SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Daniel Burkhardt Cerigo

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Burkhardt Cerigo.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

White Paper: Human-AI Collaboration in Conflict Analysis: Text Classifier Development with Peacebuilders

This paper documents a collaborative research process involving peacebuilders and data scientists in Kenya and Sudan to develop AI-based text classifiers for monitoring online polarization and hatespeech. The method describes a participatory annotation process in which practitioners and domain experts contributed to problem definition, annotation design, iterative validation, and model evaluation. Fine-tuned BERT-based classifiers were trained on collaboratively annotated datasets and evaluated against held-out test sets. In each case, the models produced enhanced contextual alignment, reduced misclassification driven by cultural nuance, and increased practitioner ownership of AI tools. The resulting models (Kenya-polarization and Sudan-hate speech) are open-source and accessible via HuggingFace. The study contributes empirical evidence that participatory AI development can simultaneously improve technical robustness, contextual validity, and normative alignment in sensitive humanitarian domains.

cs.HC

Technological novelty profile and invention's future impact

We consider inventions as novel combinations of existing technological capabilities. Patent data allow us to explicitly identify such combinatorial processes in invention activities. Unconsidered in the previous research, not every new combination is novel to the same extent. Some combinations are naturally anticipated based on patent activities in the past or mere random choices, and some appear to deviate exceptionally from existing invention pathways. We calculate a relative likelihood that each pair of classification codes is put together at random, and a deviation from the empirical observation so as to assess the overall novelty (or conventionality) that the patent brings forth at each year. An invention is considered as unconventional if a pair of codes therein is unlikely to be used together given the statistics in the past. Temporal evolution of the distribution indicates that the patenting activities become more conventional with occasional cross-over combinations. Our analyses show that patents introducing novelty on top of the conventional units would receive higher citations, and hence have higher impact.

physics.soc-ph