Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Dániel Gábor Simon

Publications and source records attributed to Dániel Gábor Simon.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Peeling sequences: a directional method for the three-block construction

A \emph{peeling sequence} of a finite planar point set is an ordering of point removals, in which each point is a vertex of the convex hull of the points not yet removed. Write $g(S)$ for the number of such sequences, and $g(n)$ for the minimum of $g(S)$ over $n$-point sets in general position. We present a method which can be used to prove better upper bounds on the previously analysed recursive 3-branch constructions $S_n$. In fact, we prove $g(n)\leq g(S_n)=O(6.57^n)$, using directional restrictions and a weighted prefix-tree argument.

math.CO↗

Further analysis of Peeling Sequences

Let $P\subset \R^2$ be a set of $n$ points in general position. A peeling sequence of $P$ is a list of its points, such that if we remove the points from $P$ in that order, we always remove the next point from the convex hull of the remainder of $P$. Using the methodology of Dumitrescu and Tóth \cite{Dumitrescu}, with a more careful analysis, we improve the upper bound on the minimum number of peeling sequences for an $n$ point set in the plane from $12.29^n/100$ to $9.78^n/500$.

math.CO↗

The minimum number of peeling sequences of a point set

Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, in general position. We remove all of them one by one, in each step erasing one vertex of the convex hull of the current remaining set. Let $g_d(P)$ denote the number of different removal orders we can attain while erasing all points of $P$ this way, and let $g_d(n)$ be the \emph{minimum} of $g_d(P)$ over all $n$-element point sets $P\subset \mathbb{R}^d$. Dumitrescu and Tóth showed that $g_d(n)=(d+1)^{(d+1)^2n}$. We substantially improve their bound, by proving that $g_d(n)= O((d+d\ln{(d)})^{(2+\frac{(d-1)}{\lfloor d\ln{d}\rfloor})n})$. It follows that, for any $ε>0$, there exist sufficiently high dimensional point sets $P\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ with $g_d(P)\leq O(d^{(2+ε)n})$. This almost closes the gap between the upper bound and the best-known lower bound $(d+1)^n$ for large values of $d$.

math.CO↗

Maximal line-free sets in $\mathbb{F}_p^n$

We study subsets of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ that do not contain progressions of length $k$. We denote by $r_k(\mathbb{F}_p^n)$ the cardinality of such subsets containing a maximal number of elements. In this paper we focus on the case $k=p$ and therefore sets containing no full line. A~trivial lower bound $r_p(\mathbb{F}_p^n)\geq(p-1)^n$ is achieved by a hypercube of side length $p-1$ and it is known that equality holds for $n\in\{1,2\}$. We will however show that $r_p(\mathbb{F}_p^3)\geq (p-1)^3+p-2\sqrt{p}$, which is the first improvement in the three dimensional case that is increasing in $p$. We will also give the upper bound $r_p(\mathbb{F}_p^{3})\leq p^3-2p^2-(\sqrt{2}-1)p+2$ as well as generalizations for higher dimensions. Finally we present some bounds for individual $p$ and $n$, in particular $r_5(\mathbb{F}_5^{3})\geq 70$ and $r_7(\mathbb{F}_7^{3})\geq 225$ which can be used to give the asymptotic lower bound $4.121^n$ for $r_5(\mathbb{F}_5^{n})$ and $6.082^n$ for $r_7(\mathbb{F}_7^{n})$.

math.CO↗