arXiv subjects

Claudio Chiastra

Publications and source records attributed to Claudio Chiastra.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Influence of Plaque Characteristics on Stent Biomechanical Outcomes - A Case Study on Double Kissing Crush Coronary Stenting

Background Double Kissing (DK) Crush is a two-stent technique for complex coronary bifurcation lesions, yet the biomechanical influence of plaque on its performance remains poorly understood. This study developed a computational biomechanical model of the DK-Crush procedure to quantify how plaque presence and composition affect procedural outcomes and the performance of Xience Sierra and Orsiro stents. Methods A population-representative coronary bifurcation was modelled with no plaque, lipid plaque, and fibrous plaque. The complete DK-Crush sequence was simulated using finite element analysis for both stent platforms. Mechanical outcomes included arterial wall stress, malapposition, side branch ostium clearance, and residual stenosis. Post-deployment hemodynamics was assessed using pulsatile computational fluid dynamics, quantifying high shear rate volume and lumen area exposed to low time-averaged endothelial shear stress (TAESS). Results Plaque presence and stiffness reduced lumen restoration, increased arterial wall stress, led to larger high shear rate regions and, for fibrous plaque, increased exposure to low TAESS. Malapposition and ostial clearance depended mainly on stent design. Plaque also altered the relative performance of the two platforms, revealing differences not observed in plaque-free models. Conclusions Plaque characteristics substantially affect DK-Crush biomechanics and modify stent behaviour. Incorporating plaque is therefore essential for realistic computational evaluation of bifurcation stenting.

physics.bio-ph↗

arXiv2025

Mechanistic Insights Into How Rewiring and Bifurcation Angle Affect DK-Crush Stent Deployment

Background Double Kissing Crush (DKC) is a preferred two-stent technique for complex coronary bifurcation lesions. Proximal cell rewiring is routinely recommended to reduce technical failure, and DKC is considered effective across various bifurcation angles. However, it remains unclear whether this standard approach is optimal for all patients. This study investigates the interaction between bifurcation angle and rewiring configuration to identify anatomy-specific strategies. Methods Computational modeling of the DKC procedure was used to simulate 12 DKC procedures across three left main bifurcation angles (45{\deg}, 70{\deg}, and 100{\deg}) and four rewiring configurations: proximal-proximal (P-P), proximal-distal (P-D), distal-proximal (D-P), and distal-distal (D-D). Evaluation metrics included stent malapposition, side branch ostium clearance, arterial wall stress, low time-averaged endothelial shear stress, and high shear rates. Results DKC performed in wide bifurcations (100{\deg}) resulted in worse outcomes, with malapposition reaching 18%, side branch clearance down to 23%, and up to twice the exposure to adverse high shear rates compared to narrower angles. In contrast, intermediate (70{\deg}) and narrow (45{\deg}) angles generally resulted in more favorable outcomes, though optimal rewiring varied by angle. Proximal strategies, i.e. P-P and P-D, were most effective at 70{\deg}, while D-D performed best at 45{\deg}. No single strategy was consistently superior across all bifurcation angles. Conclusions DKC outcomes depend on bifurcation angle and can be optimized by tailoring rewiring strategies, challenging the current clinical understanding. These findings support anatomy-specific procedural planning and intravascular imaging to guide rewiring. This study provides a mechanistic rationale to improve clinical decision-making and tailor bifurcation interventions.

physics.med-ph↗

arXiv2025

Are Ultrathin Stents Optimal for Bifurcation Lesions? Insights from Computational Modelling of Provisional and DK-Crush Techniques

Complex coronary bifurcation lesions remain challenging in percutaneous coronary intervention, with stent design and deployment strategy influencing clinical outcomes. This study compares the mechanical and hemodynamic performance of the ultrathin-strut Orsiro and thin-strut Xience Sierra stent in Provisional Side Branch (PSB) and Double Kissing Crush (DKC) techniques. We used finite element analyses of bifurcation stent deployment to assess malapposition, ostium clearance, and arterial wall stress for both techniques. Computational fluid dynamics simulations quantified the luminal exposure to low Time-Averaged Endothelial Shear Stress (TAESS below 0.4 Pa) and high shear rates (above 1000 1/s). In PSB, Orsiro showed higher malapposition (13.0% vs 9.6%) but improved SB ostium clearance (77% vs 64%) and lower low-TAESS exposure (30.3% vs 33.6%) compared to Xience. Orsiro also produced higher arterial wall stresses, particularly during kissing balloon inflation. In DKC, differences in malapposition and ostium clearance diminished between stents, though Orsiro retained a hemodynamic advantage with lower low-TAESS (28.2% vs 36.3%).Stent design influenced outcomes more strongly in PSB, where anatomical interaction and platform-specific behavior impacted both structural and hemodynamic results. In DKC, procedural complexity minimized those differences, making the stenting technique the primary performance driver. Nonetheless, Orsiro consistently preserved more favorable flow conditions. These findings highlight the need to match device selection with lesion characteristics in PSB, while in DKC, optimizing procedural steps may have a greater impact than the choice of stent platform.

physics.med-ph↗

arXiv2016

Hemodynamics of Stent Implantation Procedures in Coronary Bifurcations: an in vitro study

Stent implantation in coronary bifurcations presents unique challenges and currently there is no universally accepted stent deployment approach. Despite clinical and computational studies, to date, the effect of each stent implantation method on the coronary artery hemodynamics is not well understood. In this study the hemodynamics of stented coronary bifurcations under pulsatile flow conditions were investigated experimentally. Three implantation methods, provisional side branch (PSB), culotte (CUL), and crush (CRU), were investigated using time-resolved particle image velocimetry (PIV) to measure the velocity fields. Subsequently, hemodynamic parameters including wall shear stress (WSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT) were calculated and the pressure field through the vessel was non-invasively quantified. The effects of each stented case were evaluated and compared against an un-stented case. CRU provided the lowest compliance mismatch, but demonstrated detrimental stent interactions. PSB, the clinically preferred method, and CUL maintained many normal flow conditions. However, PSB provided about a 300% increase in both OSI and RRT. CUL yielded a 10% and 85% increase in OSI and RRT, respectively. The results of this study support the concept that different bifurcation stenting techniques result in hemodynamic environments that deviate from that of un-stented bifurcations, to varying degrees.

physics.flu-dyn↗