arXiv subjects

Damiano Carra

Publications and source records attributed to Damiano Carra.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

XAI2CSI: Interpreting CSI with eXplainable AI for Human Activity Recognition

Wi-Fi Channel State Information (CSI) has emerged as a key enabler for device-free Human Activity Recognition (HAR), enabling low-cost, unobtrusive sensing using existing communication infrastructure. However, Deep Learning (DL) models trained on CSI data often struggle to generalize across users, environments, and device setups due to the context sensitivity of wireless propagation. Despite this challenge, limited attention has been devoted to understanding model decisions and generalization failures. This paper introduces XAI2CSI, a framework that leverages eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to analyze DL-based CSI sensing systems. XAI2CSI employs SAGE, a model-agnostic explainability method, to quantify temporal, spectral, and spatial CSI contributions to HAR decisions under nominal and cross-context evaluations on IEEE 802.11ax data. Our analysis reveals that the considered DL model exhibits limited robustness to unseen conditions due to an over-reliance on context-specific CSI patterns, causing models to misinterpret the underlying signal dynamics when deployment conditions change. The proposed methodology and findings provide a reference framework to explore alternative solutions and guide the development of robust, transparent Wi-Fi sensing systems.

eess.SP↗

arXiv2024

An Online Gradient-Based Caching Policy with Logarithmic Complexity and Regret Guarantees

Commonly used caching policies, such as LRU (Least Recently Used) or LFU (Least Frequently Used), exhibit optimal performance only under specific traffic patterns. Even advanced machine learning-based methods, which detect patterns in historical request data, struggle when future requests deviate from past trends. Recently, a new class of policies has emerged that are robust to varying traffic patterns. These algorithms address an online optimization problem, enabling continuous adaptation to the context. They offer theoretical guarantees on the regret metric, which measures the performance gap between the online policy and the optimal static cache allocation in hindsight. However, the high computational complexity of these solutions hinders their practical adoption. In this study, we introduce a new variant of the gradient-based online caching policy that achieves groundbreaking logarithmic computational complexity relative to catalog size, while also providing regret guarantees. This advancement allows us to test the policy on large-scale, real-world traces featuring millions of requests and items - a significant achievement, as such scales have been beyond the reach of existing policies with regret guarantees. To the best of our knowledge, our experimental results demonstrate for the first time that the regret guarantees of gradient-based caching policies offer substantial benefits in practical scenarios.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2022

I-SPLIT: Deep Network Interpretability for Split Computing

This work makes a substantial step in the field of split computing, i.e., how to split a deep neural network to host its early part on an embedded device and the rest on a server. So far, potential split locations have been identified exploiting uniquely architectural aspects, i.e., based on the layer sizes. Under this paradigm, the efficacy of the split in terms of accuracy can be evaluated only after having performed the split and retrained the entire pipeline, making an exhaustive evaluation of all the plausible splitting points prohibitive in terms of time. Here we show that not only the architecture of the layers does matter, but the importance of the neurons contained therein too. A neuron is important if its gradient with respect to the correct class decision is high. It follows that a split should be applied right after a layer with a high density of important neurons, in order to preserve the information flowing until then. Upon this idea, we propose Interpretable Split (I-SPLIT): a procedure that identifies the most suitable splitting points by providing a reliable prediction on how well this split will perform in terms of classification accuracy, beforehand of its effective implementation. As a further major contribution of I-SPLIT, we show that the best choice for the splitting point on a multiclass categorization problem depends also on which specific classes the network has to deal with. Exhaustive experiments have been carried out on two networks, VGG16 and ResNet-50, and three datasets, Tiny-Imagenet-200, notMNIST, and Chest X-Ray Pneumonia. The source code is available at https://github.com/vips4/I-Split.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2018

A Data-Driven Approach to Dynamically Adjust Resource Allocation for Compute Clusters

Nowadays, data-centers are largely under-utilized because resource allocation is based on reservation mechanisms which ignore actual resource utilization. Indeed, it is common to reserve resources for peak demand, which may occur only for a small portion of the application life time. As a consequence, cluster resources often go under-utilized. In this work, we propose a mechanism that improves cluster utilization, thus decreasing the average turnaround time, while preventing application failures due to contention in accessing finite resources such as RAM. Our approach monitors resource utilization and employs a data-driven approach to resource demand forecasting, featuring quantification of uncertainty in the predictions. Using demand forecast and its confidence, our mechanism modulates cluster resources assigned to running applications, and reduces the turnaround time by more than one order of magnitude while keeping application failures under control. Thus, tenants enjoy a responsive system and providers benefit from an efficient cluster utilization.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2018

Cache-based Multi-query Optimization for Data-intensive Scalable Computing Frameworks

In modern large-scale distributed systems, analytics jobs submitted by various users often share similar work, for example scanning and processing the same subset of data. Instead of optimizing jobs independently, which may result in redundant and wasteful processing, multi-query optimization techniques can be employed to save a considerable amount of cluster resources. In this work, we introduce a novel method combining in-memory cache primitives and multi-query optimization, to improve the efficiency of data-intensive, scalable computing frameworks. By careful selection and exploitation of common (sub)expressions, while satisfying memory constraints, our method transforms a batch of queries into a new, more efficient one which avoids unnecessary recomputations. To find feasible and efficient execution plans, our method uses a cost-based optimization formulation akin to the multiple-choice knapsack problem. Extensive experiments on a prototype implementation of our system show significant benefits of worksharing for both TPC-DS workloads and detailed micro-benchmarks.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2018

Elastic Provisioning of Cloud Caches: a Cost-aware TTL Approach

We consider elastic resource provisioning in the cloud, focusing on in-memory key-value stores used as caches. Our goal is to dynamically scale resources to the traffic pattern minimizing the overall cost, which includes not only the storage cost, but also the cost due to misses. In fact, a small variation on the cache miss ratio may have a significant impact on user perceived performance in modern web services, which in turn has an impact on the overall revenues for the content provider that uses those services. We propose and study a dynamic algorithm for TTL caches, which is able to obtain close-to-minimal costs. Since high-throughput caches require low complexity operations, we discuss a practical implementation of such a scheme requiring constant overhead per request independently from the cache size. We evaluate our solution with real-world traces collected from Akamai, and show that we are able to obtain a 17% decrease in the overall cost compared to a baseline static configuration.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2017

Experimental Performance Evaluation of Cloud-Based Analytics-as-a-Service

An increasing number of Analytics-as-a-Service solutions has recently seen the light, in the landscape of cloud-based services. These services allow flexible composition of compute and storage components, that create powerful data ingestion and processing pipelines. This work is a first attempt at an experimental evaluation of analytic application performance executed using a wide range of storage service configurations. We present an intuitive notion of data locality, that we use as a proxy to rank different service compositions in terms of expected performance. Through an empirical analysis, we dissect the performance achieved by analytic workloads and unveil problems due to the impedance mismatch that arise in some configurations. Our work paves the way to a better understanding of modern cloud-based analytic services and their performance, both for its end-users and their providers.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2016

Flexible Scheduling of Distributed Analytic Applications

This work addresses the problem of scheduling user-defined analytic applications, which we define as high-level compositions of frameworks, their components, and the logic necessary to carry out work. The key idea in our application definition, is to distinguish classes of components, including rigid and elastic types: the first being required for an application to make progress, the latter contributing to reduced execution times. We show that the problem of scheduling such applications poses new challenges, which existing approaches address inefficiently. Thus, we present the design and evaluation of a novel, flexible heuristic to schedule analytic applications, that aims at high system responsiveness, by allocating resources efficiently. Our algorithm is evaluated using trace-driven simulations, with large-scale real system traces: our flexible scheduler outperforms a baseline approach across a variety of metrics, including application turnaround times, and resource allocation efficiency. We also present the design and evaluation of a full-fledged system, which we have called Zoe, that incorporates the ideas presented in this paper, and report concrete improvements in terms of efficiency and performance, with respect to prior generations of our system.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2015

PSBS: Practical Size-Based Scheduling

Size-based schedulers have very desirable performance properties: optimal or near-optimal response time can be coupled with strong fairness guarantees. Despite this, such systems are very rarely implemented in practical settings, because they require knowing a priori the amount of work needed to complete jobs: this assumption is very difficult to satisfy in concrete systems. It is definitely more likely to inform the system with an estimate of the job sizes, but existing studies point to somewhat pessimistic results if existing scheduler policies are used based on imprecise job size estimations. We take the goal of designing scheduling policies that are explicitly designed to deal with inexact job sizes: first, we show that existing size-based schedulers can have bad performance with inexact job size information when job sizes are heavily skewed; we show that this issue, and the pessimistic results shown in the literature, are due to problematic behavior when large jobs are underestimated. Once the problem is identified, it is possible to amend existing size-based schedulers to solve the issue. We generalize FSP -- a fair and efficient size-based scheduling policy -- in order to solve the problem highlighted above; in addition, our solution deals with different job weights (that can be assigned to a job independently from its size). We provide an efficient implementation of the resulting protocol, which we call Practical Size-Based Scheduler (PSBS). Through simulations evaluated on synthetic and real workloads, we show that PSBS has near-optimal performance in a large variety of cases with inaccurate size information, that it performs fairly and it handles correctly job weights. We believe that this work shows that PSBS is indeed pratical, and we maintain that it could inspire the design of schedulers in a wide array of real-world use cases.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2015

On Fair Size-Based Scheduling

By executing jobs serially rather than in parallel, size-based scheduling policies can shorten time needed to complete jobs; however, major obstacles to their applicability are fairness guarantees and the fact that job sizes are rarely known exactly a-priori. Here, we introduce the Pri family of size-based scheduling policies; Pri simulates any reference scheduler and executes jobs in the order of their simulated completion: we show that these schedulers give strong fairness guarantees, since no job completes later in Pri than in the reference policy. In addition, we introduce PSBS, a practical implementation of such a scheduler: it works online (i.e., without needing knowledge of jobs submitted in the future), it has an efficient O(log n) implementation and it allows setting priorities to jobs. Most importantly, unlike earlier size-based policies, the performance of PSBS degrades gracefully with errors, leading to performances that are close to optimal in a variety of realistic use cases.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Revisiting Size-Based Scheduling with Estimated Job Sizes

We study size-based schedulers, and focus on the impact of inaccurate job size information on response time and fairness. Our intent is to revisit previous results, which allude to performance degradation for even small errors on job size estimates, thus limiting the applicability of size-based schedulers. We show that scheduling performance is tightly connected to workload characteristics: in the absence of large skew in the job size distribution, even extremely imprecise estimates suffice to outperform size-oblivious disciplines. Instead, when job sizes are heavily skewed, known size-based disciplines suffer. In this context, we show -- for the first time -- the dichotomy of over-estimation versus under-estimation. The former is, in general, less problematic than the latter, as its effects are localized to individual jobs. Instead, under-estimation leads to severe problems that may affect a large number of jobs. We present an approach to mitigate these problems: our technique requires no complex modifications to original scheduling policies and performs very well. To support our claim, we proceed with a simulation-based evaluation that covers an unprecedented large parameter space, which takes into account a variety of synthetic and real workloads. As a consequence, we show that size-based scheduling is practical and outperforms alternatives in a wide array of use-cases, even in presence of inaccurate size information.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2013

Practical Size-based Scheduling for MapReduce Workloads

We present the Hadoop Fair Sojourn Protocol (HFSP) scheduler, which implements a size-based scheduling discipline for Hadoop. The benefits of size-based scheduling disciplines are well recognized in a variety of contexts (computer networks, operating systems, etc...), yet, their practical implementation for a system such as Hadoop raises a number of important challenges. With HFSP, which is available as an open-source project, we address issues related to job size estimation, resource management and study the effects of a variety of preemption strategies. Although the architecture underlying HFSP is suitable for any size-based scheduling discipline, in this work we revisit and extend the Fair Sojourn Protocol, which solves problems related to job starvation that affect FIFO, Processor Sharing and a range of size-based disciplines. Our experiments, in which we compare HFSP to standard Hadoop schedulers, pinpoint at a significant decrease in average job sojourn times - a metric that accounts for the total time a job spends in the system, including waiting and serving times - for realistic workloads that we generate according to production traces available in literature.

cs.DC↗