arXiv subjects

Dalibor Stevanovic

Publications and source records attributed to Dalibor Stevanovic.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Monetary Policy in the Media Spotlight: Sentiments, Signals, and Economic Impact

News media coverage of monetary policy is not a passive transcript of central-bank communication: it filters announcements, macroeconomic news, and editorial choices into narratives that move expectations and policy decisions. We embed media sentiment into a behavioral New-Keynesian model in which the central bank reacts to sentiment and sentiment follows an explicit law of motion. We construct monetary-policy sentiment indicators from more than 50,000 Canadian newspaper articles using dictionary methods, transformer models, and a generative-AI framework. Media sentiment shifts household inflation and wage expectations, improves out-of-sample forecasts of GDP growth and inflation, and loads positively on the Bank of Canada's estimated Taylor rule once treated as endogenous. A Bayesian SVAR identifies anticipated and unanticipated monetary-policy shocks together with a narrative shock; the narrative shock contributes a non-trivial share of medium-horizon macroeconomic variance, and a counterfactual that shuts down the dynamic feedback from media sentiment attenuates the propagation of monetary policy to output and prices. %The results suggest that media narratives are an integral part of monetary-policy transmission, not merely an additional source of information.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Who Saw It Coming? Historical Experience and the 2021 Inflation Forecast Failure

This paper studies the 2021 U.S. inflation forecasting failure. I show that the failure was primarily driven by sample composition rather than functional-form misspecification: estimation samples dominated by the Great Moderation underweight supply-shock regimes, and expectations anchored to that regime were slow to recognize the shift. Three historically informed adjustments, an intercept correction, a similarity re-estimation on 1970s data, and a kernel-weighted estimator, substantially close the forecast gap, and the gains extend to eight additional U.S. price indices. Household survey respondents over 60, whose lifetime includes the 1970s, reported higher inflation expectations from early 2021, consistent with experience-based learning; younger cohorts remained anchored to the prevailing regime. A controlled experiment with large language models conditioned on ``experienced'' and ``young'' professional personas confirms that experiential priors generate significant forecast differences under a common training leakage assumption. Across all three exercises, the source of the prior mattered more than the sophistication of the model.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2021

Macroeconomic Data Transformations Matter

In a low-dimensional linear regression setup, considering linear transformations/combinations of predictors does not alter predictions. However, when the forecasting technology either uses shrinkage or is nonlinear, it does. This is precisely the fabric of the machine learning (ML) macroeconomic forecasting environment. Pre-processing of the data translates to an alteration of the regularization -- explicit or implicit -- embedded in ML algorithms. We review old transformations and propose new ones, then empirically evaluate their merits in a substantial pseudo-out-sample exercise. It is found that traditional factors should almost always be included as predictors and moving average rotations of the data can provide important gains for various forecasting targets. Also, we note that while predicting directly the average growth rate is equivalent to averaging separate horizon forecasts when using OLS-based techniques, the latter can substantially improve on the former when regularization and/or nonparametric nonlinearities are involved.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2021

Can Machine Learning Catch the COVID-19 Recession?

Based on evidence gathered from a newly built large macroeconomic data set for the UK, labeled UK-MD and comparable to similar datasets for the US and Canada, it seems the most promising avenue for forecasting during the pandemic is to allow for general forms of nonlinearity by using machine learning (ML) methods. But not all nonlinear ML methods are alike. For instance, some do not allow to extrapolate (like regular trees and forests) and some do (when complemented with linear dynamic components). This and other crucial aspects of ML-based forecasting in unprecedented times are studied in an extensive pseudo-out-of-sample exercise.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2020

How is Machine Learning Useful for Macroeconomic Forecasting?

We move beyond "Is Machine Learning Useful for Macroeconomic Forecasting?" by adding the "how". The current forecasting literature has focused on matching specific variables and horizons with a particularly successful algorithm. In contrast, we study the usefulness of the underlying features driving ML gains over standard macroeconometric methods. We distinguish four so-called features (nonlinearities, regularization, cross-validation and alternative loss function) and study their behavior in both the data-rich and data-poor environments. To do so, we design experiments that allow to identify the "treatment" effects of interest. We conclude that (i) nonlinearity is the true game changer for macroeconomic prediction, (ii) the standard factor model remains the best regularization, (iii) K-fold cross-validation is the best practice and (iv) the $L_2$ is preferred to the $\bar ε$-insensitive in-sample loss. The forecasting gains of nonlinear techniques are associated with high macroeconomic uncertainty, financial stress and housing bubble bursts. This suggests that Machine Learning is useful for macroeconomic forecasting by mostly capturing important nonlinearities that arise in the context of uncertainty and financial frictions.

econ.EM↗