SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Daniel Coupland

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Coupland.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Detector Response Matrices, Effective Areas, and Flash-Effective Areas for Radiation Detectors

A Detector Response Matrix (DRM) is a discrete representation of an instrument's Detector Response Function (DRF), which quantifies how many discrete energy depositions occur in a detector volume for a given distribution of particles incident on the detector. For simple radiation detectors that can count such energy depositions (such as scintillators, Proportional Counter Tubes (PCTs), etc), we consider the ideal counting DRF, $\mathbf{G}_\varphi (E_\mathrm{in}, E_\mathrm{dep})$, which relates the detector's counting histogram (number of energy depositions within a given channel) to an incident particles characterization, $\varphi$ (e.g. incident flux, fluence, intensity). From the counting DRF we can derive the counting DRM, the effective area, and the flash effective area (which measures the total energy deposited in the detector from a large, instantaneous fluence).

physics.ins-det

Systematic Uncertainties in the Measurement of Neutron lifetime Using Lunar Prospector Neutron Spectrometer

The lifetime of free neutrons measured in the lab has a long standing disparity of $\sim$9~s. A space-based technique has recently been proposed to independently measure the neutron lifetime using interactions between the galactic cosmic rays and a low atmosphere planetary body. This technique has not produced competitive results yet due to constraints of non-optimized data that contain large systematic errors. We use data from the neutron spectrometer on-board NASA's Lunar Prospector, and study two large systematics in the measurement of neutron lifetime: the lunar sub-surface temperature and the lunar surface composition. We use the HeCd and HeSn neutron spectrometer data when the spacecraft was in a highly elliptical orbit during the orbit insertion period. We report the neutron lifetime using four different models that each have different choices of surface temperature and composition. 5$^{\circ}$ \cite{prettyman2006elemental} and 2$^{\circ}$ re-binned \cite{wilson2021measurement} maps result in 777.6$\pm$11.7~s and 739.6$\pm$10.8~s respectively. For the 20$^{\circ}$ map, constant equatorial and a latitude-dependent temperature model result in 738.6$\pm$10.8~s and 767.3$\pm$11.2~s respectively. Increasing the complexities of the models accounting for the systematic effects increase the measured lifetime. However, the reported measurements are not competitive with the laboratory results due to large unaccounted systematics resulting from non-optimized measurements and modeling assumptions. This work serves as a study of systematic uncertainties for future neutron lifetime measurements using the space-based technique. We estimate the effect on the lifetime from the choice of temperature model to be to be 28.7 $\pm$ 15.5~s, and choice of compositional map (for 20$^\circ$ and 5$^\circ$ maps) to be 10.3 $\pm$ 12.2~s.

nucl-ex