arXiv subjects

Corwin Zigler

Publications and source records attributed to Corwin Zigler.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Time-Varying Confounding Bias in Observational Geoscience with Application to Induced Seismicity

Evidence derived primarily from physical models has identified saltwater disposal as the dominant causal factor that contributes to induced seismicity. To complement physical models, statistical/machine learning (ML) models are designed to measure associations from observational data, either with parametric regression models or more flexible ML models. However, it is often difficult to interpret the statistical significance of a parameter or the predicative power of a model as evidence of causation. We adapt a causal inference framework with the potential outcomes perspective to explicitly define what we meant by causal effect and declare necessary identification conditions to recover unbiased causal effect estimates. In particular, we illustrate the threat of time-varying confounding in observational longitudinal geoscience data through simulations and adapt established statistical methods for longitudinal analysis from the causal interference literature to estimate the effect of wastewater disposal on earthquakes in the Fort-Worth Basin of North Central Texas from 2013 to 2016.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2025

Toward a Data Processing Pipeline for Mobile-Phone Tracking Data

As mobile phones become ubiquitous, high-frequency smartphone positioning data are increasingly being used by researchers studying the mobility patterns of individuals as they go about their daily routines and the consequences of these patterns for health, behavioral, and other outcomes. A complex data pipeline underlies empirical research leveraging mobile phone tracking data. A key component of this pipeline is transforming raw, time-stamped positions into analysis-ready data objects, typically space-time "trajectories." In this paper, we break down a key portion of the data analysis pipeline underlying the Adolescent Health and Development in Context (AHDC) Study, a large-scale, longitudinal study of youth residing in the Columbus, OH metropolitan area. Recognizing that the bespoke "binning algorithm" used by AHDC researchers resembles a time-series filtering algorithm, we propose a statistical framework - a formal probability model and computational approach to inference - inspired by the binning algorithm for transforming noisy, time-stamped geographic positioning observations into mobility trajectories that capture periods of travel and stability. Our framework, unlike the binning algorithm, allows for formal smoothing via a particle Gibbs algorithm, improving estimation of trajectories as compared to the original binning algorithm. We argue that our framework can be used as a default data processing tool for future mobile-phone tracking studies.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2025

Disentangling network dependence among multiple variables

When two variables depend on the same or similar underlying network, their shared network dependence structure can lead to spurious associations. While statistical associations between two variables sampled from interconnected subjects are a common inferential goal across various fields, little research has focused on how to disentangle shared dependence for valid statistical inference. We revisit two different approaches from distinct fields that may address shared network dependence: the pre-whitening approach, commonly used in time series analysis to remove the shared temporal dependence, and the network autocorrelation model, widely used in network analysis often to examine or account for autocorrelation of the outcome variable. We demonstrate how each approach implicitly entails assumptions about how a variable of interest propagates among nodes via network ties given the network structure. We further propose adaptations of existing pre-whitening methods to the network setting by explicitly reflecting underlying assumptions about "level of interaction" that induce network dependence, while accounting for its unique complexities. Our simulation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of the two approaches in reducing spurious associations due to shared network dependence when their respective assumptions hold. However, the results also show the sensitivity to assumption violations, underscoring the importance of correctly specifying the shared dependence structure based on available network information and prior knowledge about the interactions driving dependence.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Multivariate Causal Effects: a Bayesian Causal Regression Factor Model

The impact of wildfire smoke on air quality is a growing concern, contributing to air pollution through a complex mixture of chemical species with important implications for public health. While previous studies have primarily focused on its association with total particulate matter (PM2.5), the causal relationship between wildfire smoke and the chemical composition of PM2.5 remains largely unexplored. Exposure to these chemical mixtures plays a critical role in shaping public health, yet capturing their relationships requires advanced statistical methods capable of modeling the complex dependencies among chemical species. To fill this gap, we propose a Bayesian causal regression factor model that estimates the multivariate causal effects of wildfire smoke on the concentration of 27 chemical species in PM2.5 across the United States. Our approach introduces two key innovations: (i) a causal inference framework for multivariate potential outcomes, and (ii) a novel Bayesian factor model that employs a probit stick-breaking process as prior for treatment-specific factor scores. By focusing on factor scores, our method addresses the missing data challenge common in causal inference and enables a flexible, data-driven characterization of the latent factor structure, which is crucial to capture the complex correlation among multivariate outcomes. Through Monte Carlo simulations, we show the model's accuracy in estimating the causal effects in multivariate outcomes and characterizing the treatment-specific latent structure. Finally, we apply our method to US air quality data, estimating the causal effect of wildfire smoke on 27 chemical species in PM2.5, providing a deeper understanding of their interdependencies.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

Bayesian Nonparametric Trees for Principal Causal Effects

Principal stratification analysis evaluates how causal effects of a treatment on a primary outcome vary across strata of units defined by their treatment effect on some intermediate quantity. This endeavor is substantially challenged when the intermediate variable is continuously scaled and there are infinitely many basic principal strata. We employ a Bayesian nonparametric approach to flexibly evaluate treatment effects across flexibly-modeled principal strata. The approach uses Bayesian Causal Forests (BCF) to simultaneously specify two Bayesian Additive Regression Tree models; one for the principal stratum membership and one for the outcome, conditional on principal strata. We show how the capability of BCF for capturing treatment effect heterogeneity is particularly relevant for assessing how treatment effects vary across the surface defined by continuously-scaled principal strata, in addition to other benefits relating to targeted selection and regularization-induced confounding. The capabilities of the proposed approach are illustrated with a simulation study, and the methodology is deployed to investigate how causal effects of power plant emissions control technologies on ambient particulate pollution vary as a function of the technologies' impact on sulfur dioxide emissions.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

Causal Analysis of Air Pollution Mixtures: Estimands, Positivity, and Extrapolation

Causal inference for air pollution mixtures is an increasingly important issue with appreciable challenges. When the exposure is a multivariate mixture, there are many exposure contrasts that may be of nominal interest for causal effect estimation, but the complex joint mixture distribution often renders observed data extremely limited in their ability to inform estimates of many commonly-defined causal effects. We use potential outcomes to 1) define causal effects of air pollution mixtures, 2) formalize the key assumption of mixture positivity required for estimation and 3) offer diagnostic metrics for positivity violations in the mixture setting that allow researchers to assess the extent to which data can actually support estimation of mixture effects of interest. For settings where there is limited empirical support, we redefine causal estimands that apportion causal effects according to whether they can be directly informed by observed data versus rely entirely on model extrapolation, isolating key sources of information on the causal effect of an air pollution mixture. The ideas are deployed to assess the ability of a national United States data set on the chemical components of ambient particulate matter air pollution to support estimation of a variety of causal mixture effects.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Statistical Inference for Complete and Incomplete Mobility Trajectories under the Flight-Pause Model

We formulate a statistical flight-pause model for human mobility, represented by a collection of random objects, called motions, appropriate for mobile phone tracking (MPT) data. We develop the statistical machinery for parameter inference and trajectory imputation under various forms of missing data. We show that common assumptions about the missing data mechanism for MPT are not valid for the mechanism governing the random motions underlying the flight-pause model, representing an understudied missing data phenomenon. We demonstrate the consequences of missing data and our proposed adjustments in both simulations and real data, outlining implications for MPT data collection and design.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Bipartite Interference and Air Pollution Transport: Estimating Health Effects of Power Plant Interventions

Evaluating air quality interventions is confronted with the challenge of interference since interventions at a particular pollution source likely impact air quality and health at distant locations and air quality and health at any given location are likely impacted by interventions at many sources. The structure of interference in this context is dictated by complex atmospheric processes governing how pollution emitted from a particular source is transformed and transported across space, and can be cast with a bipartite structure reflecting the two distinct types of units: 1) interventional units on which treatments are applied or withheld to change pollution emissions; and 2) outcome units on which outcomes of primary interest are measured. We propose new estimands for bipartite causal inference with interference that construe two components of treatment: a "key-associated" (or "individual") treatment and an "upwind" (or "neighborhood") treatment. Estimation is carried out using a semi-parametric adjustment approach based on joint propensity scores. A reduced-complexity atmospheric model is deployed to characterize the structure of the interference network by modeling the movement of air parcels through time and space. The new methods are deployed to evaluate the effectiveness of installing flue-gas desulfurization scrubbers on 472 coal-burning power plants (the interventional units) in reducing Medicare hospitalizations among 21,577,552 Medicare beneficiaries residing across 25,553 ZIP codes in the United States (the outcome units).

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

Weather2vec: Representation Learning for Causal Inference with Non-Local Confounding in Air Pollution and Climate Studies

Estimating the causal effects of a spatially-varying intervention on a spatially-varying outcome may be subject to non-local confounding (NLC), a phenomenon that can bias estimates when the treatments and outcomes of a given unit are dictated in part by the covariates of other nearby units. In particular, NLC is a challenge for evaluating the effects of environmental policies and climate events on health-related outcomes such as air pollution exposure. This paper first formalizes NLC using the potential outcomes framework, providing a comparison with the related phenomenon of causal interference. Then, it proposes a broadly applicable framework, termed "weather2vec", that uses the theory of balancing scores to learn representations of non-local information into a scalar or vector defined for each observational unit, which is subsequently used to adjust for confounding in conjunction with causal inference methods. The framework is evaluated in a simulation study and two case studies on air pollution where the weather is an (inherently regional) known confounder.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2019

Uncertainty in the Design Stage of Two-Stage Bayesian Propensity Score Analysis

The two-stage process of propensity score analysis (PSA) includes a design stage where propensity scores are estimated and implemented to approximate a randomized experiment and an analysis stage where treatment effects are estimated conditional upon the design. This paper considers how uncertainty associated with the design stage impacts estimation of causal effects in the analysis stage. Such design uncertainty can derive from the fact that the propensity score itself is an estimated quantity, but also from other features of the design stage tied to choice of propensity score implementation. This paper offers a procedure for obtaining the posterior distribution of causal effects after marginalizing over a distribution of design-stage outputs, lending a degree of formality to Bayesian methods for PSA (BPSA) that have gained attention in recent literature. Formulation of a probability distribution for the design-stage output depends on how the propensity score is implemented in the design stage, and propagation of uncertainty into causal estimates depends on how the treatment effect is estimated in the analysis stage. We explore these differences within a sample of commonly-used propensity score implementations (quantile stratification, nearest-neighbor matching, caliper matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and doubly robust estimation) and investigate in a simulation study the impact of statistician choice in PS model and implementation on the degree of between- and within-design variability in the estimated treatment effect. The methods are then deployed in an investigation of the association between levels of fine particulate air pollution and elevated exposure to emissions from coal-fired power plants.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2019

Posterior Predictive Treatment Assignment Methods for Causal Inference in the Context of Time-Varying Treatments

Marginal structural models (MSM) with inverse probability weighting (IPW) are used to estimate causal effects of time-varying treatments, but can result in erratic finite-sample performance when there is low overlap in covariate distributions across different treatment patterns. Modifications to IPW which target the average treatment effect (ATE) estimand either introduce bias or rely on unverifiable parametric assumptions and extrapolation. This paper extends an alternate estimand, the average treatment effect on the overlap population (ATO) which is estimated on a sub-population with a reasonable probability of receiving alternate treatment patterns in time-varying treatment settings. To estimate the ATO within a MSM framework, this paper extends a stochastic pruning method based on the posterior predictive treatment assignment (PPTA) as well as a weighting analogue to the time-varying treatment setting. Simulations demonstrate the performance of these extensions compared against IPW and stabilized weighting with regard to bias, efficiency and coverage. Finally, an analysis using these methods is performed on Medicare beneficiaries residing across 18,480 zip codes in the U.S. to evaluate the effect of coal-fired power plant emissions exposure on ischemic heart disease hospitalization, accounting for seasonal patterns that lead to change in treatment over time.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2019

Bayesian data fusion for unmeasured confounding

Bayesian causal inference offers a principled approach to policy evaluation of proposed interventions on mediators or time-varying exposures. We outline a general approach to the estimation of causal quantities for settings with time-varying confounding, such as exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounders. We further extend this approach to propose two Bayesian data fusion (BDF) methods for unmeasured confounding. Using informative priors on quantities relating to the confounding bias parameters, our methods incorporate data from an external source where the confounder is measured in order to make inferences about causal estimands in the main study population. We present results from a simulation study comparing our data fusion methods to two common frequentist correction methods for unmeasured confounding bias in the mediation setting. We also demonstrate our method with an investigation of the role of stage at cancer diagnosis in contributing to Black-White colorectal cancer survival disparities.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2019

A Source-Oriented Approach to Coal Power Plant Emissions Health Effects

There is increasing focus on whether air pollution originating from different sources has different health implications. In particular, recent evidence suggests that fine particulate matter (PM2.5) with chemical tracers suggesting coal combustion origins is especially harmful. Augmenting this knowledge with estimates from causal inference methods to identify the health impacts of PM2.5 derived from specific point sources of coal combustion would be an important step towards informing specific, targeted interventions. We investigated the effect of high-exposure to coal combustion emissions from 783 coal-fired power generating units on ischemic heart disease (IHD) hospitalizations in over 19 million Medicare beneficiaries residing at 21,351 ZIP codes in the eastern United States. We used InMAP, a newly-developed, reduced-complexity air quality model to classify each ZIP code as either a high-exposed or control location. Our health outcomes analysis uses a causal inference method - propensity score matching - to adjust for potential confounders of the relationship between exposure and IHD. We fit separate Poisson regression models to the matched data in each geographic region to estimate the incidence rate ratio for IHD comparing high-exposed to control locations. High exposure to coal power plant emissions and IHD were positively associated in the Northeast (IRR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.09) and the Southeast (IRR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.08). No significant association was found in the Industrial Midwest (IRR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.04), likely the result of small exposure contrasts between high-exposed and control ZIP codes in that region. This study provides targeted evidence of the association between emissions from specific coal power plants and IHD hospitalizations among Medicare beneficiaries.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2019

Bayesian Methods for Multiple Mediators: Relating Principal Stratification and Causal Mediation in the Analysis of Power Plant Emission Controls

Emission control technologies installed on power plants are a key feature of many air pollution regulations in the US. While such regulations are predicated on the presumed relationships between emissions, ambient air pollution, and human health, many of these relationships have never been empirically verified. The goal of this paper is to develop new statistical methods to quantify these relationships. We frame this problem as one of mediation analysis to evaluate the extent to which the effect of a particular control technology on ambient pollution is mediated through causal effects on power plant emissions. Since power plants emit various compounds that contribute to ambient pollution, we develop new methods for multiple intermediate variables that are measured contemporaneously, may interact with one another, and may exhibit joint mediating effects. Specifically, we propose new methods leveraging two related frameworks for causal inference in the presence of mediating variables: principal stratification and causal mediation analysis. We define principal effects based on multiple mediators, and also introduce a new decomposition of the total effect of an intervention on ambient pollution into the natural direct effect and natural indirect effects for all combinations of mediators. Both approaches are anchored to the same observed-data models, which we specify with Bayesian nonparametric techniques. We provide assumptions for estimating principal causal effects, then augment these with an additional assumption required for causal mediation analysis. The two analyses, interpreted in tandem, provide the first empirical investigation of the presumed causal pathways that motivate important air quality regulatory policies.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2019

Survivor average causal effects for continuous time: a principal stratification approach to causal inference with semicompeting risks

In semicompeting risks problems, nonterminal time-to-event outcomes such as time to hospital readmission are subject to truncation by death. These settings are often modeled with illness-death models for the hazards of the terminal and nonterminal events, but evaluating causal treatment effects with hazard models is problematic due to conditioning on survival (a post-treatment outcome) that is embedded in the definition of a hazard. Extending an existing survivor average causal effect (SACE) estimand, we frame the evaluation of treatment effects in the context of semicompeting risks with principal stratification and introduce two new causal estimands: the time-varying survivor average causal effect (TV-SACE) and the restricted mean survivor average causal effect (RM-SACE). These principal causal effects are defined among units that would survive regardless of assigned treatment. We adopt a Bayesian estimation procedure that parameterizes illness-death models for both treatment arms. We outline a frailty specification that can accommodate within-person correlation between nonterminal and terminal event times, and we discuss potential avenues for adding model flexibility. The method is demonstrated in the context of hospital readmission among late-stage pancreatic cancer patients.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2017

Adjusting for Unmeasured Spatial Confounding with Distance Adjusted Propensity Score Matching

Propensity score matching is a common tool for adjusting for observed confounding in observational studies, but is known to have limitations in the presence of unmeasured confounding. In many settings, researchers are confronted with spatially-indexed data where the relative locations of the observational units may serve as a useful proxy for unmeasured confounding that varies according to a spatial pattern. We develop a new method, termed Distance Adjusted Propensity Score Matching (DAPSm) that incorporates information on units' spatial proximity into a propensity score matching procedure. We show that DAPSm can adjust for both observed and some forms of unobserved confounding and evaluate its performance relative to several other reasonable alternatives for incorporating spatial information into propensity score adjustment. The method is motivated by and applied to a comparative effectiveness investigation of power plant emission reduction technologies designed to reduce population exposure to ambient ozone pollution. Ultimately, DAPSm provides a framework for augmenting a "standard" propensity score analysis with information on spatial proximity and provides a transparent and principled way to assess the relative trade offs of prioritizing observed confounding adjustment versus spatial proximity adjustment.

stat.ME↗