arXiv subjects

Csilla Bujtás

Publications and source records attributed to Csilla Bujtás.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2023

Computational complexity aspects of super domination

Let $G$ be a graph. A dominating set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is a super dominating set if for every vertex $x\in V(G) \setminus D$ there exists $y\in D$ such that $N_G(y)\cap (V(G)\setminus D)) = \{x\}$. The cardinality of a smallest super dominating set of $G$ is the super domination number of $G$. An exact formula for the super domination number of a tree $T$ is obtained and demonstrated that a smallest super dominating set of $T$ can be computed in linear time. It is proved that it is NP-complete to decide whether the super domination number of a graph $G$ is at most a given integer if $G$ is a bipartite graph of girth at least $8$. The super domination number is determined for all $k$-subdivisions of graphs. Interestingly, in half of the cases the exact value can be efficiently computed from the obtained formulas, while in the other cases the computation is hard. While obtaining these formulas, II-matching numbers are introduced and proved that they are computationally hard to determine.

math.CO↗

arXiv2022

Thresholds for the monochromatic clique transversal game

We study a recently introduced two-person combinatorial game, the $(a,b)$-monochromatic clique transversal game which is played by Alice and Bob on a graph $G$. As we observe, this game is equivalent to the $(b,a)$-biased Maker-Breaker game played on the clique-hypergraph of $G$. Our main results concern the threshold bias $a_1(G)$ that is the smallest integer $a$ such that Alice can win in the $(a,1)$-monochromatic clique transversal game on $G$ if she is the first to play. Among other results, we determine the possible values of $a_1(G)$ for the disjoint union of graphs, prove a formula for $a_1(G)$ if $G$ is triangle-free, and obtain the exact values of $a_1(C_n \,\square\, C_m)$, $a_1(C_n \,\square\, P_m)$, and $a_1(P_n \,\square\, P_m)$ for all possible pairs $(n,m)$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2022

Fast winning strategies for Staller in the Maker-Breaker domination game

The Maker-Breaker domination game is played on a graph $G$ by two players, called Dominator and Staller, who alternately choose a vertex that has not been played so far. Dominator wins the game if his moves form a dominating set. Staller wins if she plays all vertices from a closed neighborhood of a vertex $v \in V(G)$. Dominator's fast winning strategies were studied earlier. In this work, we concentrate on the cases when Staller has a winning strategy in the game. We introduce the invariant $γ'_{\rm SMB}(G)$ (resp., $γ_{\rm SMB}(G)$) which is the smallest integer $k$ such that, under any strategy of Dominator, Staller can win the game by playing at most $k$ vertices, if Staller (resp., Dominator) plays first on the graph $G$. We prove some basic properties of $γ_{\rm SMB}(G)$ and $γ'_{\rm SMB}(G)$ and study the parameters' changes under some operators as taking the disjoint union of graphs or deleting a cut vertex. We show that the inequality $δ(G)+1 \le γ'_{\rm SMB}(G) \le γ_{\rm SMB}(G)$ always holds and that for every three integers $r,s,t$ with $2\le r\le s\le t$, there exists a graph $G$ such that $δ(G)+1 = r$, $γ'_{\rm SMB}(G) = s$, and $γ_{\rm SMB}(G) = t$. We prove exact formulas for $γ'_{\rm SMB}(G)$ where $G$ is a path, or it is a tadpole graph which is obtained from the disjoint union of a cycle and a path by adding one edge between them.

math.CO↗

arXiv2021

Predominating a vertex in the connected domination game

The connected domination game is played just as the domination game, with an additional requirement that at each stage of the game the vertices played induce a connected subgraph. The number of moves in a D-game (an S-game, resp.) on a graph $G$ when both players play optimally is denoted by $γ_{\rm cg}(G)$ ($γ_{\rm cg}'(G)$, resp.). Connected Game Continuation Principle is established as a substitute for the classical Continuation Principle which does not hold for the connected domination game. Let $G|x$ denote the graph $G$ together with a declaration that the vertex $x$ is already dominated. The first main result asserts that if $G$ is a graph with $γ_{\rm cg}(G) \geq 3$ and $x \in V(G)$, then $γ_{\rm cg}(G|x) \leq 2 γ_{\rm cg}(G) - 3$ and the bound is sharp. The second main theorem states that if $G$ is a graph with $n(G) \geq 2$ and $x \in V(G)$, then $γ_{\rm cg}(G|x) \geq \left \lceil \frac12 γ_{\rm cg}(G) \right \rceil$ and the bound is sharp. Graphs $G$ and their vertices $x$ for which $γ_{\rm cg}'(G|x) = \infty$ holds are also characterized.

math.CO↗

arXiv2021

Optimal strategies in fractional games: vertex cover and domination

In a hypergraph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$, a real-valued function $f: V \to [0, 1]$ is a fractional transversal if $\sum_{v\in e} f(v) \ge 1$ for every edge $e \in E$. Its size is $|f| := \sum_{v \in V} f(v)$, and the fractional transversal number is the smallest possible $|f|$. We consider a game scenario where two players with opposite goals construct a fractional transversal incrementally, trying to minimize and maximize $|f|$, respectively. We prove that both players have strategies to achieve their common optimum, and they can reach their goals using rational weights.

math.CO↗

arXiv2021

The k-path vertex cover: general bounds and chordal graphs

For an integer $k\ge 3$, a $k$-path vertex cover of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a set $T\subseteq V$ that shares a vertex with every path subgraph of order $k$ in $G$. The minimum cardinality of a $k$-path vertex cover is denoted by $ψ_k(G)$. We give estimates -- mostly upper bounds -- on $ψ_k(G)$ in terms of various parameters, including vertex degrees and the number of vertices and edges. The problem is also considered on chordal graphs and planar graphs.

math.CO↗

arXiv2021

The domination game played on diameter 2 graphs

Let $γ_g(G)$ be the game domination number of a graph $G$. It is proved that if ${\rm diam}(G) = 2$, then $γ_g(G) \le \left\lceil \frac{n(G)}{2} \right\rceil- \left\lfloor \frac{n(G)}{11}\right\rfloor$. The bound is attained: if ${\rm diam}(G) = 2$ and $n(G) \le 10$, then $γ_g(G) = \left\lceil \frac{n(G)}{2} \right\rceil$ if and only if $G$ is one of seven sporadic graphs with $n(G)\le 6$ or the Petersen graph, and there are exactly ten graphs of diameter $2$ and order $11$ that attain the bound.

math.CO↗

arXiv2021

On the equality of domination number and $ 2 $-domination number

The 2-domination number $γ_2(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $ D \subseteq V(G) $ for which every vertex outside $ D $ is adjacent to at least two vertices in $ D $. Clearly, $ γ_2(G) $ cannot be smaller than the domination number $ γ(G) $. We consider a large class of graphs and characterize those members which satisfy $γ_2=γ$. For the general case, we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether $γ_2=γ$ holds. We also give a necessary and sufficient condition for a graph to satisfy the equality hereditarily.

math.CO↗

arXiv2020

$1/2$-conjectures on the domination game and claw-free graphs

Let $γ_g(G)$ be the game domination number of a graph $G$. Rall conjectured that if $G$ is a traceable graph, then $γ_g(G) \le \left\lceil \frac{1}{2}n(G)\right\rceil$. Our main result verifies the conjecture over the class of line graphs. Moreover, in this paper we put forward the conjecture that if $δ(G) \geq 2$, then $γ_g(G) \leq \left\lceil \frac{1}{2}n(G) \right\rceil$. We show that both conjectures hold true for claw-free cubic graphs. We further prove the upper bound $γ_g(G) \le \left\lceil \frac{11}{20} \, n(G) \right\rceil$ over the class of claw-free graphs of minimum degree at least $2$. Computer experiments supporting the new conjecture and sharpness examples are also presented.

math.CO↗

arXiv2020

Total connected domination game

The (total) connected domination game on a graph $G$ is played by two players, Dominator and Staller, according to the standard (total) domination game with the additional requirement that at each stage of the game the selected vertices induce a connected subgraph of $G$. If Dominator starts the game and both players play optimally, then the number of vertices selected during the game is the (total) connected game domination number ($γ_{\rm tcg}(G)$) $γ_{\rm cg}(G)$ of $G$. We show that $γ_{\rm tcg}(G)\in \{γ_{\rm cg}(G), γ_{\rm cg}(G) + 1, γ_{\rm cg}(G) + 2\}$, and consequently define $G$ as Class $i$ if $γ_{\rm tcg}(G) = γ_{\rm cg} + i$ for $i \in \{0,1,2\}$. A large family of Class $0$ graphs is constructed which contains all connected Cartesian product graphs and connected direct product graphs with minumum degree at least $2$. We show that no tree is Class $2$ and characterize Class $1$ trees. We provide an infinite family of Class $2$ bipartite graphs.

math.CO↗

arXiv2020

On Rall's $1/2$-conjecture on the domination game

The $1/2$-conjecture on the domination game asserts that if $G$ is a traceable graph, then the game domination number $γ_g(G)$ of $G$ is at most $\left\lceil \frac{n(G)}{2} \right\rceil$. A traceable graph is a $1/2$-graph if $γ_g(G) = \left\lceil \frac{n(G)}{2} \right\rceil$ holds. It is proved that the so-called hatted cycles are $1/2$-graphs and that unicyclic graphs fulfill the $1/2$-conjecture. Several additional families of graphs that support the conjecture are determined and computer experiments related to the conjecture described.

math.CO↗

arXiv2020

Bipartite graphs with close domination and k-domination numbers

Let $k$ be a positive integer and let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$. A subset $D \subseteq V(G)$ is a $k$-dominating set if every vertex outside $D$ is adjacent to at least $k$ vertices in $D$. The $k$-domination number $γ_k(G)$ is the minimum cardinality of a $k$-dominating set in $G$. For any graph $G$, we know that $γ_k(G) \geq γ(G)+k-2$ where $ Δ(G)\geq k\geq 2$ and this bound is sharp for every $k\geq 2$. In this paper, we characterize bipartite graphs satisfying the equality for $k\geq 3$ and present a necessary and sufficient condition for a bipartite graph to satisfy the equality hereditarily when $k=3$. We also prove that the problem of deciding whether a graph satisfies the given equality is NP-hard in general.

math.CO↗

arXiv2020

Domination number of graphs with minimum degree five

We prove that for every graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and with minimum degree five, the domination number $γ(G)$ cannot exceed $n/3$. The proof combines an algorithmic approach and the discharging method. Using the same technique, we provide a shorter proof for the known upper bound $4n/11$ on the domination number of graphs of minimum degree four.

math.CO↗

arXiv2020

On specific factors in graphs

It is well known that if $G = (V, E)$} is a multigraph and $X\subset V$ is a subset of even order, then $G$ contains a spanning forest $H$ such that each vertex from $X$ has an odd degree in $H$ and all the other vertices have an even degree in $H$. This spanning forest may have isolated vertices. If this is not allowed in $H$, then the situation is much more complicated. In this paper, we study this problem and generalize the concepts of even-factors and odd-factors in a unified form.

math.CO↗

arXiv2020

General upper bound on the game domination number

It is conjectured that the game domination number is at most $3n/5$ for every $n$-vertex graph which does not contain isolated vertices. It was proved in the recent years that the conjecture holds for several graph classes, including the class of forests and that of graphs with minimum degree at least two. Here we prove that the slightly bigger upper bound $5n/8$ is valid for every isolate-free graph.

math.CO↗

arXiv2019

Z-domination game

The Z-domination game is a variant of the domination game in which each newly selected vertex $u$ in the game must have a not yet dominated neighbor, but after the move all vertices from the closed neighborhood of $u$ are declared to be dominated. The Z-domination game is the fastest among the five natural domination games. The corresponding game Z-domination number of a graph $G$ is denoted by $γ_{Zg}(G)$. It is proved that the game domination number and the game total domination number of a graph can be expressed as the game Z-domination number of appropriate lexicographic products. Graphs with a Z-insensitive property are introduced and it is proved that if $G$ is Z-insensitive, then $γ_{Zg}(G)$ is equal to the game domination number of $G$. Weakly claw-free graphs are defined and proved to be Z-insensitive. As a consequence, $γ_{Zg}(P_n)$ is determined, thus sharpening an earlier related approximate result. It is proved that if $γ_{Zg}(G)$ is an even number, then $γ_{Zg}(G)$ is strictly smaller than the game L-domination number. On the other hand, families of graphs are constructed for which all five game domination numbers coincide. Graphs $G$ with $γ_{Zg}(G) = γ(G)$ are also considered and computational results which compare the studied invariants in the class of trees on at most $16$ vertices reported.

math.CO↗

arXiv2019

Perfect graphs for domination games

Let $γ_g(G)$ and $γ_{tg}(G)$ be the game domination number and the total game domination number of a graph $G$, respectively. Then $G$ is $γ_g$-perfect (resp. $γ_{tg}$-perfect), if every induced subgraph $F$ of $G$ satisfies $γ_g(F)=γ(F)$ (resp. $γ_{tg}(F)=γ_t(F)$). A recursive characterization of $γ_g$-perfect graphs is derived. The characterization yields a polynomial recognition algorithm for $γ_g$-perfect graphs. It is proved that every minimally $γ_g$-imperfect graph has domination number $2$. All minimally $γ_g$-imperfect triangle-free graphs are determined. It is also proved that $γ_{tg}$-perfect graphs are precisely $\overline{2P_3}$-free cographs.

math.CO↗

arXiv2018

The variety of domination games

Domination game [SIAM J.\ Discrete Math.\ 24 (2010) 979--991] and total domination game [Graphs Combin.\ 31 (2015) 1453--1462] are by now well established games played on graphs by two players, named Dominator and Staller. In this paper, Z-domination game, L-domination game, and LL-domination game are introduced as natural companions of the standard domination games. Versions of the Continuation Principle are proved for the new games. It is proved that in each of these games the outcome of the game, which is a corresponding graph invariant, differs by at most one depending whether Dominator or Staller starts the game. The hierarchy of the five domination games is established. The invariants are also bounded with respect to the (total) domination number and to the order of a graph. Values of the three new invariants are determined for paths up to a small constant independent from the length of a path. Several open problems and a conjecture are listed. The latter asserts that the L-domination game number is not greater than $6/7$ of the order of a graph.

math.CO↗