arXiv subjects

Costas S. Iliopoulos

Publications and source records attributed to Costas S. Iliopoulos.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2013

The Swap Matching Problem Revisited

In this paper, we revisit the much studied problem of Pattern Matching with Swaps (Swap Matching problem, for short). We first present a graph-theoretic model, which opens a new and so far unexplored avenue to solve the problem. Then, using the model, we devise two efficient algorithms to solve the swap matching problem. The resulting algorithms are adaptations of the classic shift-and algorithm. For patterns having length similar to the word-size of the target machine, both the algorithms run in linear time considering a fixed alphabet.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2013

Suffix Tree of Alignment: An Efficient Index for Similar Data

We consider an index data structure for similar strings. The generalized suffix tree can be a solution for this. The generalized suffix tree of two strings $A$ and $B$ is a compacted trie representing all suffixes in $A$ and $B$. It has $|A|+|B|$ leaves and can be constructed in $O(|A|+|B|)$ time. However, if the two strings are similar, the generalized suffix tree is not efficient because it does not exploit the similarity which is usually represented as an alignment of $A$ and $B$. In this paper we propose a space/time-efficient suffix tree of alignment which wisely exploits the similarity in an alignment. Our suffix tree for an alignment of $A$ and $B$ has $|A| + l_d + l_1$ leaves where $l_d$ is the sum of the lengths of all parts of $B$ different from $A$ and $l_1$ is the sum of the lengths of some common parts of $A$ and $B$. We did not compromise the pattern search to reduce the space. Our suffix tree can be searched for a pattern $P$ in $O(|P|+occ)$ time where $occ$ is the number of occurrences of $P$ in $A$ and $B$. We also present an efficient algorithm to construct the suffix tree of alignment. When the suffix tree is constructed from scratch, the algorithm requires $O(|A| + l_d + l_1 + l_2)$ time where $l_2$ is the sum of the lengths of other common substrings of $A$ and $B$. When the suffix tree of $A$ is already given, it requires $O(l_d + l_1 + l_2)$ time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2013

Order-Preserving Suffix Trees and Their Algorithmic Applications

Recently Kubica et al. (Inf. Process. Let., 2013) and Kim et al. (submitted to Theor. Comp. Sci.) introduced order-preserving pattern matching. In this problem we are looking for consecutive substrings of the text that have the same "shape" as a given pattern. These results include a linear-time order-preserving pattern matching algorithm for polynomially-bounded alphabet and an extension of this result to pattern matching with multiple patterns. We make one step forward in the analysis and give an $O(\frac{n\log{n}}{\log\log{n}})$ time randomized algorithm constructing suffix trees in the order-preserving setting. We show a number of applications of order-preserving suffix trees to identify patterns and repetitions in time series.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2013

Order Preserving Matching

We introduce a new string matching problem called order-preserving matching on numeric strings where a pattern matches a text if the text contains a substring whose relative orders coincide with those of the pattern. Order-preserving matching is applicable to many scenarios such as stock price analysis and musical melody matching in which the order relations should be matched instead of the strings themselves. Solving order-preserving matching has to do with representations of order relations of a numeric string. We define prefix representation and nearest neighbor representation, which lead to efficient algorithms for order-preserving matching. We present efficient algorithms for single and multiple pattern cases. For the single pattern case, we give an O(n log m) time algorithm and optimize it further to obtain O(n + m log m) time. For the multiple pattern case, we give an O(n log m) time algorithm.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2012

Identifying all abelian periods of a string in quadratic time and relevant problems

Abelian periodicity of strings has been studied extensively over the last years. In 2006 Constantinescu and Ilie defined the abelian period of a string and several algorithms for the computation of all abelian periods of a string were given. In contrast to the classical period of a word, its abelian version is more flexible, factors of the word are considered the same under any internal permutation of their letters. We show two O(|y|^2) algorithms for the computation of all abelian periods of a string y. The first one maps each letter to a suitable number such that each factor of the string can be identified by the unique sum of the numbers corresponding to its letters and hence abelian periods can be identified easily. The other one maps each letter to a prime number such that each factor of the string can be identified by the unique product of the numbers corresponding to its letters and so abelian periods can be identified easily. We also define weak abelian periods on strings and give an O(|y|log(|y|)) algorithm for their computation, together with some other algorithms for more basic problems.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2011

Efficient Seeds Computation Revisited

The notion of the cover is a generalization of a period of a string, and there are linear time algorithms for finding the shortest cover. The seed is a more complicated generalization of periodicity, it is a cover of a superstring of a given string, and the shortest seed problem is of much higher algorithmic difficulty. The problem is not well understood, no linear time algorithm is known. In the paper we give linear time algorithms for some of its versions --- computing shortest left-seed array, longest left-seed array and checking for seeds of a given length. The algorithm for the last problem is used to compute the seed array of a string (i.e., the shortest seeds for all the prefixes of the string) in $O(n^2)$ time. We describe also a simpler alternative algorithm computing efficiently the shortest seeds. As a by-product we obtain an $O(n\log{(n/m)})$ time algorithm checking if the shortest seed has length at least $m$ and finding the corresponding seed. We also correct some important details missing in the previously known shortest-seed algorithm (Iliopoulos et al., 1996).

cs.DS↗