arXiv subjects

Daniel Andrés Arcones

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Andrés Arcones.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Embedding Model-form Uncertainty in Probabilistic Calibration of Digital Twins for Bridges

Digital twins of bridges rely on physics-based models to infer full-field structural responses from sparse monitoring data. The reliability of these predictions depends on the calibration of model parameters while accounting for discrepancies between the model and the physical system. Such discrepancies, commonly referred to as model-form uncertainty (MFU), arise from simplifying assumptions and incomplete representations of physical processes, and can substantially affect predictive reliability. Explicitly quantifying MFU during calibration is therefore essential for trustworthy digital-twin predictions. This work presents a calibration framework that explicitly represents MFU through stochastic parameter embedding. The framework is demonstrated using a simplified two-dimensional cross-sectional thermal model of the Nibelungenbrücke calibrated against temperature measurements from its monitoring system. By explicitly accounting for MFU, the proposed methodology enables computationally efficient models to be reliably employed within digital-twin environments while maintaining predictive credibility. The framework introduces a three-step calibration strategy that progressively addresses sources of discrepancy while maintaining a clear distinction between identified uncertainties. Variance decomposition is used to characterize the structure of predictive uncertainty and its propagation to quantities of interest. Remaining discrepancies between predictive distributions and observations are quantified using Kolmogorov-Smirnov metrics to assess predictive consistency across seasonal conditions. The results demonstrate that explicitly accounting for MFU improves the interpretability and reliability of predictive uncertainties and validate the methodology for calibration of physics-based models supporting digital twins in structural health monitoring.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2026

Bayesian Tendon Breakage Localization under Model Uncertainty Using Distributed Fiber Optic Sensors

This study develops a Bayesian, uncertainty-aware framework for tendon breakage localization in pre-stressed concrete members using high-resolution data from distributed fiber-optic sensors (DFOS). DFOS enable full-field monitoring of strain changes on the surface of pre-stressed concrete members due to such failure. A finite element model (FEM) of an experimental tendon-breakage test is constructed, and model parameters are calibrated probabilistically against DFOS measurements. To capture model-form uncertainty (MFU), stochastic perturbations are embedded directly into material parameters, enabling the joint inference of physical properties and MFU within a unified probabilistic framework. Gaussian Process surrogates are employed to efficiently emulate the nonlinear FEM response, supporting computationally tractable Bayesian inference. A $ϕ$-divergence-based influence analysis identifies the DFOS measurements that most strongly shape the posterior distributions, providing interpretable diagnostics of sensor informativeness and model adequacy. The calibrated parameters and embedded uncertainties are then transferred to a FEM of a full-scale structural configuration, enabling prediction of tendon breakage localization under realistic conditions. A separability analysis of the predictive strain distributions quantifies the identifiability of tendon breakage at varying depths, assessing the confidence with which different damage scenarios can be distinguished given the propagated uncertainties. Results demonstrate that the framework achieves robust parameter calibration, interpretable diagnostics, and uncertainty-informed damage detection, integrating experimental data, embedded MFU, and probabilistic modeling. By systematically propagating both experimental and model uncertainties, the approach supports reliable tendon breakage localization and optimal DFOS placement.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2026

Gaussian mixture models for model improvement

Modeling complex physical systems such as they arise in civil engineering applications requires finding a trade-off between physical fidelity and practicality. Consequently, deviations of simulation from measurements are ubiquitous even after model calibration due to the model discrepancy, which may result from deliberate modeling decisions, ignorance, or lack of knowledge. If the mismatch between simulation and measurements are deemed unacceptable, the model has to be improved. Targeted model improvement is challenging due to a non-local impact of model discrepancies on measurements and the dependence on sensor configurations. Many approaches to model improvement, such as Bayesian calibration with additive mismatch terms, gray-box models, symbolic regression, or stochastic model updating, often lack interpretability, generalizability, physical consistency, or practical applicability. This paper introduces a non-intrusive approach to model discrepancy analysis using mixture models. Instead of directly modifying the model structure, the method maps sensor readings to clusters of physically meaningful parameters, automatically assigning sensor readings to parameter vector clusters. This mapping can reveal systematic discrepancies and model biases, guiding targeted, physics-based refinements by the modeler. The approach is formulated within a Bayesian framework, enabling the identification of parameter clusters and their assignments via the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. The methodology is demonstrated through numerical experiments, including an illustrative example and a real-world case study of heat transfer in a concrete bridge.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2025

Embedded Model Form Uncertainty Quantification with Measurement Noise for Bayesian Model Calibration

A key factor in ensuring the accuracy of computer simulations that model physical systems is the proper calibration of their parameters based on real-world observations or experimental data. Inevitably, uncertainties arise, and Bayesian methods provide a robust framework for quantifying and propagating these uncertainties to model predictions. Nevertheless, Bayesian methods paired with inexact models usually produce predictions unable to represent the observed datapoints. Additionally, the quantified uncertainties of these overconfident models cannot be propagated to other Quantities of Interest (QoIs) reliably. A promising solution involves embedding a model inadequacy term in the inference parameters, allowing the quantified model form uncertainty to influence non-observed QoIs. This paper introduces a more interpretable framework for embedding the model inadequacy compared to existing methods. To overcome the limitations of current approaches, we adapt the existing likelihood models to properly account for noise in the measurements and propose two new formulations designed to address their shortcomings. Moreover, we evaluate the performance of this inadequacy-embedding approach in the presence of discrepancies between measurements and model predictions, including noise and outliers. Particular attention is given to how the uncertainty associated with the model inadequacy term propagates to the QoIs, enabling a more comprehensive statistical analysis of prediction's reliability. Finally, the proposed approach is applied to estimate the uncertainty in the predicted heat flux from a transient thermal simulation using temperature observations.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2024

Model bias identification for Bayesian calibration of stochastic digital twins of bridges

Simulation-based digital twins must provide accurate, robust and reliable digital representations of their physical counterparts. Quantifying the uncertainty in their predictions plays, therefore, a key role in making better-informed decisions that impact the actual system. The update of the simulation model based on data must be then carefully implemented. When applied to complex standing structures such as bridges, discrepancies between the computational model and the real system appear as model bias, which hinders the trustworthiness of the digital twin and increases its uncertainty. Classical Bayesian updating approaches aiming to infer the model parameters often fail at compensating for such model bias, leading to overconfident and unreliable predictions. In this paper, two alternative model bias identification approaches are evaluated in the context of their applicability to digital twins of bridges. A modularized version of Kennedy and O'Hagan's approach and another one based on Orthogonal Gaussian Processes are compared with the classical Bayesian inference framework in a set of representative benchmarks. Additionally, two novel extensions are proposed for such models: the inclusion of noise-aware kernels and the introduction of additional variables not present in the computational model through the bias term. The integration of such approaches in the digital twin corrects the predictions, quantifies their uncertainty, estimates noise from unknown physical sources of error and provides further insight into the system by including additional pre-existing information without modifying the computational model.

cs.CE↗