arXiv subjects

Cody B. Hyndman

Publications and source records attributed to Cody B. Hyndman.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2019

Deep Learning in a Generalized HJM-type Framework Through Arbitrage-Free Regularization

We introduce a regularization approach to arbitrage-free factor-model selection. The considered model selection problem seeks to learn the closest arbitrage-free HJM-type model to any prespecified factor-model. An asymptotic solution to this, a priori computationally intractable, problem is represented as the limit of a 1-parameter family of optimizers to computationally tractable model selection tasks. Each of these simplified model-selection tasks seeks to learn the most similar model, to the prescribed factor-model, subject to a penalty detecting when the reference measure is a local martingale-measure for the entire underlying financial market. A simple expression for the penalty terms is obtained in the bond market withing the affine-term structure setting, and it is used to formulate a deep-learning approach to arbitrage-free affine term-structure modelling. Numerical implementations are also performed to evaluate the performance in the bond market.

q-fin.MF↗

arXiv2018

Non-Euclidean Conditional Expectation and Filtering

A non-Euclidean generalization of conditional expectation is introduced and characterized as the minimizer of expected intrinsic squared-distance from a manifold-valued target. The computational tractable formulation expresses the non-convex optimization problem as transformations of Euclidean conditional expectation. This gives computationally tractable filtering equations for the dynamics of the intrinsic conditional expectation of a manifold-valued signal and is used to obtain accurate numerical forecasts of efficient portfolios by incorporating their geometric structure into the estimates.

q-fin.MF↗

arXiv2016

GMWB Riders in a Binomial Framework - Pricing, Hedging, and Diversification of Mortality Risk

We construct a binomial model for a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB) rider to a variable annuity (VA) under optimal policyholder behaviour. The binomial model results in explicitly formulated perfect hedging strategies funded using only periodic fee income. We consider the separate perspectives of the insurer and policyholder and introduce a unifying relationship. Decompositions of the VA and GMWB contract into term-certain payments and options representing the guarantee and early surrender features are extended to the binomial framework. We incorporate an approximation algorithm for Asian options that significantly improves efficiency of the binomial model while retaining accuracy. Several numerical examples are provided which illustrate both the accuracy and the tractability of the binomial model. We extend the binomial model to include policy holder mortality and death benefits. Pricing, hedging, and the decompositions of the contract are extended to incorporate mortality risk. We prove limiting results for the hedging strategies and demonstrate mortality risk diversification. Numerical examples are provided which illustrate the effectiveness of hedging and the diversification of mortality risk under capacity constraints with finite pools.

q-fin.PR↗

arXiv2013

Valuation Perspectives and Decompositions for Variable Annuities with GMWB riders

The guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB) rider, as an add on to a variable annuity (VA), guarantees the return of premiums in the form of peri- odic withdrawals while allowing policyholders to participate fully in any market gains. GMWB riders represent an embedded option on the account value with a fee structure that is different from typical financial derivatives. We consider fair pricing of the GMWB rider from a financial economic perspective. Particular focus is placed on the distinct perspectives of the insurer and policyholder and the unifying relationship. We extend a decomposition of the VA contract into components that reflect term-certain payments and embedded derivatives to the case where the policyholder has the option to surrender, or lapse, the contract early.

q-fin.PR↗