SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Chuanming Zong

Publications and source records attributed to Chuanming Zong.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Some Mathematical Problems Behind Lattice-Based Cryptography

In 1994, P. Shor discovered quantum algorithms which can break both the RSA cryptosystem and the ElGamal cryptosystem. In 2007, D-Wave demonstrated the first quantum computer. These events and further developments have brought a crisis to secret communication. In 2016, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) launched a global project to solicit and select a handful of encryption algorithms with the ability to resist quantum computer attacks. In 2022, it announced four candidates, CRYSTALS-Kyber, CRYSTALS-Dilithium, Falcon and Sphincs$+$ for post-quantum cryptography standards. The first three are based on lattice theory and the last on the Hash function. It is well known that the security of the lattice-based cryptosystems relies on the computational complexity of the shortest vector problem (SVP), the closest vector problem (CVP) and their generalizations. In fact, the SVP is a ball packing problem and the CVP is a ball covering problem. Furthermore, both SVP and CVP are equivalent to arithmetic problems for positive definite quadratic forms. Therefore, post-quantum cryptography provides unprecedented opportunities for mathematicians to make contributions in modern technology. This paper will briefly review the mathematical problems on which the lattice-based cryptography is built up, so that mathematicians can see that they are indeed in the game.

math.MG

The Simultaneous Lattice Packing-Covering Constant of Octahedra

This paper proves that the simultaneous lattice packing-covering constant of an octahedron is $7/6$. In other words, $7/6$ is the smallest positive number $r$ such that for every octahedron $O$ centered at the origin there is a lattice $Λ$ such that $O+Λ$ is a packing in $\mathbb{E}^3$ and $rO+Λ$ is a covering of $\mathbb{E}^3$.

math.CO

On Generalized Kissing Numbers of Convex Bodies (II)

In 1694, Gregory and Newton discussed the problem to determine the kissing number of a rigid material ball. This problem and its higher dimensional generalization have been studied by many mathematicians, including Minkowski, van der Waerden, Hadwiger, Swinnerton-Dyer, Watson, Levenshtein, Odlyzko, Sloane and Musin. Recently, Li and Zong introduced and studied the generalized kissing numbers of convex bodies. As a continuation of this project, in this paper we obtain the exact generalized kissing numbers $κ_α^*(B^n)$ of the $n$-dimensional balls for $3\le n\le 8$ and $α=2\sqrt{3}-2$. Furthermore, the lattice kissing number of a four-dimensional cross-polytope is determined.

math.MG

On Generalized Kissing Numbers of Convex Bodies

In 1694, Gregory and Newton proposed the problem to determine the kissing number of a rigid material ball. This problem and its higher dimensional generalization have been studied by many mathematicians, including Minkowski, van der Waerden, Hadwiger, Swinnerton-Dyer, Watson, Levenshtein, Odlyzko, Sloane and Musin. In this paper, we introduce and study a further generalization of the kissing numbers for convex bodies and obtain some exact results, in particular for balls in dimensions three, four and eight.

math.MG

The Mathematical Foundation of Post-Quantum Cryptography

On July 5, 2022, the National Institute of Standards and Technology announced four possible post-quantum cryptography standards, three of them are based on lattice theory and the other one is based on Hash function. It is well-known that the security of the lattice cryptography relies on the hardness of the shortest vector problem (SVP) and the closest vector problem (CVP). In fact, the SVP is a sphere packing problem and the CVP is a sphere covering problem. Furthermore, both SVP and CVP are equivalent to arithmetic problems of positive definite quadratic forms. This paper will briefly introduce the post-quantum cryptography and show its connections with sphere packing, sphere covering, and positive definite quadratic forms.

cs.IT

Characterization of the Three-Dimensional Fivefold Translative Tiles

This paper proves the following statement: If a convex body can form a fivefold translative tiling in $\mathbb{E}^3$, it must be a parallelotope, a hexagonal prism, a rhombic dodecahedron, an elongated dodecahedron, a truncated octahedron, a cylinder over a particular octagon, or a cylinder over a particular decagon, where the octagon and the decagon are fivefold translative tiles in $\mathbb{E}^2$. Furthermore, it presents an example of multiple tiles in $\mathbb{E}^3$ with multiplicity at most 10 which is neither a parallelohedron nor a cylinder.

math.MG

Borsuk's Problem in Metric Spaces

In 1933, K. Borsuk proposed the following problem: Can every bounded set in $\mathbb{E}^n$ be divided into $n+1$ subsets of smaller diameters? In 1965, V. G. Boltyanski and I. T. Gohberg made the following conjecture: Every bounded set in an $n$-dimensional metric space can be divided into $2^n$ subsets of smaller diameters. In this paper, we prove the following result: Every bounded set in an $n$-dimensional metric space can be divided into $2^{n}((n+1)\log (n+1)+(n+1)\log \log (n+1)+5n+5)$ subsets of smaller diameters.

math.MG

Lower Bounds on Lattice Covering Densities of Simplices

This paper presents new lower bounds for the lattice covering densities of simplices by studying the Degree-Diameter Problem for abelian Cayley digraphs. In particular, it proves that the density of any lattice covering of a tetrahedron is at least $25/18$ and the density of any lattice covering of a four-dimensional simplex is at least $343/264$.

math.MG

The Three and Fourfold Translative Tiles in Three-Dimensional Space

This paper proves the following statement: If a convex body can form a three or fourfold translative tiling in the three-dimensional space, it must be a parallelohedron. In other words, it must be a parallelotope, a hexagonal prism, a rhombic dodecahedron, an elongated dodecahedron, or a truncated octahedron.

math.MG

Twofold Translative Tiles in Three-Dimensional Space

This paper proves the following statement: {\it If a convex body can form a twofold translative tiling in $\mathbb{E}^3$, it must be a parallelohedron.} In other words, it must be a parallelotope, a hexagonal prism, a rhombic dodecahedron, an elongated dodecahedron, or a truncated octahedron.

math.MG

Blaschke, Osgood, Wiener, Hadamard and the Early Development of Modern Mathematics in China

In ancient times, China made great contributions to world civilization and in particular to mathematics. However, modern sciences including mathematics came to China rather too late. The first Chinese university was founded in 1895. The first mathematics department in China was formally opened at the university only in 1913. At the beginning of the twentieth century, some Chinese went to Europe, the United States of America and Japan for higher education in modern mathematics and returned to China as the pioneer generation. They created mathematics departments at the Chinese universities and sowed the seeds of modern mathematics in China. In 1930s, when a dozen of Chinese universities already had mathematics departments, several leading mathematicians from Europe and USA visited China, including Wilhelm Blaschke, George D. Birkhoff, William F. Osgood, Norbert Wiener and Jacques Hadamard. Their visits not only had profound impact on the mathematical development in China, but also became social events sometimes. This paper tells the history of their visits.

math.HO

A Computer Program for Borsuk's Conjecture

In 1933, Borsuk proposed the following problem: Can every bounded set in $\mathbb{E}^n$ be divided into $n+1$ subsets of smaller diameters? This problem has been studied by many authors, and a lot of partial results have been discovered. In particular, Kahn and Kalai's counterexamples surprised the mathematical community in 1993. Nevertheless, the problem is still far away from being completely resolved. This paper presents a broad review on related subjects and, based on a novel reformulation, introduces a computer proof program to deal with this well-known problem.

math.MG

Classification of the sublattices of a lattice

In 1945-46, C. L. Siegel proved that an $n$-dimensional lattice $Λ$ of determinant ${\rm det}(Λ)$ has at most $m^{n^2}$ different sublattices of determinant $m\cdot {\rm det}(Λ)$. In 1997, the exact number of the different sublattices of index $m$ was determined by Baake. This paper presents a systematic treatment for counting the sublattices and deduces a formula for the number of the sublattice classes of determinant $m\cdot {\rm det}(Λ)$.

math.MG

A Computer Approach to Determine the Densest Translative Tetrahedron Packings

In 1900, as a part of his 18th problem, Hilbert proposed the question to determine the densest congruent (or translative) packings of a given solid, such as the unit ball or the regular tetrahedron of unit edges. Up to now, our knowledge about this problem is still very limited, excepting the ball case. It is conjectured that, for some particular solids such as tetrahedra, cuboctahedra and octahedra, their maximal translative packing densities and their maximal lattice packing densities are identical. To attack this conjecture, this paper suggests a computer approach to determine the maximal local translative packing density of a given polytope, by studying associated color graphs and applying optimization. In particular, all the tetrahedral case, the cuboctahedral case and the octahedral case of the conjecture have been reduced into finite numbers of manageable optimization problems.

math.MG

Can You Pave the Plane Nicely with Identical Tiles

Every body knows that identical regular triangles or squares can tile the whole plane. Many people know that identical regular hexagons can tile the plane properly as well. In fact, even the bees know and use this fact! Is there any other convex domain which can tile the Euclidean plane? Yes, there is a long list of them! To find the list and to show the completeness of the list is a unique drama in mathematics, which has lasted for more than one century and the completeness of the list has been mistakenly announced not only once! Up to now, the list consists of triangles, quadrilaterals, three types of hexagons, and fifteen types of pentagons. In 2017, Michael Rao announced a computer proof for the completeness of the list. Meanwhile, Qi Yang and Chuanming Zong made a series of unexpected discoveries in multiple tilings in the Euclidean plane. For examples, besides parallelograms and centrally symmetric hexagons, there is no other convex domain which can form any two-, three- or four-fold translative tiling in the plane; there are only two types of octagons and one type of decagons which can form five-fold translative tilings.

math.MG

Multiple Translative Tilings in Euclidean Spaces

In 1885, Fedorov discovered that a convex domain can form a lattice tiling of the Euclidean plane if and only if it is a parallelogram or a centrally symmetric hexagon. This paper proves the following results: Besides parallelograms and centrally symmetric hexagons, there is no other convex domain which can form a two-, three- or four-fold translative tiling in the Euclidean plane. However, there are two-dimensional convex domains which is neither a parallelogram nor a centrally symmetric hexagon can form five-fold translative tilings.

math.MG

Characterization of the Two-Dimensional Five-Fold Lattice Tiles

In 1885, Fedorov discovered that a convex domain can form a lattice tiling of the Euclidean plane if and only if it is a parallelogram or a centrally symmetric hexagon. It is known that there is no other convex domain which can form a two-, three- or four-fold lattice tiling in the Euclidean plane, but there is a centrally symmetric convex decagon which can form a five-fold lattice tiling. This paper characterizes all the convex domains which can form a five-fold lattice tiling of the Euclidean plane.

math.MG