at the Boulby Underground Laboratory, which provides significant shielding from cosmic radiation and maintains a low ambient radon activity of 2.30 $\pm$ 0.03 Bq/m$^3$. Our evaluation focuses on energy reconstruction accuracy, background radiation rates, and operational stability. The XIA UltraLo-1800 detector demonstrates remarkable stability in energy reconstruction, with less than 0.1 MeV variation over four years. Moreover, the implementation of a graphite-filled PTFE liner in the sample tray resulted in a significant reduction in background radiation levels compared to measurements with the original stainless steel tray, achieving an average activity of 0.15 $\pm$ 0.01 $\alpha$/cm$^2$/khr. Copper sample assays, performed before and after radon exposure, demonstrated the detector's ability to accurately identify and quantify $^{210}$Po contamination. By implementing the robust cleanliness procedures and protocols described in this article, we observed a reduction in $^{210}$Po activity from 0.504 $\pm$ 0.022 mBq to 0.336 $\pm$ 0.013 mBq, highlighting the crucial role of refined cleaning methods in minimizing background for sensitive experiments. Additionally, observations of elevated background activity levels post-high-activity sample measurements illustrate the need for careful management of assay conditions and environment to maintain low background levels. These results highlight the potential of the XIA UltraLo-1800 in enhancing the precision of material assays essential for reducing background interference in rare event experiments.

physics.ins-det↗