Beyond Anthropomorphism: a Spectrum of Interface Metaphors for LLMs
Anthropomorphizing conversational technology is a natural human tendency. Today, the anthropomorphic metaphor is overly reinforced across intelligent tools. Large Language Models (LLMs) are particularly anthropomorphized through interface design. While metaphors are inherently partial, anthropomorphic interfaces highlight similarities between LLMs and humans, but mask crucial differences. As a result, the metaphor is often taken literally; users treat LLMs as if they are truly human. With few safeguards in place, this extreme anthropomorphism drives users to delusion and harm. Users also experience dissonance between the ethics of using LLMs, their growing ubiquity, and limited interface alternatives. We propose repositioning anthropomorphism as a design variable, developing opposing extremes as a theoretical framework for how interface metaphors shape and can disrupt the default metaphor. We introduce a spectrum of metaphors from transparency-driven ''anti-anthropomorphism'' to uncanny ''hyper-anthropomorphism''. These metaphors introduce materiality to interface metaphors, exposing LLMs as sociotechnical systems shaped by human labor, infrastructure, and data. This spectrum shifts interface design away from optimizing usability and toward encouraging critical engagement.