Another Way to Perform the Quantum Fourier Transform in Linear Parallel Time
This paper has been withdrawn.
quant-ph↗
arXiv subjects
Cristopher Moore
Publications and source records attributed to Cristopher Moore.
Quantum Automata and Quantum Grammars
To study quantum computation, it might be helpful to generalize structures from language and automata theory to the quantum case. To that end, we propose quantum versions of finite-state and push-down automata, and regular and context-free grammars. We find analogs of several classical theorems, including pumping lemmas, closure properties, rational and algebraic generating functions, and Greibach normal form. We also show that there are quantum context-free languages that are not context-free.
quant-ph↗
Lattice Gas Prediction is P-complete
We show that predicting the HPP or FHP III lattice gas for finite time is equivalent to calculating the output of an arbitrary Boolean circuit, and is therefore P-complete: that is, it is just as hard as any other problem solvable by a serial computer in polynomial time. It is widely believed in computer science that there are inherently sequential problems, for which parallel processing gives no significant speedup. Unless this is false, it is impossible even with highly parallel processing to predict lattice gases much faster than by explicit simulation. More precisely, we cannot predict t time-steps of a lattice gas in parallel computation time O(log^k t) for any k, or O(t^α) for α< 1/2, unless the class P is equal to the class NC or SP respectively.
comp-gas↗
Quasi-Linear Cellular Automata
Simulating a cellular automaton (CA) for t time-steps into the future requires t^2 serial computation steps or t parallel ones. However, certain CAs based on an Abelian group, such as addition mod 2, are termed ``linear'' because they obey a principle of superposition. This allows them to be predicted efficiently, in serial time O(t) or O(log t) in parallel. In this paper, we generalize this by looking at CAs with a variety of algebraic structures, including quasigroups, non-Abelian groups, Steiner systems, and others. We show that in many cases, an efficient algorithm exists even though these CAs are not linear in the previous sense; we term them ``quasilinear.'' We find examples which can be predicted in serial time proportional to t, t log t, t log^2 t, and t^a for a < 2, and parallel time log t, log t log log t and log^2 t. We also discuss what algebraic properties are required or implied by the existence of scaling relations and principles of superposition, and exhibit several novel ``vector-valued'' CAs.
adap-org↗
Predicting Non-linear Cellular Automata Quickly by Decomposing Them into Linear Ones
We show that a wide variety of non-linear cellular automata (CAs) can be decomposed into a quasidirect product of linear ones. These CAs can be predicted by parallel circuits of depth O(log^2 t) using gates with binary inputs, or O(log t) depth if ``sum mod p'' gates with an unbounded number of inputs are allowed. Thus these CAs can be predicted by (idealized) parallel computers much faster than by explicit simulation, even though they are non-linear. This class includes any CA whose rule, when written as an algebra, is a solvable group. We also show that CAs based on nilpotent groups can be predicted in depth O(log t) or O(1) by circuits with binary or ``sum mod p'' gates respectively. We use these techniques to give an efficient algorithm for a CA rule which, like elementary CA rule 18, has diffusing defects that annihilate in pairs. This can be used to predict the motion of defects in rule 18 in O(log^2 t) parallel time.
patt-sol↗
Majority-Vote Cellular Automata, Ising Dynamics, and P-Completeness
We study cellular automata where the state at each site is decided by a majority vote of the sites in its neighborhood. These are equivalent, for a restricted set of initial conditions, to non-zero probability transitions in single spin-flip dynamics of the Ising model at zero temperature. We show that in three or more dimensions these systems can simulate Boolean circuits of AND and OR gates, and are therefore P-complete. That is, predicting their state t time-steps in the future is at least as hard as any other problem that takes polynomial time on a serial computer. Therefore, unless a widely believed conjecture in computer science is false, it is impossible even with parallel computation to predict majority-vote cellular automata, or zero-temperature single spin-flip Ising dynamics, qualitatively faster than by explicit simulation.
cond-mat.stat-mech↗