Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Daniel Dadush

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Dadush.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

A Simple Method for Convex Optimization in the Oracle Model

We give a simple and natural method for computing approximately optimal solutions for minimizing a convex function $f$ over a convex set $K$ given by a separation oracle. Our method utilizes the Frank--Wolfe algorithm over the cone of valid inequalities of $K$ and subgradients of $f$. Under the assumption that $f$ is $L$-Lipschitz and that $K$ contains a ball of radius $r$ and is contained inside the origin centered ball of radius $R$, using $O(\frac{(RL)^2}{\varepsilon^2} \cdot \frac{R^2}{r^2})$ iterations and calls to the oracle, our main method outputs a point $x \in K$ satisfying $f(x) \leq \varepsilon + \min_{z \in K} f(z)$. Our algorithm is easy to implement, and we believe it can serve as a useful alternative to existing cutting plane methods. As evidence towards this, we show that it compares favorably in terms of iteration counts to the standard LP based cutting plane method and the analytic center cutting plane method, on a testbed of combinatorial, semidefinite and machine learning instances.

math.OC↗

Asymptotic Bounds on the Combinatorial Diameter of Random Polytopes

The combinatorial diameter $\operatorname{diam}(P)$ of a polytope $P$ is the maximum shortest path distance between any pair of vertices. In this paper, we provide upper and lower bounds on the combinatorial diameter of a random "spherical" polytope, which is tight to within one factor of dimension when the number of inequalities is large compared to the dimension. More precisely, for an $n$-dimensional polytope $P$ defined by the intersection of $m$ i.i.d.\ half-spaces whose normals are chosen uniformly from the sphere, we show that $\operatorname{diam}(P)$ is $Ω(n m^{\frac{1}{n-1}})$ and $O(n^2 m^{\frac{1}{n-1}} + n^5 4^n)$ with high probability when $m \geq 2^{Ω(n)}$. For the upper bound, we first prove that the number of vertices in any fixed two dimensional projection sharply concentrates around its expectation when $m$ is large, where we rely on the $Θ(n^2 m^{\frac{1}{n-1}})$ bound on the expectation due to Borgwardt [Math. Oper. Res., 1999]. To obtain the diameter upper bound, we stitch these ``shadows paths'' together over a suitable net using worst-case diameter bounds to connect vertices to the nearest shadow. For the lower bound, we first reduce to lower bounding the diameter of the dual polytope $P^\circ$, corresponding to a random convex hull, by showing the relation $\operatorname{diam}(P) \geq (n-1)(\operatorname{diam}(P^\circ)-2)$. We then prove that the shortest path between any ``nearly'' antipodal pair vertices of $P^\circ$ has length $Ω(m^{\frac{1}{n-1}})$.

math.PR↗

A New Framework for Matrix Discrepancy: Partial Coloring Bounds via Mirror Descent

Motivated by the Matrix Spencer conjecture, we study the problem of finding signed sums of matrices with a small matrix norm. A well-known strategy to obtain these signs is to prove, given matrices $A_1, \dots, A_n \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times m}$, a Gaussian measure lower bound of $2^{-O(n)}$ for a scaling of the discrepancy body $\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n: \| \sum_{i=1}^n x_i A_i\| \leq 1\}$. We show this is equivalent to covering its polar with $2^{O(n)}$ translates of the cube $\frac{1}{n} B^n_\infty$, and construct such a cover via mirror descent. As applications of our framework, we show: $\bullet$ Matrix Spencer for Low-Rank Matrices. If the matrices satisfy $\|A_i\|_{\mathrm{op}} \leq 1$ and $\mathrm{rank}(A_i) \leq r$, we can efficiently find a coloring $x \in \{\pm 1\}^n$ with discrepancy $\|\sum_{i=1}^n x_i A_i \|_{\mathrm{op}} \lesssim \sqrt{n \log (\min(rm/n, r))}$. This improves upon the naive $O(\sqrt{n \log r})$ bound for random coloring and proves the matrix Spencer conjecture when $r m \leq n$. $\bullet$ Matrix Spencer for Block Diagonal Matrices. For block diagonal matrices with $\|A_i\|_{\mathrm{op}} \leq 1$ and block size $h$, we can efficiently find a coloring $x \in \{\pm 1\}^n$ with $\|\sum_{i=1}^n x_i A_i \|_{\mathrm{op}} \lesssim \sqrt{n \log (hm/n)}$. Using our proof, we reduce the matrix Spencer conjecture to the existence of a $O(\log(m/n))$ quantum relative entropy net on the spectraplex. $\bullet$ Matrix Discrepancy for Schatten Norms. We generalize our discrepancy bound for matrix Spencer to Schatten norms $2 \le p \leq q$. Given $\|A_i\|_{S_p} \leq 1$ and $\mathrm{rank}(A_i) \leq r$, we can efficiently find a partial coloring $x \in [-1,1]^n$ with $|\{i : |x_i| = 1\}| \ge n/2$ and $\|\sum_{i=1}^n x_i A_i\|_{S_q} \lesssim \sqrt{n \min(p, \log(rk))} \cdot k^{1/p-1/q}$, where $k := \min(1,m/n)$.

cs.DS↗

On the Integrality Gap of Binary Integer Programs with Gaussian Data

For a binary integer program (IP) ${\rm max} ~ c^\mathsf{T} x, Ax \leq b, x \in \{0,1\}^n$, where $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ and $c \in \mathbb{R}^n$ have independent Gaussian entries and the right-hand side $b \in \mathbb{R}^m$ satisfies that its negative coordinates have $\ell_2$ norm at most $n/10$, we prove that the gap between the value of the linear programming relaxation and the IP is upper bounded by $\operatorname{poly}(m)(\log n)^2 / n$ with probability at least $1-2/n^7-2^{-\operatorname{poly}(m)}$. Our results give a Gaussian analogue of the classical integrality gap result of Dyer and Frieze (Math. of O.R., 1989) in the case of random packing IPs. In constrast to the packing case, our integrality gap depends only polynomially on $m$ instead of exponentially. Building upon recent breakthrough work of Dey, Dubey and Molinaro (SODA, 2021), we show that the integrality gap implies that branch-and-bound requires $n^{\operatorname{poly}(m)}$ time on random Gaussian IPs with good probability, which is polynomial when the number of constraints $m$ is fixed. We derive this result via a novel meta-theorem, which relates the size of branch-and-bound trees and the integrality gap for random logconcave IPs.

math.OC↗

An Accelerated Newton-Dinkelbach Method and its Application to Two Variables Per Inequality Systems

We present an accelerated, or 'look-ahead' version of the Newton-Dinkelbach method, a well-known technique for solving fractional and parametric optimization problems. This acceleration halves the Bregman divergence between the current iterate and the optimal solution within every two iterations. Using the Bregman divergence as a potential in conjunction with combinatorial arguments, we obtain strongly polynomial algorithms in three applications domains: (i) For linear fractional combinatorial optimization, we show a convergence bound of $O(m \log m)$ iterations; the previous best bound was $O(m^2 \log m)$ by Wang et al. (2006). (ii) We obtain a strongly polynomial label-correcting algorithm for solving linear feasibility systems with two variables per inequality (2VPI). For a 2VPI system with $n$ variables and $m$ constraints, our algorithm runs in $O(mn)$ iterations. Every iteration takes $O(mn)$ time for general 2VPI systems, and $O(m + n \log n)$ time for the special case of deterministic Markov Decision Processes (DMDPs). This extends and strengthens a previous result by Madani (2002) that showed a weakly polynomial bound for a variant of the Newton-Dinkelbach method for solving DMDPs. (iii) We give a simplified variant of the parametric submodular function minimization result by Goemans et al. (2017).

cs.DS↗

Majorizing Measures for the Optimizer

The theory of majorizing measures, extensively developed by Fernique, Talagrand and many others, provides one of the most general frameworks for controlling the behavior of stochastic processes. In particular, it can be applied to derive quantitative bounds on the expected suprema and the degree of continuity of sample paths for many processes. One of the crowning achievements of the theory is Talagrand's tight alternative characterization of the suprema of Gaussian processes in terms of majorizing measures. The proof of this theorem was difficult, and thus considerable effort was put into the task of developing both shorter and easier to understand proofs. A major reason for this difficulty was considered to be theory of majorizing measures itself, which had the reputation of being opaque and mysterious. As a consequence, most recent treatments of the theory (including by Talagrand himself) have eschewed the use of majorizing measures in favor of a purely combinatorial approach (the generic chaining) where objects based on sequences of partitions provide roughly matching upper and lower bounds on the desired expected supremum. In this paper, we return to majorizing measures as a primary object of study, and give a viewpoint that we think is natural and clarifying from an optimization perspective. As our main contribution, we give an algorithmic proof of the majorizing measures theorem based on two parts: (1) We make the simple (but apparently new) observation that finding the best majorizing measure can be cast as a convex program. This also allows for efficiently computing the measure using off-the-shelf methods from convex optimization. (2) We obtain tree-based upper and lower bound certificates by rounding, in a series of steps, the primal and dual solutions to this convex program. [...]

math.PR↗

Revisiting Tardos's Framework for Linear Programming: Faster Exact Solutions using Approximate Solvers

In breakthrough work, Tardos (Oper. Res. '86) gave a proximity based framework for solving linear programming (LP) in time depending only on the constraint matrix in the bit complexity model. In Tardos's framework, one reduces solving the LP $\min \langle c,{x}\rangle$, $Ax=b$, $x \geq 0$, $A \in \mathbb{Z}^{m \times n}$, to solving $O(nm)$ LPs in $A$ having small integer coefficient objectives and right-hand sides using any exact LP algorithm. This gives rise to an LP algorithm in time poly$(n,m\logΔ_A)$, where $Δ_A$ is the largest subdeterminant of $A$. A significant extension to the real model of computation was given by Vavasis and Ye (Math. Prog. '96), giving a specialized interior point method that runs in time poly$(n,m,\log\barχ_A)$, depending on Stewart's $\barχ_A$, a well-studied condition number. In this work, we extend Tardos's original framework to obtain such a running time dependence. In particular, we replace the exact LP solves with approximate ones, enabling us to directly leverage the tremendous recent algorithmic progress for approximate linear programming. More precisely, we show that the fundamental "accuracy" needed to exactly solve any LP in $A$ is inverse polynomial in $n$ and $\log\barχ_A$. Plugging in the recent algorithm of van den Brand (SODA '20), our method computes an optimal primal and dual solution using ${O}(m n^{ω+1} \log (n)\log(\barχ_A+n))$ arithmetic operations, outperforming the specialized interior point method of Vavasis and Ye and its recent improvement by Dadush et al (STOC '20). At a technical level, our framework combines together approximate LP solutions to compute exact ones, making use of constructive proximity theorems -- which bound the distance between solutions of "nearby" LPs -- to keep the required accuracy low.

math.OC↗

On the Complexity of Branching Proofs

We consider the task of proving integer infeasibility of a bounded convex $K$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ using a general branching proof system. In a general branching proof, one constructs a branching tree by adding an integer disjunction $\mathbf{a} \mathbf{x} \leq b$ or $\mathbf{a} \mathbf{x} \geq b+1$, $\mathbf{a} \in \mathbb{Z}^n$, $b \in \mathbb{Z}$, at each node, such that the leaves of the tree correspond to empty sets (i.e., $K$ together with the inequalities picked up from the root to leaf is empty). Recently, Beame et al (ITCS 2018), asked whether the bit size of the coefficients in a branching proof, which they named stabbing planes (SP) refutations, for the case of polytopes derived from SAT formulas, can be assumed to be polynomial in $n$. We resolve this question by showing that any branching proof can be recompiled so that the integer disjunctions have coefficients of size at most $(n R)^{O(n^2)}$, where $R \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $K \in R \mathbb{B}_1^n$, while increasing the number of nodes in the branching tree by at most a factor $O(n)$. As our second contribution, we show that Tseitin formulas, an important class of infeasible SAT instances, have quasi-polynomial sized cutting plane (CP) refutations, disproving the conjecture that Tseitin formulas are (exponentially) hard for CP. As our final contribution, we give a simple family of polytopes in $[0,1]^n$ requiring branching proofs of length $2^n/n$.

cs.CC↗

Geometric Rescaling Algorithms for Submodular Function Minimization

We present a new class of polynomial-time algorithms for submodular function minimization (SFM), as well as a unified framework to obtain strongly polynomial SFM algorithms. Our algorithms are based on simple iterative methods for the minimum-norm problem, such as the conditional gradient and Fujishige-Wolfe algorithms. We exhibit two techniques to turn simple iterative methods into polynomial-time algorithms. Firstly, we adapt the geometric rescaling technique, which has recently gained attention in linear programming, to SFM and obtain a weakly polynomial bound $O(({n}^4\cdot \textrm{EO} + {n}^5)\log ({n} L))$. Secondly, we exhibit a general combinatorial black-box approach to turn $\varepsilon L$-approximate SFM oracles into strongly polynomial exact SFM algorithms. This framework can be applied to a wide range of combinatorial and continuous algorithms, including pseudo-polynomial ones. In particular, we can obtain strongly polynomial algorithms by a repeated application of the conditional gradient or of the Fujishige-Wolfe algorithm. Combined with the geometric rescaling technique, the black-box approach provides an $O(({n}^5\cdot \textrm{EO} +{n}^6)\log^2{n})$ algorithm. Finally, we show that one of the techniques we develop in the paper can also be combined with the cutting-plane method of Lee, Sidford, and Wong \cite{LSW}, yielding a simplified variant of their $O(n^3 \log^2 n \cdot \textrm{EO} + n^4\log^{O(1)} n)$ algorithm.

math.OC↗

A Friendly Smoothed Analysis of the Simplex Method

Explaining the excellent practical performance of the simplex method for linear programming has been a major topic of research for over 50 years. One of the most successful frameworks for understanding the simplex method was given by Spielman and Teng (JACM `04), who developed the notion of smoothed analysis. Starting from an arbitrary linear program with $d$ variables and $n$ constraints, Spielman and Teng analyzed the expected runtime over random perturbations of the LP (smoothed LP), where variance $σ^2$ Gaussian noise is added to the LP data. In particular, they gave a two-stage shadow vertex simplex algorithm which uses an expected $\widetilde{O}(d^{55} n^{86} σ^{-30})$ number of simplex pivots to solve the smoothed LP. Their analysis and runtime was substantially improved by Deshpande and Spielman (FOCS `05) and later Vershynin (SICOMP `09). The fastest current algorithm, due to Vershynin, solves the smoothed LP using an expected $O(d^3 σ^{-4} \log^3 n + d^9\log^7 n)$ number of pivots, improving the dependence on $n$ from polynomial to poly-logarithmic. While the original proof of Spielman and Teng has now been substantially simplified, the resulting analyses are still quite long and complex and the parameter dependencies far from optimal. In this work, we make substantial progress on this front, providing an improved and simpler analysis of shadow simplex methods, where our algorithm requires an expected \[ O(d^2 \sqrt{\log n} σ^{-2} + d^3 \log^{3/2} n) \] number of simplex pivots. We obtain our results via an improved \emph{shadow bound}, key to earlier analyses as well, combined with improvements on algorithmic techniques of Vershynin. As an added bonus, our analysis is completely modular, allowing us to obtain non-trivial bounds for perturbations beyond Gaussians, such as Laplace perturbations.

cs.DS↗

Rescaling Algorithms for Linear Conic Feasibility

We propose simple polynomial-time algorithms for two linear conic feasibility problems. For a matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$, the kernel problem requires a positive vector in the kernel of $A$, and the image problem requires a positive vector in the image of $A^\top$. Both algorithms iterate between simple first order steps and rescaling steps. These rescalings improve natural geometric potentials. If Goffin's condition measure $ρ_A$ is negative, then the kernel problem is feasible and the worst-case complexity of the kernel algorithm is $O\left((m^3n+mn^2)\log{|ρ_A|^{-1}}\right)$; if $ρ_A>0$, then the image problem is feasible and the image algorithm runs in time $O\left(m^2n^2\log{ρ_A^{-1}}\right)$. We also extend the image algorithm to the oracle setting. We address the degenerate case $ρ_A=0$ by extending our algorithms to find maximum support nonnegative vectors in the kernel of $A$ and in the image of $A^\top$. In this case the running time bounds are expressed in the bit-size model of computation: for an input matrix $A$ with integer entries and total encoding length $L$, the maximum support kernel algorithm runs in time $O\left((m^3n+mn^2)L\right)$, while the maximum support image algorithm runs in time $O\left(m^2n^2L\right)$. The standard linear programming feasibility problem can be easily reduced to either maximum support problems, yielding polynomial-time algorithms for Linear Programming.

math.OC↗

AWGN-Goodness is Enough: Capacity-Achieving Lattice Codes based on Dithered Probabilistic Shaping

In this paper we show that any sequence of infinite lattice constellations which is good for the unconstrained Gaussian channel can be shaped into a capacity-achieving sequence of codes for the power-constrained Gaussian channel under lattice decoding and non-uniform signalling. Unlike previous results in the literature, our scheme holds with no extra condition on the lattices (e.g. quantization-goodness or vanishing flatness factor), thus establishing a direct implication between AWGN-goodness, in the sense of Poltyrev, and capacity-achieving codes. Our analysis uses properties of the discrete Gaussian distribution in order to obtain precise bounds on the probability of error and achievable rates. In particular, we obtain a simple characterization of the finite-blocklength behavior of the scheme, showing that it approaches the optimal dispersion coefficient for \textit{high} signal-to-noise ratio. We further show that for \textit{low} signal-to-noise ratio the discrete Gaussian over centered lattice constellations can not achieve capacity, and thus a shift (or "dither") is essentially necessary.

cs.IT↗

Lattice-based Locality Sensitive Hashing is Optimal

Locality sensitive hashing (LSH) was introduced by Indyk and Motwani (STOC `98) to give the first sublinear time algorithm for the c-approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) problem using only polynomial space. At a high level, an LSH family hashes "nearby" points to the same bucket and "far away" points to different buckets. The quality of measure of an LSH family is its LSH exponent, which helps determine both query time and space usage. In a seminal work, Andoni and Indyk (FOCS `06) constructed an LSH family based on random ball partitioning of space that achieves an LSH exponent of 1/c^2 for the l_2 norm, which was later shown to be optimal by Motwani, Naor and Panigrahy (SIDMA `07) and O'Donnell, Wu and Zhou (TOCT `14). Although optimal in the LSH exponent, the ball partitioning approach is computationally expensive. So, in the same work, Andoni and Indyk proposed a simpler and more practical hashing scheme based on Euclidean lattices and provided computational results using the 24-dimensional Leech lattice. However, no theoretical analysis of the scheme was given, thus leaving open the question of finding the exponent of lattice based LSH. In this work, we resolve this question by showing the existence of lattices achieving the optimal LSH exponent of 1/c^2 using techniques from the geometry of numbers. At a more conceptual level, our results show that optimal LSH space partitions can have periodic structure. Understanding the extent to which additional structure can be imposed on these partitions, e.g. to yield low space and query complexity, remains an important open problem.

cs.DS↗

The Gram-Schmidt Walk: A Cure for the Banaszczyk Blues

An important result in discrepancy due to Banaszczyk states that for any set of $n$ vectors in $\mathbb{R}^m$ of $\ell_2$ norm at most $1$ and any convex body $K$ in $\mathbb{R}^m$ of Gaussian measure at least half, there exists a $\pm 1$ combination of these vectors which lies in $5K$. This result implies the best known bounds for several problems in discrepancy. Banaszczyk's proof of this result is non-constructive and a major open problem has been to give an efficient algorithm to find such a $\pm 1$ combination of the vectors. In this paper, we resolve this question and give an efficient randomized algorithm to find a $\pm 1$ combination of the vectors which lies in $cK$ for $c>0$ an absolute constant. This leads to new efficient algorithms for several problems in discrepancy theory.

cs.DS↗

Towards a Constructive Version of Banaszczyk's Vector Balancing Theorem

An important theorem of Banaszczyk (Random Structures & Algorithms `98) states that for any sequence of vectors of $\ell_2$ norm at most $1/5$ and any convex body $K$ of Gaussian measure $1/2$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, there exists a signed combination of these vectors which lands inside $K$. A major open problem is to devise a constructive version of Banaszczyk's vector balancing theorem, i.e. to find an efficient algorithm which constructs the signed combination. We make progress towards this goal along several fronts. As our first contribution, we show an equivalence between Banaszczyk's theorem and the existence of $O(1)$-subgaussian distributions over signed combinations. For the case of symmetric convex bodies, our equivalence implies the existence of a universal signing algorithm (i.e. independent of the body), which simply samples from the subgaussian sign distribution and checks to see if the associated combination lands inside the body. For asymmetric convex bodies, we provide a novel recentering procedure, which allows us to reduce to the case where the body is symmetric. As our second main contribution, we show that the above framework can be efficiently implemented when the vectors have length $O(1/\sqrt{\log n})$, recovering Banaszczyk's results under this stronger assumption. More precisely, we use random walk techniques to produce the required $O(1)$-subgaussian signing distributions when the vectors have length $O(1/\sqrt{\log n})$, and use a stochastic gradient ascent method to implement the recentering procedure for asymmetric bodies.

cs.DS↗

On the Lattice Distortion Problem

We introduce and study the \emph{Lattice Distortion Problem} (LDP). LDP asks how "similar" two lattices are. I.e., what is the minimal distortion of a linear bijection between the two lattices? LDP generalizes the Lattice Isomorphism Problem (the lattice analogue of Graph Isomorphism), which simply asks whether the minimal distortion is one. As our first contribution, we show that the distortion between any two lattices is approximated up to a $n^{O(\log n)}$ factor by a simple function of their successive minima. Our methods are constructive, allowing us to compute low-distortion mappings that are within a $2^{O(n \log \log n/\log n)}$ factor of optimal in polynomial time and within a $n^{O(\log n)}$ factor of optimal in singly exponential time. Our algorithms rely on a notion of basis reduction introduced by Seysen (Combinatorica 1993), which we show is intimately related to lattice distortion. Lastly, we show that LDP is NP-hard to approximate to within any constant factor (under randomized reductions), by a reduction from the Shortest Vector Problem.

cs.DS↗

An Algorithm for Komlós Conjecture Matching Banaszczyk's bound

We consider the problem of finding a low discrepancy coloring for sparse set systems where each element lies in at most t sets. We give an efficient algorithm that finds a coloring with discrepancy O((t log n)^{1/2}), matching the best known non-constructive bound for the problem due to Banaszczyk. The previous algorithms only achieved an O(t^{1/2} log n) bound. The result also extends to the more general Komlós setting and gives an algorithmic O(log^{1/2} n) bound.

cs.DS↗

Towards Strong Reverse Minkowski-type Inequalities for Lattices

We present a natural reverse Minkowski-type inequality for lattices, which gives upper bounds on the number of lattice points in a Euclidean ball in terms of sublattice determinants, and conjecture its optimal form. The conjecture exhibits a surprising wealth of connections to various areas in mathematics and computer science, including a conjecture motivated by integer programming by Kannan and Lovász (Annals of Math. 1988), a question from additive combinatorics asked by Green, a question on Brownian motions asked by Saloff-Coste (Colloq. Math. 2010), a theorem by Milman and Pisier from convex geometry (Ann. Probab. 1987), worst-case to average-case reductions in lattice-based cryptography, and more. We present these connections, provide evidence for the conjecture, and discuss possible approaches towards a proof. Our main technical contribution is in proving that our conjecture implies the $\ell_2$ case of the Kannan and Lovász conjecture. The proof relies on a novel convex relaxation for the covering radius, and a rounding procedure for based on "uncrossing" lattice subspaces.

math.MG↗