arXiv subjects

Costis Maglaras

Publications and source records attributed to Costis Maglaras.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2022

Risk-Sensitive Optimal Execution via a Conditional Value-at-Risk Objective

We consider a liquidation problem in which a risk-averse trader tries to liquidate a fixed quantity of an asset in the presence of market impact and random price fluctuations. The trader encounters a trade-off between the transaction costs incurred due to market impact and the volatility risk of holding the position. Our formulation begins with a continuous-time and infinite horizon variation of the seminal model of Almgren and Chriss (2000), but we define as the objective the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) of the implementation shortfall, and allow for dynamic (adaptive) trading strategies. In this setting, we are able to derive closed-form expressions for the optimal liquidation strategy and its value function. Our results yield a number of important practical insights. We are able to quantify the benefit of adaptive policies over optimized static policies. The relevant improvement depends only on the level of risk aversion: for moderate levels of risk aversion, the optimal dynamic policy outperforms the optimal static policy by 5-15%, and outperforms the optimal volume weighted average price (VWAP) policy by 15-25%. This improvement is achieved through dynamic policies that exhibit "aggressiveness-in-the-money": trading is accelerated when price movements are favorable, and is slowed when price movements are unfavorable. From a mathematical perspective, our analysis exploits the dual representation of CVaR to convert the problem to a continuous-time, zero-sum game. We leverage the idea of the state-space augmentation, and obtain a partial differential equation describing the optimal value function, which is separable and a special instance of the Emden-Fowler equation. This leads to a closed-form solution. As our problem is a special case of a linear-quadratic-Gaussian control problem with a CVaR objective, these results may be interesting in broader settings.

q-fin.TR↗

arXiv2021

Thompson Sampling with Information Relaxation Penalties

We consider a finite-horizon multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem in a Bayesian setting, for which we propose an information relaxation sampling framework. With this framework, we define an intuitive family of control policies that include Thompson sampling (TS) and the Bayesian optimal policy as endpoints. Analogous to TS, which, at each decision epoch pulls an arm that is best with respect to the randomly sampled parameters, our algorithms sample entire future reward realizations and take the corresponding best action. However, this is done in the presence of "penalties" that seek to compensate for the availability of future information. We develop several novel policies and performance bounds for MAB problems that vary in terms of improving performance and increasing computational complexity between the two endpoints. Our policies can be viewed as natural generalizations of TS that simultaneously incorporate knowledge of the time horizon and explicitly consider the exploration-exploitation trade-off. We prove associated structural results on performance bounds and suboptimality gaps. Numerical experiments suggest that this new class of policies perform well, in particular in settings where the finite time horizon introduces significant exploration-exploitation tension into the problem. Finally, inspired by the finite-horizon Gittins index, we propose an index policy that builds on our framework that particularly outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithms in our numerical experiments.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Cross-Sectional Variation of Intraday Liquidity, Cross-Impact, and their Effect on Portfolio Execution

The composition of natural liquidity has been changing over time. An analysis of intraday volumes for the S&P500 constituent stocks illustrates that (i) volume surprises, i.e., deviations from their respective forecasts, are correlated across stocks, and (ii) this correlation increases during the last few hours of the trading session. These observations could be attributed, in part, to the prevalence of portfolio trading activity that is implicit in the growth of ETF, passive and systematic investment strategies; and, to the increased trading intensity of such strategies towards the end of the trading session, e.g., due to execution of mutual fund inflows/outflows that are benchmarked to the closing price on each day. In this paper, we investigate the consequences of such portfolio liquidity on price impact and portfolio execution. We derive a linear cross-asset market impact from a stylized model that explicitly captures the fact that a certain fraction of natural liquidity providers only trade portfolios of stocks whenever they choose to execute. We find that due to cross-impact and its intraday variation, it is optimal for a risk-neutral, cost minimizing liquidator to execute a portfolio of orders in a coupled manner, as opposed to a separable VWAP-like execution that is often assumed. The optimal schedule couples the execution of the various orders so as to be able to take advantage of increased portfolio liquidity towards the end of the day. A worst case analysis shows that the potential cost reduction from this optimized execution schedule over the separable approach can be as high as 6% for plausible model parameters. Finally, we discuss how to estimate cross-sectional price impact if one had a dataset of realized portfolio transaction records that exploits the low-rank structure of its coefficient matrix suggested by our analysis.

q-fin.TR↗