arXiv subjects

Cynthia Richey

Publications and source records attributed to Cynthia Richey.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

When Double Rounding is Correct

Number libraries, which implement number formats and their arithmetic in software, are used to simulate hardware, making hardware behavior reproducible and thus verifiable and easier to design. However, modern machine learning accelerators are difficult to simulate, as they increasingly use specialized number formats that existing number libraries do not support. It is costly to extend these libraries using traditional methods: each combination of operation, format, and rounding mode typically requires a bespoke implementation. An easier way is to double round - compute at higher precision, then re-round - so that one high-precision kernel serves many formats, but double rounding is only known to be correct in select cases. We give a precise, efficiently checkable characterization of when double rounding is correct across many formats and rounding modes. Our result rests on a novel abstract number format that unifies fixed- and floating-point representations, reducing the correctness of double rounding to format containment: whether every value of one format is representable in another. We mechanized these results in Lean 4. In addition, we introduce a format inference algorithm that, given a sequence of operations, bounds each expression by a number format guaranteed to contain its result. We apply these insights in two ways. First, we present MPFX, a correctly-rounded, multi-precision number library that exploits correct double rounding to efficiently simulate many number formats. MPFX's correctly-rounded operations are up to 11x (mean: 6.05x) faster than MPFR's, and competitive with SoftFloat's - between 0.46x and 1.63x as fast (mean: 0.94x) - at the same precision. Second, in a case study, we implement a software simulation of a hardware specification using both SoftFloat and MPFX's primitives; the MPFX version is up to 13.5x faster.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2026

Equality saturation theory exploration à la carte

Rewrite rules are critical in equality saturation, an increasingly popular technique in optimizing compilers, synthesizers, and verifiers. Unfortunately, developing high-quality rulesets is difficult and error-prone. Recent work to automatically infer rewrite rules does not scale to large terms or grammars. Users struggle to guide inference and incrementally construct rulesets because existing rule inference tools are monolithic and opaque. As a result, most equality saturation users still manually develop and maintain rulesets. This paper proposes Enumo, a new domain-specific language for programmable theory exploration. Enumo provides a small set of core operators that enable users to strategically guide rule inference and incrementally build rulesets. Short Enumo programs easily replicate results from state-of-the-art tools like Ruler, but Enumo programs can also scale to infer deeper rules from larger grammars than prior approaches. Enumo's composable operators even facilitate developing new strategies for ruleset inference. We introduce a new fast-forwarding strategy which does not require evaluating terms in the target language, and thus supports domains that were out of scope for prior work. Enumo is also easy to extend: two new operators suffice to incorporate large language models into rule inference, where they complement guided search. We evaluate Enumo and fast-forwarding across a variety of domains. Compared to state-of-the-art techniques, Enumo can synthesize better rulesets over a diverse set of domains, in some cases matching the effects of manually developed rulesets in systems driven by equality saturation.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2026

Fail Faster: Staging and Fast Randomness for High-Performance PBT

Property-based testing (PBT) relies on generators for random test cases, often constructed using embedded domain specific languages, which provide expressive combinators for building and composing generators. The effectiveness of PBT depends critically on the speed of these generators. However, careful measurements show that the generator performance of widely used PBT libraries falls well short of what is possible, due principally to (1) the abstraction overhead of their combinator-heavy style and (2) suboptimal sources of randomness. We characterize, quantify, and address these bottlenecks. To eliminate abstraction overheads, we propose a technique based on multi-stage programming, dubbed Allegro. We apply this technique to leading generator libraries in OCaml and Scala 3, significantly improving performance. To quantify the performance impact of the randomness source, we carry out a controlled experiment, replacing the randomness in the OCaml PBT library with an optimized version. Both interventions exactly preserve the semantics of generators, enabling precise, pointwise comparisons. Together, these improvements find bugs up to $13\times$ faster.

cs.PL↗