arXiv subjects

Daiqiang Li

Publications and source records attributed to Daiqiang Li.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Where and How to Prune: An Empirical Study of Visual Token Pruning for GUI Agent Navigation

In recent years, GUI agents have demonstrated strong potential in navigation tasks. However, preserving complete historical screenshots introduces substantial computational overhead. This paper investigates how token pruning, a plug-and-play inference acceleration technique, can be effectively applied to GUI agent navigation scenarios. Firstly, we address the question of where pruning should occur. We identify a system-level redundancy overlooked by existing methods: as the same screenshot is repeatedly fed into the model across different steps, its ViT encoding is redundantly recomputed each time. We show that its ViT-encoded embeddings can be fully cached and reused across steps, substantially reducing FLOPs while preserving model performance. This finding suggests that inference acceleration efforts should focus on the subsequent Large Language Model (LLM). Building on this, we further address the question of how to prune within the LLM, and distill two key insights: (i) from a semantic perspective, the token budget should be balanced between foreground and background regions; (ii) from a spatial perspective, the spatial uniformity of retained tokens should be maintained to preserve the model's global spatial perception. These findings provide practical guidance for the design of inference acceleration and token pruning for GUI agent navigation.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

EpochX: Building the Infrastructure for an Emergent Agent Civilization

General-purpose technologies reshape economies less by improving individual tools than by enabling new ways to organize production and coordination. We believe AI agents are approaching a similar inflection point: as foundation models make broad task execution and tool use increasingly accessible, the binding constraint shifts from raw capability to how work is delegated, verified, and rewarded at scale. We introduce EpochX, a credits-native marketplace infrastructure for human-agent production networks. EpochX treats humans and agents as peer participants who can post tasks or claim them. Claimed tasks can be decomposed into subtasks and executed through an explicit delivery workflow with verification and acceptance. Crucially, EpochX is designed so that each completed transaction can produce reusable ecosystem assets, including skills, workflows, execution traces, and distilled experience. These assets are stored with explicit dependency structure, enabling retrieval, composition, and cumulative improvement over time. EpochX also introduces a native credit mechanism to make participation economically viable under real compute costs. Credits lock task bounties, budget delegation, settle rewards upon acceptance, and compensate creators when verified assets are reused. By formalizing the end-to-end transaction model together with its asset and incentive layers, EpochX reframes agentic AI as an organizational design problem: building infrastructures where verifiable work leaves persistent, reusable artifacts, and where value flows support durable human-agent collaboration.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2020

Deep Learning Methods for Lung Cancer Segmentation in Whole-slide Histopathology Images -- the ACDC@LungHP Challenge 2019

Accurate segmentation of lung cancer in pathology slides is a critical step in improving patient care. We proposed the ACDC@LungHP (Automatic Cancer Detection and Classification in Whole-slide Lung Histopathology) challenge for evaluating different computer-aided diagnosis (CADs) methods on the automatic diagnosis of lung cancer. The ACDC@LungHP 2019 focused on segmentation (pixel-wise detection) of cancer tissue in whole slide imaging (WSI), using an annotated dataset of 150 training images and 50 test images from 200 patients. This paper reviews this challenge and summarizes the top 10 submitted methods for lung cancer segmentation. All methods were evaluated using the false positive rate, false negative rate, and DICE coefficient (DC). The DC ranged from 0.7354$\pm$0.1149 to 0.8372$\pm$0.0858. The DC of the best method was close to the inter-observer agreement (0.8398$\pm$0.0890). All methods were based on deep learning and categorized into two groups: multi-model method and single model method. In general, multi-model methods were significantly better ($\textit{p}$<$0.01$) than single model methods, with mean DC of 0.7966 and 0.7544, respectively. Deep learning based methods could potentially help pathologists find suspicious regions for further analysis of lung cancer in WSI.

eess.IV↗