Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Christos M. Nikolakakos

Publications and source records attributed to Christos M. Nikolakakos.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Frequency Measurement Practices for Inertia Assessment in Inverter Based Resources Dominated Power Systems

Transmission system operators and protective relays compute the rate of change of frequency (RoCoF) from frequency averaged over tens to hundreds of milliseconds, as standards and grid codes specify. Any response delivered inside that window lowers the measured RoCoF, so the inferred inertia depends on the window and the responses in service. This paper defines the windowed inertia estimate and derives an exact identity the system inertia divided by one minus the fraction of the disturbance energy delivered inside the window and a closed-form prediction that applies the same estimator to the trajectory of a linear response model. Eleven IEEE 9-bus RMS runs synchronous, grid-following and grid-forming configurations, disturbance sizes and parameter sweeps are reproduced by that model, and the identity closes on the measured response powers. Fast frequency response inflates the estimate most: at 500 ms a grid-following system with 20 % less synchronous inertia reports the same value as the all-synchronous system, the grid-forming system a higher one. On a reduced Greek transmission system the 500ms estimate exceeds the inertia by 17-26%, and a scenario with 10% less synchronous inertia reports more than the all-synchronous scenario's inertia. Operators can thus compute what their measurement reports.

eess.SY↗

On the Achievable Inertia Constant of Inverter Based Resources

As inverter-based resources (IBRs) displace synchronous generators, the inertia they can actually contribute to the grid becomes a critical planning parameter. Unlike synchronous machines, this contribution is bounded simultaneously by the available energy reserve, the converter power rating combined with voltage ride-through (VRT) obligations, and the inertia-emulation control scheme with its activation delay. This paper derives each bound in closed form and combines them into a unified envelope $\Heff(t,λ,V_g)=\min(\HE,\HP,\HC)$, which uses parameters accessible to the system operator to quantify how much inertia a plant can provide at a given loading $λ$, grid voltage $V_g$, and time $t$ after a disturbance. The analysis shows that below a loading-dependent critical voltage, VRT reactive-current priority does not leave active-current headroom for inertial power injection; that the converter overload ratio $κ$ matters mainly during voltage dips; and that de-loading yields a linear, quantifiable inertia gain, while collocated energy storage (ESS) removes the source-coupling constraint, making grid-following (GFL) and grid-forming (GFM) plants with storage equivalent post-activation, up to the GFL activation-delay discount within short RoCoF measurement windows. Simulations on the IEEE 9-bus system confirm the framework and motivate a two-dimensional inertia capability curve $H(λ,V_{g,\min})$ as a grid-code instrument analogous to the P--Q diagram of synchronous generators.

eess.SY↗